The R403Q mutation in β‐myosin heavy chain was the first mutation to be identified as responsible for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (FHC). In spite of extensive work on the functional sequelae of this mutation, the mechanism by which the mutant protein causes the disease has not been definitely identified. Here we directly compare contraction and relaxation mechanics of single myofibrils from left ventricular samples of one patient carrying the R403Q mutation to those from a healthy control heart. Tension generation and relaxation following sudden increase and decrease in [Ca²⁺] were much faster in the R403Q myofibrils with relaxation rates being the most affected parameters. The results show that the R403Q mutation leads to an apparent gain of protein function but a greater energetic cost of tension generation. Increased energy cost of tension generation may be central to the FHC disease process, help explain some unresolved clinical observations, and carry significant therapeutic implications.

Human atrial and ventricular contractions have distinct mechanical characteristics including speed of contraction, volume of blood delivered and the range of pressure generated. Notably, the ventricle expresses predominantly β-cardiac myosin while the atrium expresses mostly the α-isoform. In recent years exploration of the properties of pure α- & β-myosin isoforms have been possible in solution, in isolated myocytes and myofibrils. This allows us to consider the extent to which the atrial vs ventricular mechanical characteristics are defined by the myosin isoform expressed, and how the isoform properties are matched to their physiological roles. To do this we Outline the essential feature of atrial and ventricular contraction; Explore the molecular structural and functional characteristics of the two myosin isoforms; Describe the contractile behaviour of myocytes and myofibrils expressing a single myosin isoform; Finally we outline the outstanding problems in defining the differences between the atria and ventricles. This allowed us consider what features of contraction can and cannot be ascribed to the myosin isoforms present in the atria and ventricles.