Laura  Elnitski

Dr. Laura Elnitski

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 September 2005 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BGBelinda Giardine
Belinda Giardine
CRCathy Riemer
Cathy Riemer
RHRoss C Hardison
Ross C Hardison
RBRichard Burhans
Richard Burhans
LELaura Elnitski
Laura Elnitski
ANAnton Nekrutenko
Anton Nekrutenko
Accessing and analyzing the exponentially expanding genomic sequence and functional data pose a challenge for biomedical researchers. Here we describe an interactive system, Galaxy, that combines the power of existing genome annotation databases with a simple Web portal to enable users to search remote resources, combine data from independent queries, and visualize the results. The heart of Galaxy is a flexible history system that stores the queries from each user; performs operations such as intersections, unions, and subtractions; and links to other computational tools. Galaxy can be accessed at http://g2.bx.psu.edu.

1 April 2004 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMathieu Blanchette
Mathieu Blanchette
WKW. James Kent
W. James Kent
CRCathy Riemer
Cathy Riemer
LELaura Elnitski
Laura Elnitski
ASArian F.A. Smit
Arian F.A. Smit
WMWebb Miller
Webb Miller
We define a “threaded blockset,” which is a novel generalization of the classic notion of a multiple alignment. A new computer program called TBA (for “threaded blockset aligner”) builds a threaded blockset under the assumption that all matching segments occur in the same order and orientation in the given sequences; inversions and duplications are not addressed. TBA is designed to be appropriate for aligning many, but by no means all, megabase-sized regions of multiple mammalian genomes. The output of TBA can be projected onto any genome chosen as a reference, thus guaranteeing that different projections present consistent predictions of which genomic positions are orthologous. This capability is illustrated using a new visualization tool to view TBA-generated alignments of vertebrateHoxclusters from both the mammalian and fish perspectives. Experimental evaluation of alignment quality, using a program that simulates evolutionary change in genomic sequences, indicates that TBA is more accurate than earlier programs. To perform the dynamic-programming alignment step, TBA runs a stand-alone program called MULTIZ, which can be used to align highly rearranged or incompletely sequenced genomes. We describe our use of MULTIZ to produce the whole-genome multiple alignments at the Santa Cruz Genome Browser.

21 April 2014 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKManolis Kellis
Manolis Kellis
BWBarbara Wold
Barbara Wold
MSMichael P. Snyder
Michael P. Snyder
BBBradley E. Bernstein
Bradley E. Bernstein
AKAnshul Kundaje
Anshul Kundaje
RHRoss C Hardison
Ross C Hardison
With the completion of the human genome sequence, attention turned to identifying and annotating its functional DNA elements. As a complement to genetic and comparative genomics approaches, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Project was launched to contribute maps of RNA transcripts, transcriptional regulator binding sites, and chromatin states in many cell types. The resulting genome-wide data reveal sites of biochemical activity with high positional resolution and cell type specificity that facilitate studies of gene regulation and interpretation of noncoding variants associated with human disease. However, the biochemically active regions cover a much larger fraction of the genome than do evolutionarily conserved regions, raising the question of whether nonconserved but biochemically active regions are truly functional. Here, we review the strengths and limitations of biochemical, evolutionary, and genetic approaches for defining functional DNA segments, potential sources for the observed differences in estimated genomic coverage, and the biological implications of these discrepancies. We also analyze the relationship between signal intensity, genomic coverage, and evolutionary conservation. Our results reinforce the principle that each approach provides complementary information and that we need to use combinations of all three to elucidate genome function in human biology and disease.

14 August 2003 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JTJ. W. Thomas
J. W. Thomas
JTJ. W. Touchman
J. W. Touchman
RBR. W. Blakesley
R. W. Blakesley
GBG. G. Bouffard
G. G. Bouffard
SBS. M. Beckstrom-Sternberg
S. M. Beckstrom-Sternberg
EGE. D. Green
E. D. Green
The systematic comparison of genomic sequences from different organisms represents a central focus of contemporary genome analysis. Comparative analyses of vertebrate sequences can identify coding1,2,3,4,5,6 and conserved non-coding4,6,7 regions, including regulatory elements8,9,10, and provide insight into the forces that have rendered modern-day genomes6. As a complement to whole-genome sequencing efforts3,5,6, we are sequencing and comparing targeted genomic regions in multiple, evolutionarily diverse vertebrates. Here we report the generation and analysis of over 12 megabases (Mb) of sequence from 12 species, all derived from the genomic region orthologous to a segment of about 1.8 Mb on human chromosome 7 containing ten genes, including the gene mutated in cystic fibrosis. These sequences show conservation reflecting both functional constraints and the neutral mutational events that shaped this genomic region. In particular, we identify substantial numbers of conserved non-coding segments beyond those previously identified experimentally, most of which are not detectable by pair-wise sequence comparisons alone. Analysis of transposable element insertions highlights the variation in genome dynamics among these species and confirms the placement of rodents as a sister group to the primates.

1 January 2003 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRoss C Hardison
Ross C Hardison
KRKrishna M. Roskin
Krishna M. Roskin
SYShan Yang
Shan Yang
MDMark Diekhans
Mark Diekhans
WKW. James Kent
W. James Kent
DHDavid Haussler
David Haussler
Six measures of evolutionary change in the human genome were studied, three derived from the aligned human and mouse genomes in conjunction with the Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium, consisting of (1) nucleotide substitution per fourfold degenerate site in coding regions, (2) nucleotide substitution per site in relics of transposable elements active only before the human–mouse speciation, and (3) the nonaligning fraction of human DNA that is nonrepetitive or in ancestral repeats; and three derived from human genome data alone, consisting of (4) SNP density, (5) frequency of insertion of transposable elements, and (6) rate of recombination. Features 1 and 2 are measures of nucleotide substitutions at two classes of “neutral” sites, whereas 4 is a measure of recent mutations. Feature 3 is a measure dominated by deletions in mouse, whereas 5 represents insertions in human. It was found that all six vary significantly in megabase-sized regions genome-wide, and many vary together. This indicates that some regions of a genome change slowly by all processes that alter DNA, and others change faster. Regional variation in all processes is correlated with, but not completely accounted for, by GC content in human and the difference between GC content in human and mouse. [Supplemental material is available online atwww.genome.organdhttp://www.soe.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/covariation/.]

1 January 2003 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KFKelly A. Frazer
Kelly A. Frazer
LELaura Elnitski
Laura Elnitski
DCDeanna M. Church
Deanna M. Church
IDInna Dubchak
Inna Dubchak
RHRoss C Hardison
Ross C Hardison
With the availability of whole-genome sequences for an increasing number of species, we are now faced with the challenge of decoding the information contained within these DNA sequences. Comparative analysis of DNA sequences from multiple species at varying evolutionary distances is a powerful approach for identifying coding and functional noncoding sequences, as well as sequences that are unique for a given organism. In this review, we outline the strategy for choosing DNA sequences from different species for comparative analyses and describe the methods used and the resources publicly available for these studies.