Guido Alejandro Davidzon

Prof. Dr. Guido Alejandro Davidzon

Stanford University School of Medicine
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2005 in Annals of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SDSalvatore DiMauro
Salvatore DiMauro
GDGuido Alejandro Davidzon
Guido Alejandro Davidzon
The small circle of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) present in all human cells has proven to be a veritable Pandora's box of pathogenic mutations and rearrangements. In this review, we summarize the distinctive rules of mitochondrial genetics (maternal inheritance, mitotic segregation, heteroplasmy and threshold effect), stress the relatively high prevalence of mtDNA‐related diseases, and consider recent additions to the already long list of pathogenic mutations (especially mutations affecting protein‐coding genes). We then discuss more controversial issues, including the functional or pathological role of mtDNA haplotypes, the pathogenicity of homoplasmic mutations and the still largely obscure pathophysiology of mtDNA mutations.

21 April 2006 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GDGuido Alejandro Davidzon
Guido Alejandro Davidzon
PGPaul Greene
Paul Greene
MMMichelangelo Mancuso
Michelangelo Mancuso
KKKevin J. Klos
Kevin J. Klos
JAJ. Eric Ahlskog
J. Eric Ahlskog
SDSalvatore DiMauro
Salvatore DiMauro

31 May 2005 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GDGuido Alejandro Davidzon
Guido Alejandro Davidzon
MMMichelangelo Mancuso
Michelangelo Mancuso
SFSilvio Ferraris
Silvio Ferraris
CQCatarina Quinzii
Catarina Quinzii
MHMichio Hirano
Michio Hirano
SDSalvatore DiMauro
Salvatore DiMauro

23 August 2021 in npj Digital Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAkshay Chaudhari
Akshay Chaudhari
EMErik Mittra
Erik Mittra
GDGuido Alejandro Davidzon
Guido Alejandro Davidzon
PGPraveen Gulaka
Praveen Gulaka
HGHarsh Gandhi
Harsh Gandhi
Hossein JadvarHossein Jadvar
Hossein Jadvar
More widespread use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is limited by its high cost and radiation dose. Reductions in PET scan time or radiotracer dosage typically degrade diagnostic image quality (DIQ). Deep-learning-based reconstruction may improve DIQ, but such methods have not been clinically evaluated in a realistic multicenter, multivendor environment. In this study, we evaluated the performance and generalizability of a deep-learning-based image-quality enhancement algorithm applied to fourfold reduced-count whole-body PET in a realistic clinical oncologic imaging environment with multiple blinded readers, institutions, and scanner types. We demonstrate that the low-count-enhanced scans were noninferior to the standard scans in DIQ (p < 0.05) and overall diagnostic confidence (p < 0.001) independent of the underlying PET scanner used. Lesion detection for the low-count-enhanced scans had a high patient-level sensitivity of 0.94 (0.83–0.99) and specificity of 0.98 (0.95–0.99). Interscan kappa agreement of 0.85 was comparable to intrareader (0.88) and pairwise inter-reader agreements (maximum of 0.72). SUV quantification was comparable in the reference regions and lesions (lowest p-value=0.59) and had high correlation (lowest CCC = 0.94). Thus, we demonstrated that deep learning can be used to restore diagnostic image quality and maintain SUV accuracy for fourfold reduced-count PET scans, with interscan variations in lesion depiction, lower than intra- and interreader variations. This method generalized to an external validation set of clinical patients from multiple institutions and scanner types. Overall, this method may enable either dose or exam-duration reduction, increasing safety and lowering the cost of PET imaging.

11 April 2007 in European Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAnna H Hakonen
Anna H Hakonen
GDGuido Alejandro Davidzon
Guido Alejandro Davidzon
RSRenato Salemi
Renato Salemi
LBLaurence A Bindoff
Laurence A Bindoff
GGGert Van Goethem
Gert Van Goethem
ASAnu Suomalainen
Anu Suomalainen

27 September 2012 in Journal of Personalized Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLeo Anthony Celi
Leo Anthony Celi
SGSean Galvin
Sean Galvin
GDGuido Alejandro Davidzon
Guido Alejandro Davidzon
JLJoon Lee
Joon Lee
DSDaniel Scott
Daniel Scott
RMRoger Mark
Roger Mark
We hypothesize that local customized modeling will provide more accurate mortality prediction than the current standard approach using existing scoring systems. Mortality prediction models were developed for two subsets of patients in Multi-parameter Intelligent Monitoring for Intensive Care (MIMIC), a public de-identified ICU database, and for the subset of patients >80 years old in a cardiac surgical patient registry. Logistic regression (LR), Bayesian network (BN) and artificial neural network (ANN) were employed. The best-fitted models were tested on the remaining unseen data and compared to either the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) for the ICU patients, or the EuroSCORE for the cardiac surgery patients. Local customized mortality prediction models performed better as compared to the corresponding current standard severity scoring system for all three subsets of patients: patients with acute kidney injury (AUC = 0.875 for ANN, vs. SAPS, AUC = 0.642), patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (AUC = 0.958 for BN, vs. SAPS, AUC = 0.84), and elderly patients undergoing open heart surgery (AUC = 0.94 for ANN, vs. EuroSCORE, AUC = 0.648). Rather than developing models with good external validity by including a heterogeneous patient population, an alternative approach would be to build models for specific patient subsets using one’s local database.