Pamela Baxter

Dr. Pamela Baxter


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 April 2011 in Journal of Advanced Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPamela Baxter
Pamela Baxter
GNGeoff Norman
Geoff Norman

1 November 2009 in Nurse Education Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPamela Baxter
Pamela Baxter
NANoori Akhtar-Danesh
Noori Akhtar-Danesh
RVRuta Valaitis
Ruta Valaitis
WSWendy Stanyon
Wendy Stanyon
SSSusan Sproul
Susan Sproul


11 November 2016 in Journal of Advanced Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CDChristine Dennis
Christine Dennis
PBPamela Baxter
Pamela Baxter
JPJenny Ploeg
Jenny Ploeg
SBSusan Blatz
Susan Blatz

16 December 2015 in BMC Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LWLori Wozney
Lori Wozney
PBPamela Baxter
Pamela Baxter
ANAmanda S. Newton
Amanda S. Newton
Use of the Internet to deliver cognitive behavioural therapy, a frontline treatment for anxiety disorders, is emerging as an option to increase access to treatment among adolescents with anxiety disorders. This study examined the usability of the Internet-based component of Breathe, a CBT program designed for adolescents with mild to moderate anxiety and impairments. A mixed-method usability testing design with semi-structured interviews, task completion, and survey by trained usability moderators was undertaken with two interactive cycles to determine the usability (ease of use, efficiency, errors, and user satisfaction) of the user interface and content areas of the program. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit mental health clinicians with expertise in treating adolescent anxiety disorders and young people aged 15 to 24 years involved. Testing involved using Web-conferencing software that allowed remote participation through personal computers. Two testing cycles involved participants completing structured ‘think aloud’ and ‘cognitive walkthrough’ tasks within the program. At the end of each cycle participants completed a 15-item global usability evaluation survey and were asked a series of open-ended questions. Descriptive and simple content analyses were used to identify and score usability issues for frequency and severity. Five clinicians and four young people (all < 20 years of age) participated. Most participants described their computer skills as ‘good’ (60 % clinicians, 50 % young people), and attitudes toward Internet-based health care ranged from negative (75 % young people) to positive (60 % clinicians, 25 % young people). Scores from the global usability evaluation after both testing cycles ranged from 3.5 to 5 out of 5 in strong agreement/support of the program in terms of user performance indicators (i.e., learnability, efficiency and number of errors) and user satisfaction. Participants were able to complete all critical tasks with minimal errors. Errors and issues identified during testing were predominantly around enhancements to the visual design and navigational support. Opinions across usability elements did not differ between young people and clinician participants. A multi-method remote usability approach provided the opportunity to improve the technical interface, therapeutic messaging and user experience of an Internet-based treatment program for adolescent anxiety disorders.

28 May 2009 in International Journal of Integrated Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPamela Baxter
Pamela Baxter
MMMaureen Markle-Reid
Maureen Markle-Reid
Providing care for older home care clients 'at risk' of falling requires the services of many health care providers due to predisposing chronic, complex conditions. One strategy to ensure that quality care is delivered is described in the integrated care literature; interprofessional collaboration. Engaging in an interprofessional team approach to fall prevention for this group of clients seems to make sense. However, whether or not this approach is feasible and realistic is not well described in the literature. As well, little is known about how teams function in the community when an interprofessional approach is engaged in. The barriers and facilitators of such an approach are also not known. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe the experiences of five different health care professionals as they participated in an interprofessional team approach to care for the frail older adult living at home and at risk of falling. This study took place in Hamilton, ON, Canada and was part of a randomized controlled trial, the aim of which was to determine the effects and costs of a multifactorial and interdisciplinary team approach to fall prevention for older home care clients 'at risk' of falling. The current study utilized an exploratory descriptive design to answer the following research questions: how do interprofessional teams describe their experiences when involved in a research intervention requiring collaboration for a 9-month period of time? What are the barriers and facilitators to teamwork? Four focus groups were conducted with the care-provider teams (n=9) 6 and 9 months following group formation. This study revealed several themes which included, team capacity, practitioner competencies, perceived outcomes, support and time. Overall, care providers were positive about their experiences and felt that through an interprofessional approach benefits could be experienced by both the provider and the patient and his/her family. Findings from this study suggest that research needs to be conducted to further explore the issues faced by this group of care providers and potential client outcomes.