marzia duse

Prof. marzia duse

Sapienza University of Rome
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

45Years (1982-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 1999 in The American Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FFFabio Facchetti
Fabio Facchetti
WVWilliam Vermi
William Vermi
SFSimona Fiorentini
Simona Fiorentini
MCMarco Chilosi
Marco Chilosi
ACArnaldo Caruso
Arnaldo Caruso
RBRaffaele Badolato
Raffaele Badolato

15 August 2019 in Italian Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Carlo CaffarelliCarlo Caffarelli
Carlo Caffarelli
FPFrancesco Paravati
Francesco Paravati
MHMay El Hachem
May El Hachem
MDmarzia duse
marzia duse
MBMarcello Bergamini
Marcello Bergamini
FCFabio Cardinale
Fabio Cardinale
The aim of this guidance is to provide recommendations to clinicians and other interested parties on chronic urticaria in children. The Italian Society for Pediatrics (SIP), the Italian Society for Allergy and Immunology (SIAIP), the Italian Society for Pediatric dermatology (SIDerP) convened a multidisciplinary panel that prepared clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management of chronic urticaria in childhood. Key questions on epidemiology, natural history, diagnosis, and management were developed. The literature was systematically searched and evaluated, recommendations were rated and algorithms for diagnosis and treatment were developed. The recommendations focus on identification of diseases and comorbidities, strategies to recognize triggering factors, improvement of treatment by individualized care.

23 January 2017 in Italian Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
A(Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy Panel Of The Italian Society Of Pediatric Allergy And Immunology (Siaip)
Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy Panel Of The Italian Society Of Pediatric Allergy And Immunology (Siaip)
GPGiovanni Battista Pajno
Giovanni Battista Pajno
RBRoberto Bernardini
Roberto Bernardini
DPDIEGO PERONI
DIEGO PERONI
SAStefania Arasi
Stefania Arasi
MDmarzia duse
marzia duse
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is currently recognized as a clinically effective treatment for allergic diseases, with a unique disease-modifying effect. AIT was introduced in clinical practice one century ago, and performed in the early years with allergenic extracts of poor quality and definition. After the mechanism of allergic reaction were recognized, the practice of AIT was refined, leading to remarkable improvement in the efficacy and safety profile of the treatment. Currently AIT is accepted and routinely prescribed worldwide for respiratory allergies and hymenoptera venom allergy. Both the subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual (SLIT) routes of administration are used in the pediatric population. AIT is recommended in allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis with/without allergic asthma, with an evidence of specific IgE-sensitization towards clinically relevant inhalant allergens. Long-term studies provided evidence that AIT can also prevent the onset of asthma and of new sensitizations. The favorable response to AIT is strictly linked to adherence to treatment, that lasts 3–5 years. Therefore, several factors should be carefully evaluated before starting this intervention, including the severity of symptoms, pharmacotherapy requirements and children and caregivers’ preference and compliance. In recent years, there have been increasing interest in the role of AIT for the treatment of IgE-associated food allergy and extrinsic atopic dermatitis. A growing body of evidence shows that oral immunotherapy represents a promising treatment option for IgE-associated food allergy. On the contrary, there are still controversies on the effectiveness of AIT for patients with atopic dermatitis. This consensus document was promoted by the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology (SIAIP) to provide evidence-based recommendations on AIT in order to implement and optimize current prescription practices of this treatment for allergic children.

1 December 2000 in Immunological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LNLuigi D. Notarangelo
Luigi D. Notarangelo
SGSilvia Giliani
Silvia Giliani
CMCinzia Mazza
Cinzia Mazza
PMPatrizia Mella
Patrizia Mella
GSGianfranco Savoldi
Gianfranco Savoldi
RSRichard F. Schumacher
Richard F. Schumacher

16 April 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CACaterina Anania
Caterina Anania
VMVincenza Patrizia Di Marino
Vincenza Patrizia Di Marino
FOFrancesca Olivero
Francesca Olivero
DCDaniela De Canditiis
Daniela De Canditiis
GBgiulia brindisi
giulia brindisi
MDmarzia duse
marzia duse
Background: Probiotics may prevent the allergic response development due to their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. The aim of this study is to determine if the prophylactic treatment with a mixture of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. Lactis BB12 and Enterococcus faecium L3 would reduce symptoms and need for drug use in children with allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods: The study included 250 children aged from 6 to 17 years, affected by AR. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (150) or to the placebo group (100). Patients in the intervention group, in addition to conventional therapy (local corticosteroids and/or oral antihistamines), were treated in the 3 months preceding the onset of symptoms related to the presence of the allergen to which the children were most sensitized, with a daily oral administration of a probiotic mixture containing the Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. Lactis BB12 DSM 15954 and the Enterococcus faecium L3 LMG P-27496 strain. We used Nasal Symptoms Score (NSS) to evaluate AR severity before and after the treatment with probiotics or placebo. Results: the patients in the intervention group had a significant reduction in their NSS after probiotic treatment (p-value = 2.2 × 10−10. Moreover, for the same group of patients, we obtained a significant reduction in the intake of pharmacological therapy. In particular, we obtained a reduction in the use of oral antihistamines (p-value = 2.2 × 10−16), local corticosteroids (p-value = 2.2 × 10−13), and of both drugs (p-value 1.5 × 10−15). Conclusions: When administered as a prophylactic treatment, a mixture of BB12 and L3 statistically decreased signs and symptoms of AR and reduced significantly the need of conventional therapy.

1 August 2001 in AIDS
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMaurizio de Martino
Maurizio de Martino
PTPier-Angelo Tovo
Pier-Angelo Tovo
LGLuisa Galli
Luisa Galli
CGClara Gabiano
Clara Gabiano
FCFrancesco Chiarelli
Francesco Chiarelli
DCDesirée Caselli
Desirée Caselli
To define age at entry into Tanner stages in children with perinatal HIV-1 infection. Multicentre longitudinal study including 212 perinatally HIV-1-infected children (107 girls and 105 boys) followed-up during puberty (from 8 and 9 years onwards in girls and boys, respectively). Healthy children (843 girls and 821 boys) provided reference percentiles. P2 or B2 stages in girls and P2 or G2 stages in boys defined onset of puberty. The cumulative probability [95% confidence limit (CI)] of entry into each stage at different ages was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier product-limit method; differences were evaluated by log rank test. Relationships were tested using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Ages of girls [years (95%CI)] at P2 [12.9 (12.6–13.2)], P3 [13.4 (13.0–13.8)], P4 [14.6 (14.0–15.2)], B2 [12.7 (12.2–13.2)], B3 [13.3 (12.8–14.0)] and B4 [14.6 (14.0–15.2)] stages were > 97th percentile (≥ 21 month delay) of controls. Ages of boys [years (95%CI)] at P2 [12.6 (12.1–13.1)], P3 [13.9 (13.4–14.4)], P4 [14.9 (14.2–15.6)], G2 [12.1 (11.5–12.7)], G3 [13.6 (13.1–14.1)] and G4 [14.9 (14.1–15.7)] stages were at the 75–97th percentiles (≤ 15 month delay). Age at onset of puberty was not related to clinical and immunological condition, antiretroviral treatment, weigh for height and age at onset of severe disease or immune suppression. Perinatal HIV-1 infection interferes with sexual maturation. The mechanisms by which this occurs should be elucidated and intervention strategies designed. Intervention could save much psychological distress, since associated linear growthfailure can exacerbate adolescents’ feelings of being different and unwell.