Duvaraga Sivajohanathan

Ms. Duvaraga Sivajohanathan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 April 2022 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPhillip S. Blanchette
Phillip S. Blanchette
DSDuvaraga Sivajohanathan
Duvaraga Sivajohanathan
JBJohn Bartlett
John Bartlett
AEAndrea Eisen
Andrea Eisen
HFHarriet Feilotter
Harriet Feilotter
PWPhillip Williams
Phillip Williams
Objective: The purpose of this guideline is to determine the clinical utility of multigene profiling assays in individuals with early-stage invasive breast cancer. Methods: This guideline was developed by Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)’s Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC) through a systematic review of relevant literature, patient- and caregiver-specific consultation and internal and external reviews. Recommendation 1: In patients with early-stage estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, clinicians should consider using multigene profiling assays (i.e., Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, Prosigna, EndoPredict, and the Breast Cancer Index) to help guide the use of systemic therapy. Recommendation 2: In patients with early-stage node-negative ER-positive/HER2-negative disease, clinicians may use a low-risk result from Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, Prosigna, EndoPredict/EPclin, or Breast Cancer Index assays to support a decision not to use adjuvant chemotherapy. Recommendation 3: In patients with node-negative ER-positive/HER2-negative disease, clinicians may use a high-risk result from Oncotype DX to support a decision to offer chemotherapy. A high Oncotype DX recurrence score is capable of predicting adjuvant chemotherapy benefit. Recommendation 4: In postmenopausal patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative tumours and one to three nodes involved (N1a disease), clinicians may withhold chemotherapy based on a low-risk Oncotype DX or MammaPrint score if the decision is supported by other clinical, pathological, or patient-related factors. Recommendation 5: The evidence to support the use of molecular profiling to select the duration of endocrine therapy is evolving. In patients with ER-positive disease, clinicians may consider using a Breast Cancer Index (H/I) high assay result to support a decision to extend adjuvant endocrine therapy if the decision is supported by other clinical, pathological, or patient-related factors.

1 August 2017 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSS. Singh
S. Singh
DSDuvaraga Sivajohanathan
Duvaraga Sivajohanathan
TAT. Asmis
T. Asmis
CCC. Cho
C. Cho
NHN. Hammad
N. Hammad
KZK. Zbuk
K. Zbuk
Purpose: The purpose of the present review was to determine which antineoplastic systemic therapy is most effective in improving clinical outcomes for patients with incurable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETS). Methods: A systematic search (2008–2016) of the literature in the medline and embase databases and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted; abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the American Society of Clinical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, the European Society for Medical Oncology, the European Cancer Congress, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society were reviewed. Draft recommendations were created, and a comprehensive review process was undertaken. Outcomes—including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, objective response rate, adverse events, and quality of life—were extracted from each of the studies. Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCTS), sixteen nonrandomized prospective studies, and thirteen retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. Conclusions: Patients with well- or moderately-differentiated pancreatic NETS (PNETS) should receive targeted therapy (that is, everolimus or sunitinib), and patients with non-PNETS should be offered either targeted therapy (that is, everolimus) or somatostatin analogues (SSAS—that is, octreotide long-acting release or lanreotide). Evidence from two phase iii trials demonstrated a significant PFS benefit for patients with PNETS. For patients with non-PNETS, the evidence comes from subgroup analyses of RCTS, as well as from a planned interim analysis. Although the evidence has limitations, the rarity of the disease, coupled with the difficulty of conducting methodologically sound trials in the affected population, means that treatment decisions have to make use of the best available evidence. Because of insufficient evidence for both PNETS and non-PNETS, no evidence-based recommendation can be made for or against other types of targeted therapy, other SSAS, chemotherapy, or combination therapy.

1 November 2020 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARebecca Auer
Rebecca Auer
DSDuvaraga Sivajohanathan
Duvaraga Sivajohanathan
JBJim Biagi
Jim Biagi
JCJames Conner
James Conner
EKErin Kennedy
Erin Kennedy
TMTaymaa May
Taymaa May