While bracing is the standard conservative treatment for acute osteoporotic compression fracture, the efficacy of different brace treatments has not been extensively studied. We aimed to clarify and compare the preventive effect of the different brace treatments on the deformity of the vertebral body and other clinical results in this patient cohort. This multicenter nationwide prospective randomized study included female patients aged 65–85 years with acute one-level osteoporotic compression fractures. We assigned patients within four weeks of injury to either a rigid-brace treatment or a soft-brace treatment. The main outcome measure was the anterior vertebral body compression percentage at 48 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included scores on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), visual analog scale (VAS) for lower back pain, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). A total of 141 patients were assigned to the rigid-brace group, whereas 143 patients were assigned to the soft-brace group. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome and secondary outcome measures between groups. In conclusion, among patients with fresh vertebral compression fractures, the 12-week rigid-brace treatment did not result in a statistically greater prevention of spinal deformity, better quality of life, or lesser back pain than soft-brace.

Japan's largest platform for academic e-journals: J-STAGE is a full text database for reviewed academic papers published by Japanese societies

The benefits of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) as a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis have been unclear. We sought to evaluate the invasiveness and tolerability of XLIF with percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) compared with traditional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Fifty-six consecutive patients underwent open PLIF and 46 consecutive patients underwent single-staged treatment with XLIF with posterior PPS fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, and were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. We analyzed postoperative serum makers for muscle damage and inflammation, postoperative surgical pain, and performance status. A Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were obtained at the time of hospital admission and 1 year after surgery. Intraoperative blood loss (51 ± 41 ml in the XLIF/PPS group and 206 ± 191 ml in the PLIF group), postoperative WBC counts and serum CRP levels in the XLIF/PPS group were significantly lower than in the PLIF group. Postoperative serum CK levels were significantly lower in the XLIF/PPS group on postoperative days 4 and 7. Postoperative recovery of performance was significantly greater in the XLIF/PPS group than in the PLIF group from postoperative days 2 to 7. ODI and visual analog scale (VAS) score (lumbar) 1 year after surgery were significantly lower in the XLIF/PPS group compared with the PLIF group. The XLIF/PPS procedure is advantageous to minimize blood loss and muscle damage, with consequent earlier recovery of daily activities and reduced incidence of low back pain after surgery than with the open PLIF procedure.

Study Design: A retrospective observational study of a cohort of consecutive patients. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the correlations between clinical outcomes of spinal surgery to correct adult spinal deformity (ASD) including mechanical complications and coronal malalignment and clarify the risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment. Summary of Background Data: Despite the coronal malalignment seen regularly in adult patients who have undergone spinal surgery to correct spinal deformity, the associations between coronal malalignment, and clinical outcomes including mechanical complications after the surgery have remained unclear until now. To understand the associations between coronal malalignment and outcomes of surgery to correct ASD, and risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment has substantial clinical importance. Materials and Methods: We included data from 121 consecutive patients who had undergone spinal surgery to correct ASD and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Iliac screws were used for pelvic fixation in all cases. The coronal balance was defined as the horizontal distance between the midpoint of C7 and the center of the sacrum on the coronal plane, and coronal malalignment was defined as when the absolute coronal balance was >20 mm. Preoperative radiographic parameters, surgical features, and clinical outcomes including mechanical complications were compared between groups of patients with coronal balance and those with malalignment. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were used to clarify risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment. Results: Postoperative coronal malalignment had no significant association with the clinical outcome as evaluated by a Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index but had a significant association with the frequency of rod fracture. A large preoperative coronal imbalance (malalignment), L5 coronal tilt angle, and use of lateral lumbar interbody fusion were found as risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment. Conclusion: Postoperative coronal malalignment had no significant association with the clinical outcome as evaluated by the Oswestry Disability Index and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire but was significantly associated with the frequency of rod fracture. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study using consecutive patients. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of lumbar lordosis (LL) construction on postoperative reciprocal progression of thoracic kyphosis (TK) and occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) following surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Summary of Background Data: A large postoperative TK has been reported as an iatrogenic risk factor for PJK following surgery for ASD. Therefore, knowing how to anticipate and regulate postoperative reciprocal progression in TK with LL restorative surgery is important to prevent PJK. The LL proportion including distribution of the lordosis (lordosis distribution index: LDI) in the lower (L4–S1) and upper (L1–L3) arcs has been known as important because it alters the distribution of load. However, the influence of postoperative LL construction on postoperative reciprocal change in TK resulting in PJK is largely unknown. Methods: Sixty-six consecutive patients with ASD treated with LL restorative surgery with a fusion level consistently selected from T8–T10 to the pelvis and followed-up for a minimum of 1 year. Abnormal PJK was evaluated according to the Boachie-Adjei classification. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index were measured at 1 year after surgery. Results: The prevalence of PJK in the present study was 33.3%. Outcomes of patients with PJK were significantly worse than in patients without PJK, regardless of PJK grade. Postoperative reciprocal progression in TK with LL restorative surgery was found. Preoperative risk factors of PJK were older age and smaller sacral slope angle. Postoperative risk factors for PJK included increased TK and decreased LDI. We found a strong correlation between postoperative LDI and reciprocal progression of TK resulting in PJK. Conclusions: Postoperative LDI is crucial to prevent excess reciprocal progression of TK resulting in PJK.