The lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic parameter for gastric cancer has yet to be fully validated in the current tumor node metastasis staging system. We assessed the prognostic role of LNR in lymph node-positive gastric cancer through a meta-analysis. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for relevant studies up until December 2016. The effect measure for meta-analysis of primary outcomes was the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival. Pooled HRs and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random effects models. The I2 statistic was used to measure heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were chosen to illustrate the potential heterogeneity of the risk factors of outcomes. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and Begg's funnel plots. Sensitivity analysis was applied to evaluate the origin of the heterogeneity. We included 27 studies in this meta-analysis. Higher LNRs were significantly associated with a shorter overall survival (OS). High heterogeneity among the studies was identified (I2 = 85.6), and the publication bias was moderate. Subgroup analysis showed similar results, and elevated LNR was associated with late-stage gastric cancer and indicative of a worse prognosis. Univariate meta-regression analysis of OS indicated that both treatment type and ethnicity may be causes of heterogeneity in patients with gastric cancer (p values were 0.005 and 0.008, respectively). LNR was associated with a significantly poorer OS and LNR was an independent predictor of survival in patients with gastric cancer. LNR should be added as one of the parameters to be used in future tumor staging classification systems.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) or chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical resection and then adjuvant therapy is considered the optimal treatment model for locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACRC). A recent total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategy further improved the tumour regression rate preoperatively and reduced local-regional recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, distant metastasis was still high, and little overall survival benefit was obtained from these preoperative treatment models. According to mismatch repair protein expression, MSI-H/dMMR and non-MSI-H/pMMR statuses were defined in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Due to the special features of biologics in MSI-H/dMMR CRC patients, this subgroup of patients achieved little treatment efficacy from chemoradiotherapy but benefited from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The KEYNOTE-177 trial observed favourable survival outcomes in metastatic CRC patients treated with one-line pembrolizumab with tolerable toxicity. Given the better systemic immune function, increased antigenic exposure, and improved long-term memory induction before surgery, neoadjuvant ICI (NAICI) treatment was proposed. The NICHE trial pioneered the use of NAICI treatment in LACRC, and recent reports from several phase II studies demonstrated satisfactory tumour downsizing in CRC. Preclinical rationales and preliminary early-phase human trials reveal the feasibility of NAICI therapy and the therapeutic efficacy provided by this treatment model. Better tumour regression before surgery also increases the possibility of organ preservation for low LARC. However, the optimal treatment strategy and effective biomarker identification for beneficiary selection remain unknown, and potential pitfalls exist, including tumour progression during neoadjuvant treatment due to drug resistance and surgery delay. Given these foundations and questions, further phase II or III trials with large samples need to be conducted to explore the right regimens for the right patients.

Background: This study aims to comprehensively summarize the colorectal survival rate in China. Method: In PubMed and Web of Science, keywords such as “colorectal cancer”, “survival” and “China” were used to search literatures in the past 10 years. Random effect models were selected to summarize 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates, and meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed on the included studies.Results: A total of 16 retrospective and prospective studies providing survival rates for colorectal cancer in China were included. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of colorectal cancer in China were 0.79, 0.72 and 0.62, respectively. In the included studies, the 5-year survival rates of stage I (5474 cases), stage II (9215 cases), stage III (8048 cases), and stage IV (4199 cases) colorectal cancer patients were 0.85, 0.81, 0.57 and 0.30, respectively. Among them, the 5-year survival rates of colorectal cancer were 0.82, 0.76, 0.71, 0.67, 0.66, 0.65 and 0.63 in Tianjin, Beijing, Guangdong, Shandong, Liaoning, Zhejiang and Shanghai, respectively.Conclusion: The 5-year survival rate in China is close to that of most European countries, but still lower than Japan and South Korea, and the gap is gradually narrowing. Region, stage, differentiation, pathological type, and surgical approach can affect 5-year survival in colorectal cancer.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ identifier, CRD42022357789.

The occurrence and progression of tumors can be established through a complex interplay among tumor cells undergoing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasive factors and immune cells. In this study, we employed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatially resolved transcriptomics (ST) to evaluate the pseudotime trajectory and spatial interactive relationship between EMT-invasive malignant tumors and immune cells in primary colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues at different stages (stage I/II and stage III with tumor deposit). Our research characterized the spatiotemporal relationship among different invasive tumor programs by constructing pseudotime endpoint-EMT-invasion tumor programs (EMTPs) located at the edge of ST, utilizing evolution trajectory analysis integrated with EMT-invasion genes. Strikingly, the invasive and expansive process of tumors undergoes remarkable spatial reprogramming of regulatory and immunosuppressive cells, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), regulatory T cells (Treg), and exhausted T cells (Tex). These EMTP-adjacent cell are linked to EMT-related invasion genes, especially the C-X-C motif ligand 1 (CXCL1) and CXCL8 genes that are important for CRC prognosis. Interestingly, the EMTPs in stage I mainly produce an inflammatory margin invasive niche, while the EMTPs in stage III tissues likely produce a hypoxic pre-invasive niche. Our data demonstrate the crucial role of regulatory and immunosuppressive cells in tumor formation and progression of CRC. This study provides a framework to delineate the spatiotemporal invasive niche in CRC samples. Graphical Abstract

The survival rate for colon cancer after radical surgery has been the focus of extensive debate. To assess the postoperative survival and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), we collected clinicopathological information for 2,655 patients. The survival time and potential risk factors for OS were analyzed by using Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards models, best subset regression (BSR), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). The 5-year survival rates of stage I–IV colon cancer were 96.6%, 88.7%, 69.9%, and 34.3%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy improved the survival rate (90.4% vs. 82.4%, with versus without adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively) in stage II patients with high-risk factors. Elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) were significantly associated with worse OS compared with patients without these elevations. Less than 12 versus more than 12 harvested lymph nodes (LNs) affected prognosis (84.6% vs. 89.7%, respectively). Regarding the lymph node ratio (LNR), the 5-year OS rate was 89.2%, 71.5%, 55.8%, and 34.5% in patients with LNR values of 0, 0.3, 0.3–0.7, and >0.7, respectively. We constructed a nomogram comprising the independent factors associated with survival to better predict prognosis. On the basis of these findings, we propose that stage II colon cancer patients without high-risk factors and with both elevated preoperative CEA and CA199 should receive adjuvant therapy. Furthermore, the LNR could complement TNM staging in patients with <12 harvested LNs. Our nomogram might be useful as a new prognosis prediction system for colon cancer patients.