Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)

Dr. Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2019 in Nature Conservation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SRSevertsov Institute of Ecology and Evoluton of RAS
Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evoluton of RAS
VRViatcheslav Vladimirovich Rozhnov
Viatcheslav Vladimirovich Rozhnov
ILIgor A. Lavrinenko
Igor A. Lavrinenko
KRKomarov Botanical Institute of RAS
Komarov Botanical Institute of RAS
VRVladimir Yu. Razzhivin
Vladimir Yu. Razzhivin
ATAndrei G. Tatarinov
Andrei G. Tatarinov

29 April 2023 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAlexey Kudrin
Alexey Kudrin
EPEvgenia Perminova
Evgenia Perminova
ATAnastasia Taskaeva
Anastasia Taskaeva
A(Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)
Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)
TKTatiana Konakova
Tatiana Konakova
The processes of matter and energy metabolism in forest ecosystems are largely dependent on the activity of the complex of invertebrates associated with litter and soil. To quantify the effect of forest harvesting on soil fauna, we used a meta-analysis to examine a database of 720 responses to harvesting collected from 52 publications from boreal and temperate forests. Overall, forest harvesting was found to decrease the abundance of soil fauna while not affecting its richness. However, the reaction of soil fauna to forest harvesting differed significantly among the taxonomic groups, with negative, neutral, and positive effects observed. We found that the negative effect of forest harvesting on soil fauna increased with decreasing body size. In addition, the type of forest and harvesting practice played important roles in driving the responses of soil biota to forest harvesting. The abundance of Nematoda, Oribatida, and Enchytraeidae recovered to control values occurring approximately 10 years after harvesting. Despite the limitations of the dataset, the results obtained from our meta-analysis expand our understanding of the reaction of soil fauna to forest harvesting.

1 February 2013 in Contemporary Problems of Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
A(Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)
Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)
ATAnastasia Taskaeva
Anastasia Taskaeva
ELE. M. Lapteva
E. M. Lapteva
SDS. V. Degteva
S. V. Degteva
The species composition, abundance and, vertical distribution of Collembola (53 species), Lumbricidae (6 species), and Elateridae (12 species) are estimated in alluvial soils of the middle taiga...

10 August 2016
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
A(Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)
Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)
ELElena Morisovna Lapteva
Elena Morisovna Lapteva
SDSvetlana Degteva
Svetlana Degteva
ATAnastasia Taskaeva
Anastasia Taskaeva
AKAlexey Kudrin
Alexey Kudrin
FKFluza Khabibullina
Fluza Khabibullina
Biodiversity of Floodplain Soils in the European North‐East of Russia | InTechOpen, Published on: 2016-08-10. Authors: Alla Kolesnikova, Elena Lapteva, Svetlana Degteva, et

1 November 2021 in Contemporary Problems of Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
A(Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)
Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)
TKT. N. Konakova
T. N. Konakova
Analysis of the state of soil macrofauna during a period of reduced emissions from pulp and paper production revealed changes in the structural parameters of invertebrate communities in pine and spruce forests in the impact, buffer, and background areas. The macrofauna of pine and spruce forests is characterized by a high similarity and low diversity at the level of large taxa. This is typical feature of coniferous forests in the middle taiga subzone. The species richness of invertebrate communities is estimated for the period from 2003–2019. It is comparable for the impact and buffer areas and is almost twice lower than that of the background area. The total number of macrofauna and taxonomic groups varies by periods and areas of load. A change of dominant species was observed in the pine forests of the impact area in 2007 and 2010. Lithobius curtipes C.L. Koch, 1847 and Pella humeralis (Gravenhorst, 1802) predominated in the buffer and background areas, Philonthus rotundicollis (Menetries, 1832) and Philonthus politus (Linnaeus, 1758) predominated in the impact area. No changes of dominants were detected in pine forests in 2018 and in spruce forests in 2006, 2010, and 2019. Dendrobaena octaedra (Savigny, 1826) and L. curtipes were dominants in the impact, buffer, and background areas. The dominance of zoophages was typical for all of the studied plots. The number of some taxa (Lumbricidae, Diplopoda, Elateridae) indicates an increase in the relative abundance of saprophages in soils of coniferous forests in the impact area. Soils of the background area with high natural acidity are unsuitable for invertebrates activity. Favorable conditions are created for them near the pulp and paper plant due to neutralizing soil acidity.

1 January 2019 in Proceedings of the Komi Science Centre of the Ural Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
A(Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)
Alla Ditts (Kolesnikova)
IRInstitute of Biology Komi SC UB RAS
Institute of Biology Komi SC UB RAS
SDS.V. Degteva
S.V. Degteva