Peder Bacher

Peder Bacher

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2009 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPeder Bacher
Peder Bacher
HMHenrik Madsen
Henrik Madsen
HNHenrik Aalborg Nielsen
Henrik Aalborg Nielsen

1 July 2011 in Energy and Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPeder Bacher
Peder Bacher
HMHenrik Madsen
Henrik Madsen

1 July 2017 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPCaroline Persson
Caroline Persson
PBPeder Bacher
Peder Bacher
TSTakahiro Shiga
Takahiro Shiga
HMHenrik Madsen
Henrik Madsen

1 November 2020 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKenneth Leerbeck
Kenneth Leerbeck
PBPeder Bacher
Peder Bacher
RJRune Grønborg Junker
Rune Grønborg Junker
GGGoran Goranović
Goran Goranović
OCOlivier Corradi
Olivier Corradi
HMHenrik Madsen
Henrik Madsen

1 October 2013 in Energy and Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPeder Bacher
Peder Bacher
HMHenrik Madsen
Henrik Madsen
HNHenrik Aalborg Nielsen
Henrik Aalborg Nielsen
BPBengt Perers
Bengt Perers

19 January 2022 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Daniel Vázquez PomboDaniel Vázquez Pombo
Daniel Vázquez Pombo
Henrik W. BindnerHenrik W. Bindner
Henrik W. Bindner
Sergiu SpataruSergiu Spataru
Sergiu Spataru
PSPoul Sorensen
Poul Sorensen
PBPeder Bacher
Peder Bacher
Machine Learning (ML)-based methods have been identified as capable of providing up to one day ahead Photovoltaic (PV) power forecasts. In this research, we introduce a generic physical model of a PV system into ML predictors to forecast from one to three days ahead. The only requirement is a basic dataset including power, wind speed and air temperature measurements. Then, these are recombined into physics informed metrics able to capture the operational point of the PV. In this way, the models learn about the physical relationships of the different features, effectively easing training. In order to generalise the results, we also present a methodology evaluating this physics informed approach. We present a study-case of a PV system in Denmark to validate our claims by extensively evaluating five different ML methods: Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and a hybrid CNN–LSTM. The results show consistently how the best predictors use the proposed physics-informed features disregarding the particular ML-method, and forecasting horizon. However, also, how there is a threshold regarding the number of previous samples to be included that appears as a convex function.