The synchronized motions of inner core residues allosterically modulate the activity of the protein kinase A catalytic subunit.

The intricacies of allosteric regulation of protein kinases continue to engage the research community. Allostery, or control from a distance, is seen as a fundamental biomolecular mechanism for proteins. From the traditional methods of conformational selection and induced fit, the field has grown to include the role of protein motions in defining a dynamics‐based allosteric approach. Harnessing of these continuous motions in the protein to exert allosteric effects can be defined by a “violin” model that focuses on distributions of protein vibrations as opposed to concerted pathways. According to this model, binding of an allosteric modifier causes global redistribution of dynamics in the protein kinase domain that leads to changes in its catalytic properties. This model is consistent with the “entropy‐driven allostery” mechanism proposed by Cooper and Dryden in 1984 and does not require, but does not exclude, any major structural changes. We provide an overview of practical implementation of the violin model and how it stands amidst the other known models of protein allostery. Protein kinases have been described as the biomolecules of interest. © 2019 IUBMB Life, 71(6):685–696, 2019

Allosteric regulation of proteins continues to be an engaging research topic for the scientific community. Models describing allosteric communication have evolved from focusing on conformation-based descriptors of protein structural changes to appreciating the role of internal protein dynamics as a mediator of allostery. Here, we explain a “violin model” for allostery as a contemporary method for approaching the Cooper–Dryden model based on redistribution of protein thermal fluctuations. Based on graph theory, the violin model makes use of community network analysis to functionally cluster correlated protein motions obtained from molecular dynamics simulations. This Review provides the theory and workflow of the methodology and explains the application of violin model to unravel the workings of protein kinase A.

Emerging evidence indicates that arginine methylation promotes the stability of arginine-glycine-rich (RGG) motif-containing RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and regulates gene expression. Here, we report that post-translational modification of FXR1 enhances the binding with mRNAs and is involved in cancer cell growth and proliferation. Independent point mutations in arginine residues of FXR1’s nuclear export signal (R386 and R388) and RGG (R453, R455 and R459) domains prevent it from binding to RNAs that form G-quadruplex (G4) RNA structures. Disruption of G4-RNA structures by lithium chloride failed to bind with FXR1, indicating its preference for G4-RNA structure containing mRNAs. Furthermore, loss-of-function of PRMT5 inhibited FXR1 methylation both in vivo and in vitro, affecting FXR1 protein stability, inhibiting RNA-binding activity and cancer cell growth and proliferation. Finally, the enhanced crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (eCLIP) analyses reveal that FXR1 binds with the G4-enriched mRNA targets such as AHNAK, MAP1B, AHNAK2, HUWE1, DYNC1H1 and UBR4 and controls its mRNA expression in cancer cells. Our findings suggest that PRMT5-mediated FXR1 methylation is required for RNA/G4-RNA binding, which promotes gene expression in cancer cells. Thus, FXR1’s structural characteristics and affinity for RNAs preferentially G4 regions provide new insights into the molecular mechanism of FXR1 in oral cancer cells.