(1) Background: Muscle tension around the head and neck influences orofacial functions. The data exist concerning head posture during increased salivation; however, little is known about muscle tightness during this process. This study aims to investigate whether or not any muscles are related to problems with eating, such as drooling in individuals with cerebral palsy; (2) Methods: Nineteen patients between the ages of 1 and 14 were examined prior to the physiotherapy intervention. This intervention lasted three months and consisted of: relaxing muscles via the strain-counterstrain technique, functional exercises based on the NeuroDevelopmental Treatment-Bobath method, and functional exercises for eating; (3) Results: the tone of rectus capitis posterior minor muscle on the left side (p = 0.027) and temporalis muscle on the right side (p = 0.048) before the therapy, and scalene muscle on the right side after the therapy (p = 0.024) were correlated with drooling behavior and were considered statistically significant. Gross motor function was not considered statistically significant with the occurrence of drooling behavior (p ≤ 0.05). Following the therapeutic intervention, the frequency of drooling during feeding decreased from 63.16% to 38.89% of the total sample of examined patients; (4) Conclusions: The tightness of the muscles in the head area can cause drooling during feeding.

Background/Objectives: The Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S) is a versatile tool used for the assessment of orofacial function. The aim of this study was to introduce the Polish version of the NOT-S along with the results of its cultural adaptation. Methods: The original NOT-S was validated into the Polish language in accordance with the current questionnaire translation standards, including the cultural adaptation, which consisted of an examination of Polish society. The pilot study, as a cultural adaptation, was carried out among fifty people between the ages of 3 and 34 (Mean—15.8, SD—8.9). Results: During the translation, three word discrepancies were noted, and also many linguistic equivalences, such as semantic, empirical, conceptual, and other differences, were reported. The average total NOT-S score during cultural adaptation was 1.62 (SD 1.16; Range 0–5). Abnormalities in section III, i.e., habits (78%), were found most frequently in the subjects. A thorough data analysis showed statistically significant results in section IV of the interview, i.e., chewing and swallowing (p = 0.00073), and also significant results in section 3 of the examination, i.e., facial expression (p = 0.00006). Conclusions: The Polish version of the NOT-S is linguistically comprehensible and culturally equivalent, and can be used for the examination of children, adolescents, and adults. The findings of this study indicate that orofacial function screening is advisable in the healthy population.

Background: Orofacial dysfunctions are a source of discontent and impair daily living activities. Patients with hearing impairments exhibit an elevated risk of stomatognathic system changes. Hence, this pilot study aims to evaluate changes in stomatognathic system functions in patients with hearing impairments and cochlear implants. Methods: During the examination, the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening was used to assess orofacial functions. The range of motion within the temporomandibular joints was measured using a vernier caliper. A socio-medical study was conducted to collect data regarding the patients, the cochlear implant sides, and the methods of communication. Results: The statistical analysis showed a significant difference in the total NOT-S scores (p < 0.001) and examination scores (p < 0.001) between patients with hearing impairments and the control group. These significant differences of the total NOT-S score and examination score have large effect sizes (r > 0.5). In particular, significant differences were observed in the results of maximum mouth opening (p = 0.006) and right laterotrusion (p = 0.020). Differences were also observed in the answers regarding the method of communication and the examination score of the NOT-S questionnaire (p = 0.040). The 6A of the NOT-S significantly affected the examination score (p = 0.015) and the total NOT-S score (p = 0.037), while the result of section 6B only significantly affected the NOT-S examination score (p = 0.032). Conclusions: Patients with hearing impairments presented orofacial dysfunctions significantly more often than the control group. The side of cochlear implant implantation is important for stomatognathic system changes.