Frederik Gailly

Dr. Frederik Gailly

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2019 in Information Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMichaël Verdonck
Michaël Verdonck
FGFrederik Gailly
Frederik Gailly
RPRobert Pergl
Robert Pergl
GGGiancarlo Guizzardi
Giancarlo Guizzardi
BMBeatriz Martins
Beatriz Martins
OPOscar Pastor
Oscar Pastor

4 December 2015 in Applied Ontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MVMichaël Verdonck
Michaël Verdonck
FGFrederik Gailly
Frederik Gailly
SCSergio de Cesare
Sergio de Cesare
GPGeert Poels
Geert Poels
Accepted by: Giancarlo Guizzardi Ontology-driven conceptual modeling (ODCM) is still a relatively new research domain in the field of information systems and there is still much discussion on how the research in ODCM should be performed and what the


28 July 2015 in Information Systems Frontiers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJan Claes
Jan Claes
Irene VanderfeestenIrene Vanderfeesten
Irene Vanderfeesten
FGFrederik Gailly
Frederik Gailly
Paul GrefenPaul Grefen
Paul Grefen
GPGeert Poels
Geert Poels
After observing various inexperienced modelers constructing a business process model based on the same textual case description, it was noted that great differences existed in the quality of the produced models. The impression arose that certain quality issues originated from cognitive failures during the modeling process. Therefore, we developed an explanatory theory that describes the cognitive mechanisms that affect effectiveness and efficiency of process model construction: the Structured Process Modeling Theory (SPMT). This theory states that modeling accuracy and speed are higher when the modeler adopts an (i) individually fitting (ii) structured (iii) serialized process modeling approach. The SPMT is evaluated against six theory quality criteria.

1 September 2008 in Journal of Information Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FGFrederik Gailly
Frederik Gailly
WLWim Laurier
Wim Laurier
GPGeert Poels
Geert Poels
FUFrederik Gailly, Wim Laurier, Geert PoelsGhent UniversityGhent UniversityGhent University
Frederik Gailly, Wim Laurier, Geert PoelsGhent UniversityGhent UniversityGhent University
GGGuido L. Geerts
Guido L. Geerts
Recent Resource, Event, Agent (REA) research has focused on defining and theoretically justifying the ontology's contents. Here, we elaborate on more practical issues related to REA. First, we classify REA and its applications using ontology classification schemes and application frameworks. This analysis clarifies REA's application potential but also reveals weaknesses that may impede its operationalization. Next, we propose a new REA ontology specification that uses a Unified Modeling Language (UML) profile for graphically representing ontologies. This new specification is more complete and precise than previously available specifications, without compromising understandability. It can easily be transformed into a machine-readable representation for automatic processing, which is a prerequisite for the successful application of REA in business modeling, software engineering, knowledge representation, and interoperability creation. The paper ends with a proof of concept application in which a formal Ontology Web Language (OWL) specification of REA is fed into the Prote´ge´ knowledge representation tool and subsequently used for the development of an enterprise schema.

27 May 2015
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
SMSteven Mertens
Steven Mertens
FGFrederik Gailly
Frederik Gailly
GPGeert Poels
Geert Poels