Christian Anthon

Dr. Christian Anthon


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 November 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Martien GroenenMartien Groenen
Martien Groenen
AAAlan L. Archibald
Alan L. Archibald
HUHirohide Uenishi
Hirohide Uenishi
CTChristopher K. Tuggle
Christopher K. Tuggle
YTYasuhiro Takeuchi
Yasuhiro Takeuchi
Lawrence SchookLawrence Schook
Lawrence Schook
For 10,000 years pigs and humans have shared a close and complex relationship. From domestication to modern breeding practices, humans have shaped the genomes of domestic pigs. Here we present the assembly and analysis of the genome sequence of a female domestic Duroc pig (Sus scrofa) and a comparison with the genomes of wild and domestic pigs from Europe and Asia. Wild pigs emerged in South East Asia and subsequently spread across Eurasia. Our results reveal a deep phylogenetic split between European and Asian wild boars ∼1 million years ago, and a selective sweep analysis indicates selection on genes involved in RNA processing and regulation. Genes associated with immune response and olfaction exhibit fast evolution. Pigs have the largest repertoire of functional olfactory receptor genes, reflecting the importance of smell in this scavenging animal. The pig genome sequence provides an important resource for further improvements of this important livestock species, and our identification of many putative disease-causing variants extends the potential of the pig as a biomedical model.

21 August 2008 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSuzanne C. Bart
Suzanne C. Bart
CAChristian Anthon
Christian Anthon
FHFrank W. Heinemann
Frank W. Heinemann
EBEckhard Bill
Eckhard Bill
NENorman M. Edelstein
Norman M. Edelstein
KMKarsten Meyer
Karsten Meyer

18 March 2008 in Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CVCarola Vogel
Carola Vogel
FHFrank W. Heinemann
Frank W. Heinemann
JSJörg Sutter
Jörg Sutter
CAChristian Anthon
Christian Anthon
KMKarsten Meyer
Karsten Meyer

26 October 2018 in Genome Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAFerhat Alkan
Ferhat Alkan
AWAnne Wenzel
Anne Wenzel
CAChristian Anthon
Christian Anthon
JHJakob Hull Havgaard
Jakob Hull Havgaard
JGJan Gorodkin
Jan Gorodkin
Recent experimental efforts of CRISPR-Cas9 systems have shown that off-target binding and cleavage are a concern for the system and that this is highly dependent on the selected guide RNA (gRNA) design. Computational predictions of off-targets have been proposed as an attractive and more feasible alternative to tedious experimental efforts. However, accurate scoring of the high number of putative off-targets plays a key role for the success of computational off-targeting assessment. We present an approximate binding energy model for the Cas9–gRNA–DNA complex, which systematically combines the energy parameters obtained for RNA–RNA, DNA–DNA, and RNA–DNA duplexes. Based on this model, two novel off-target assessment methods for gRNA selection in CRISPR-Cas9 applications are introduced: CRISPRoff to assign confidence scores to predicted off-targets and CRISPRspec to measure the specificity of the gRNA. We benchmark the methods against current state-of-the-art methods and show that both are in better agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we show significant evidence supporting the inverse relationship between the on-target cleavage efficiency and specificity of the system, in which introduced binding energies are key components. The impact of the binding energies provides a direction for further studies of off-targeting mechanisms. The performance of CRISPRoff and CRISPRspec enables more accurate off-target evaluation for gRNA selections, prior to any CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing application. For given gRNA sequences or all potential gRNAs in a given target region, CRISPRoff-based off-target predictions and CRISPRspec-based specificity evaluations can be carried out through our webserver at https://rth.dk/resources/crispr/ .

3 November 2015 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JIJon Ison
Jon Ison
KRKristoffer Rapacki
Kristoffer Rapacki
HMHervé Ménager
Hervé Ménager
MKMatúš Kalaš
Matúš Kalaš
EREmil Rydza
Emil Rydza
SBSøren Brunak
Søren Brunak
Life sciences are yielding huge data sets that underpin scientific discoveries fundamental to improvement in human health, agriculture and the environment. In support of these discoveries, a plethora of databases and tools are deployed, in technically complex and diverse implementations, across a spectrum of scientific disciplines. The corpus of documentation of these resources is fragmented across the Web, with much redundancy, and has lacked a common standard of information. The outcome is that scientists must often struggle to find, understand, compare and use the best resources for the task at hand. Here we present a community-driven curation effort, supported by ELIXIR—the European infrastructure for biological information—that aspires to a comprehensive and consistent registry of information about bioinformatics resources. The sustainable upkeep of this Tools and Data Services Registry is assured by a curation effort driven by and tailored to local needs, and shared amongst a network of engaged partners. As of November 2015, the registry includes 1785 resources, with depositions from 126 individual registrations including 52 institutional providers and 74 individuals. With community support, the registry can become a standard for dissemination of information about bioinformatics resources: we welcome everyone to join us in this common endeavour. The registry is freely available at https://bio.tools.

26 April 2008 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OLOanh P. Lam
Oanh P. Lam
CAChristian Anthon
Christian Anthon
FHFrank W. Heinemann
Frank W. Heinemann
JOJoseph M. O’connor
Joseph M. O’connor
KMKarsten Meyer
Karsten Meyer