This study investigated the capability of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to simulate seven different heavy precipitation (PRE) events that occurred across East Africa in the summer of 2020. The WRF model outputs were evaluated against high-resolution satellite-based observations, which were obtained from prior evaluations of several satellite observations with 30 stations’ data. The synoptic conditions accompanying the events were also investigated to determine the conditions that are conducive to heavy PRE. The verification of the WRF output was carried out using the area-related root mean square error (RMSE)-based fuzzy method. This method quantifies the similarity of PRE intensity distribution between forecast and observation at different spatial scales. The results showed that the WRF model reproduced the heavy PRE with PRE magnitudes ranging from 6 to >30 mm/day. The spatial pattern from the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks-Cloud Classification-Climate Data Record (PERSIANN-CCS-CDR) was close to that of the WRF output. The area-related RMSE with respect to observation showed that the error in the model tended to reduce as the spatial scale increased for all the events. The WRF and high-resolution satellite data had an obvious advantage when validating the heavy PRE events in 2020. This study demonstrated that WRF may be used for forecasting heavy PRE events over East Africa when high resolutions and subsequent simulation setups are used.

This study adopts a two-way approach to CORDEX-CORE RegCM4-7 seasonal precipitation simulations’ Added Value (AV) analysis over Africa, which aims to quantify potential improvements introduced by the downscaling approach at high and low resolution, using satellite-based observational products. The results show that RegCM4-7 does add value to its driving Global Climate Models (GCMs) with a positive Added Value Coverage (AVC) ranging between 20 and 60% at high resolution, depending on the season and the boundary conditions. At low resolution, the results indicate an increase in the positive AVC by up to 20% compared to the high-resolution results, with an up to 8% decrease for instances where an increase is not observed. Typical climate zones such as West Africa, Central Africa, and Southern East Africa, where improvements by Regional Climate Models (RCMs) are expected due to strong dependence on mesoscale and fine-scale features, show positive AVC greater than 20%, regardless of the season and the driving GCM. These findings provide more evidence for confirming the hypothesis that the RCMs AV is influenced by their internal physics rather than being the product of a mere disaggregation of large-scale features provided by GCMs. Although the results show some dependencies to the driving GCMs relating to their equilibrium climate sensitivity nature, the findings at low resolutions similar to the native GCM resolutions make the influence of internal physics more important. The findings also feature the CORDEX-CORE RegCM4-7 precipitation simulations’ potential in bridging the quality and resolution gap between coarse GCMs and high-resolution remote sensing datasets. Even if further post-processing activities, such as bias correction, may still be needed to remove persistent biases at high resolution, using upscaled RCMs as an alternative to GCMs for large-scale precipitation studies over Africa can be insightful if the AV and other performance statistics are satisfactory for the intended application.