Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) regulate cell cycle progression. During tumor development, altered expression and availability of CDKs strongly contribute to impaired cell proliferation, a hallmark of cancer. In recent years, targeted inhibition of CDKs has shown considerable therapeutic benefit in a variety of tumor entities. Their success is reflected in clinical approvals of specific CDK4/6 inhibitors for breast cancer. This review provides a detailed insight into the molecular mechanisms of CDKs as well as a general overview of CDK inhibition. It also summarizes the latest research approaches and current advances in the treatment of head and neck cancer with CDK inhibitors. Instead of monotherapies, combination therapies with CDK inhibitors may especially provide promising results in tumor therapy. Indeed, recent studies have shown a synergistic effect of CDK inhibition together with chemo- and radio- and immunotherapy in cancer treatment to overcome tumor evasion, which may lead to a renaissance of CDK inhibitors.

The programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis blockade has been implemented in advanced-stage tumor therapy for various entities, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Despite a promising tumor response in a subgroup of HNSCC patients, the majority suffer from disease progression. PD-L1 is known to influence several intrinsic mechanisms in cancer cells, such as proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion. Here, we modulated PD-L1 expression in three HNSCC cell lines with differential intrinsic PD-L1 expression. In addition to an alteration in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker expression, we observed PD-L1-dependent cell spreading, migration and invasion in a spheroid spreading assay on four different coatings (poly-L-lysine, collagen type I, fibronectin and Matrigel^®) and a chemotactic transwell migration/invasion assay. Furthermore, the overexpression of PD-L1 led to increased gene expression and small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) knockdown and decreased gene expression of Rho-GTPases and related proteins in a RT² Profiler™ PCR Array. Rac1 and Rho-GTPase pulldown assays revealed a change in the activation state concordantly with PD-L1 expression. In summary, our results suggest a major role for PD-L1 in favoring cell motility, including cell spreading, migration and invasion. This is presumably caused by altered N-cadherin expression and changes in the activation states of small Rho-GTPases Rho and Rac1.

Recently, considerable progress has been achieved in cancer immunotherapy. Targeted immune checkpoint therapies have been established for several forms of cancers, which resulted in a tremendous positive impact on patient survival, even in more advanced tumor stages. With a better understanding of cellular responses to immune checkpoint therapies, it will soon be feasible to find targeted compounds which will make personalized medicine practicable. This is a great opportunity, but it also sets tremendous challenges on both the scientific and clinical aspects. Head and neck tumors evade immune surveillance through various mechanisms. They contain fewer lymphocytes (natural killer cells) than normal tissue with an accumulation of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells. Standard therapies for HNSCC, such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, are becoming more advantageous by targeting immune checkpoints and employing combination therapies. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the expanded therapeutic options, particularly the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition with various conventional and novel therapeutics for head and neck tumor patients.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a global cancer burden with a 5‐year overall survival rate of around 50%, stagnant for decades. A tumour‐induced immunosuppressive microenvironment contributes to HNSCC progression, with the adenosine (ADO) pathway and an upregulated expression of inhibitory immune checkpoint regulators playing a key role in this context. The correlation between high neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with advanced tumour staging suggests involvement of neutrophils (NØ) in cancer progression. Interestingly, we associated a high NLR with an increased intracellular PD‐L1 localization in primary HNSCC samples, potentially mediating more aggressive tumour characteristics and therefore synergistically favouring tumour progression. Still, further research is needed to harness this knowledge for effective treatments and overcome resistance. Since it is hypothesized that the tumour microenvironment (TME) may be influenced by small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) secreted by tumours (TEX), this study aims to investigate the impact of HNSCC‐derived TEX on NØ and blockade of ADO receptors as a potential strategy to reverse the pro‐tumour phenotype of NØ. UMSCC47‐TEX exhibited CD73 enzymatic activity involved in ADO signalling, as well as the immune checkpoint inhibitor PD‐L1. Data revealed that TEX induce chemotaxis of NØ and the sustained interaction promotes a shift into a pro‐tumour phenotype, dependent on ADO receptors (P1R), increasing CD170^high subpopulation, CD73 and PD‐L1 expression, followed by an immunosuppressive secretome. Blocking A3R reduced CD73 and PD‐L1 expression. Co‐culture experiments with HNSCC cells demonstrated that TEX‐modulated NØ increase the CD73/PD‐L1 axis, through Cyclin D‐CDK4/6 signalling. To support these findings, the CAM model with primary tumour was treated with NØ supernatant. Moreover, these NØ promoted an increase in migration, invasion, and reduced cell death. Targeting P1R on NØ, particularly A3R, exhibited potential therapeutic strategy to counteract immunosuppression in HNSCC. Understanding the TEX‐mediated crosstalk between tumours and NØ offers insights into immunomodulation for improving cancer therapies.

The expression of PD-L1 by tumor cells is mainly associated with its immunosuppressive effect. In fact, PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrated remarkable effects in advanced cancer patients including HNSCC. In this context, irradiation is currently being investigated as a synergistic treatment modality to immunotherapy. However, the majority of HNSCC patients still show little improvement or even hyperprogression. Interestingly, there is increasing evidence for additional cell-intrinsic functions of PD-L1 in tumor cells. In previous studies, we showed that PD-L1 has a strong influence on proliferation, migration, invasion, and survival after irradiation. We demonstrated that cellular expression and localization of PD-L1 differed depending on sensitivity to irradiation. Here, we show that PD-L1 is also differentially expressed during cell cycle progression of HNSCC. Furthermore, cellular localization of PD-L1 also changes depending on a particular cell cycle phase. Moreover, distinct observations occurred depending on the general differentiation status. Overall, the function of PD-L1 cannot be generalized. Rather, it depends on the differentiation status and microenvironment. PD-L1 expression and localization are variable, depending on different factors. These findings may provide insight into why differential response to PD-1/PD-L1 antibody therapy can occur. Detailed understanding of cell-intrinsic PD-L1 functions will further allow antibody-based immunotherapy to be optimized.