Purpose: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are a major public health concern worldwide, which can even lead to death. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of MDROs among isolated GNB in the Security Forces Hospital Dammam (SFHD) and identify its associated risk factors. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on the most commonly isolated GNB in SFHD, Acinetobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli (E. coli), Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, of non-duplicated clinical samples collected from all hospital units throughout the period from January 2017 to December 2018. Data were collected retrospectively from patients’ medical records, and analyses were conducted using the chi-square test and logistic regression models. Results: Of the 1508 GNB included in the study, 969 were multidrug-resistant (MDR; 64.3%). The most commonly identified multidrug-resistant GNB (MDR-GNB) were found in female patients (66.4%) and those aged between 20 and 29 years (21.8%). Urine samples had the highest number of isolated GNB (926 of a total of 1508, 61.4%), and E. coli isolates (53.8%) were the most frequently isolated GNB. Enterobacter spp. had the highest rate of multidrug resistance during the 2 years (64 out of 74, 86.5%). Mechanical ventilation for three or more calendar days was a significant direct risk factor for the development of MDR-GNB (odds ratio [OR]: 2.600, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.124– 6.012, P = 0.025). Conclusion: Multidrug resistance is common among GNBs in SFHD. Antimicrobial stewardship programs in hospitals should be supported and implemented. Medical and public awareness of antibiotic use is another significant way to decrease the burden of MDR.

Background: According to the World Health Organization, by the end of 2020, an estimated 7.8 million people was living with breast cancer diagnosed between 2015 and 2020; in Saudi Arabia, more than fifty percent of cancer cases are detected in late stages, which results in increased mortality rates and reduces the chances of remission. Breast cancer screening using mammography in women fifty years and older worldwide and in women forty years and older in Saudi Arabia shows a significant decrease in morbidity and mortality. However, screening rates are not satisfactory and require further investigation. Methods: This cross-sectional study included women aged 40 years and older. Data was collected through an online survey distributed via social media platforms to all regions of Saudi Arabia. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to examine the difference in the distribution of study variables among women who had received breast screening and those who had not. A logistic regression model was used to estimate the risk of not having breast cancer screening. Results: A total of 973 participants completed the survey. Among respondents, 476 (48.9%) had been screened at least once in their lifetime. The main motivators for screening were: receiving an advice from a physician (41.8%), interest in early detection (39.8%), and receiving free mammography (29.7%). On the other hand, the main barriers to receiving breast cancer screening were: finding screening unnecessary (24.2%), believing screening to be painful (22.1%), and fearing abnormal results (18.6%). Conclusion: We found that nearly half of the targeted screening group had never received mammography screening. These results warrant urgent attention, as early detection is key to better outcomes. Our study’s results aid in better understanding the public’s points of view and inform interventions to improve breast cancer.

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a common occupational hazard and a major cause of deafness among airport workers. However, few studies have been conducted to investigate the various risk factors related to hearing loss. Purpose: the purpose of this study was to measure the prevalence and risk factors of NIHL among Muscat International Airport airside workers. Method: Their daily noise exposure level at the airport was measured, and the time-weighted average (TWA) was calculated for each airside department. A cross-sectional study design involving 312 workers from the eight departments of the airport was chosen and the prevalence of NIHL among workers was assessed. The study participants then completed a self-administered questionnaire that covered their socio-demographic characteristics, occupational exposure history and the health-related risk factors of NIHL. Results: The TWA recorded for the workers was above the accepted limit in some departments, namely, cabin appearance, ramp, line maintenance and hangar. The prevalence of NIHL among participants was 21.79% (n = 68). Of these 68 participants with NIHL, 22.30% were exposed to job-related high noise levels. NIHL was common among participants aged 40 or above (57.35%, n = 39) and high school degree holders (29.60%, n = 29), as well as those who were exposed to higher noise levels (84.89%, n = 191) or who did not wear their hearing protection devices (HPDs) regularly (53.65%, n = 125). Conclusion: around a quarter of our study participants who were exposed to high noise levels suffer from NIHL.

Background: Iron deficiency plays an important role in our body’s immunity. Several studies have shown that it is frequently associated with infections. Objective: This study aimed to discover the effect of iron deficiency on immunity by demonstrating changes occurring in lymphocyte subsets among patients with an established diagnosis of iron deficiency. Methods: A total of 64 iron-deficient patients and 19 healthy controls were included. Complete blood counts, serum iron, ferritin, and total iron-binding capacity were assessed. Lymphocyte subsets were evaluated by flow cytometry. Results: Among iron-deficient patients, the anemic ones (Hb ≤ 11 g/dL) showed significantly lower absolute lymphocyte counts (p=0.013), lower relative and absolute NK-cell counts (p=0.025 and p=0.003, respectively), higher relative T-cell and CD4⁺-cell counts (p=0.026 and p=0.002, respectively). B cells and CD8⁺ T cells were not affected by any iron-deficiency indicators. Iron-deficient anemia patients showed a three- to fourfold increase in risk of having recurrent infections. Conclusion: Iron deficiency has an obvious effect on lymphocyte subsets. Changes in lymphocyte subsets started mainly in response to decreased hemoglobin, rather than decreased ferritin and/or iron. Synchronously decreased hemoglobin and increased total iron-binding capacity led to absolute decreases in total lymphocytes, mainly NK cells, and relative increases in T cells, mainly the helper ones. Monitoring changes in lymphocyte subsets may be helpful in identifying patients at risk of recurrent infections.

Background: Several studies have reported that iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) and its treatment might lead to a distorted reading of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value. Hence, this review aims to systematically investigate the effect of iron replacement therapy (IRT) on HbA1c levels, as the literature is deficient in assessing this clinical phenomenon. Methods: An electronic search of the Cochrane, MEDLINE, and Embase databases was conducted by four independent authors. Results: Among the 8332 articles identified using the search strategy, 10 records (with a total of 2113 participants) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. In nine of the studies, IRT was found to decrease HbA1c levels; in the remaining study, IRT was found to increase HbA1c levels. The effect size of the pooled standardized mean difference in HbA1c levels between the treatment and control groups with IDA was 1.8 (95% CI = −0.5, 2.31). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² and χ² tests, and the resultant values were 98.46% and p = 0.09, respectively. Additionally, the mean difference between the HbA1c levels (pre-IRT and post-IRT) showed a drop in the HbA1c levels which ranged from 1.20 to 0.43 mg/dL. Conclusions: The results suggest that IRT decreases HbA1c levels, and it is helpful in treating IDA patients with poor glycemic control. Accordingly, the results provide an added perspective on antidiabetic medication dosing and physicians’ interpretation of initially elevated HbA1c values.