Objectives.Apo Egenes involved in lipoprotein synthesis and metabolism are considered one of the candidates to CHD. However, the results remain conflicting.Methods. We performed this meta-analysis based on 30 published studies including 11,804 CHD patients and 17,713 controls.Results. Compared with the wild genotype E3/3, the variant genotypesApoEE3/4 and E4/4 were associated with 22% and 45% increased risk of CHD, respectively (E3/4 versus E3/3: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.15–1.29; E4/4 versus E3/3: OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.23–1.71). Besides, compared withε3 allele, carriers with theε4 allele had a 46% increased risk of CHD (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.28–1.66), while theε2 had no significantly decreased risk of CHD. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity,ε4 had a 25% increased risk of CHD in Caucasians (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.11–1.41), and the effects were more evident in Mongolians (OR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.89–2.77). Theε2 allele had a decreased risk of CHD in Caucasians (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.96), but not in Mongolians.Conclusions. The analysis suggested thatApoEε4 mutation was associated with the increased risk of CHD, whileApoEε2 allele had a decreased risk of CHD just in Caucasians.

Although observational studies have shown positive associations between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), the causal relationship is still uncertain owing to the susceptibility to confounding and reverse causation. This study aimed to examine the potential causality of BMI on AF by conducting a two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR) study. Methods: The independent genetic variants associated with BMI (n = 303) at the genome-wide significant level were derived as instrumental variables (IV) from the Genetic Investigation of Anthropometric Traits (GIANT) consortium consisting of 681,275 individuals of European ancestry. We then derived the outcome data from a GWAS meta-analysis comprised of 60,620 cases and 970,216 controls of European ancestry. The TSMR analyses were performed in five methods, namely inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, MR-Egger regression, the weighted median estimator (WME), the generalized summary data-based Mendelian randomization (GSMR), and the robust adjusted profile score (RAPS), to investigate whether BMI was causally associated with the risk of AF. Results: We found a genetically determined 1–standard deviation (SD) increment of BMI causally increased a 42.5% risk of AF (OR = 1.425; 95% CI, 1.346 to 1.509) based on the IVW method, which was consistent with the results of MR-Egger regression, WME, GSMR, as well as RAPS. The Mendelian randomization assumptions did not seem to be violated. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that higher BMI causally increased the risk of AF, suggesting control of BMI and obesity for prevention of AF.

The increased stroke risk associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) burden exceeding 5 min is a matter of debate. In addition, the potential linear or nonlinear relationship between AF burden and stroke risk has been largely unexplored. To determine the association between AF burden > 5 min and the increased risk of stroke and explore the potential dose-response relationship between these two factors. Sixteen studies from six databases with 53141 subjects (mean age 65 years) were included. Fifteen studies were observational studies, and one was a randomized controlled trial study. The potential nonlinear dose-response association was characterized using a restricted cubic splines regression model. AF burden for each 1 h and 2 h was associated with an increased risk of stroke. Trial sequential analysis with a random-effect model was used to evaluate the robustness of the evidence from the included 16 studies. AF burden > 5 min was associated with an increased risk of clinical AF [adjusted risk ratio (RR) = 4.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.26-7.74]. However, no association was found with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted RR = 1.55, 95%CI: 0.87-2.75). Patients with AF burden > 5 min had an increased risk of stroke (adjusted RR = 2.49, 95%CI: 1.79-3.47). Moreover, a dose-response analysis showed that the increased stroke risk was paralleled by an increase in AF burden at a rate of 2.0% per hour (P_nonlinear = 0.656, RR = 1.02, 95%CI: 1.01-1.03). Trial sequential analysis provided robust evidence of the association between AF burden > 5 min and an increased risk of stroke. AF burden was a significant risk factor for clinical AF and future stroke. A significant linear association was documented between increased AF burden and risk of future stroke.

We performed univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the association between blood lipids and risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), Apolipoprotein A1, and Apolipoprotein B. Methods: Data on the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to blood lipids were obtained from the UK Biobank study with more than 300,000 subjects of White British European ancestry, and data for AF were from the latest meta-analysis of Genome-wide association study (GWASs) with six independent cohorts with more than 1,000,000 subjects of European ancestry. The univariable MR analysis was conducted to explore whether genetic evidence of individual lipid-related traits was significantly associated with AF risks and multivariable MR analysis with three models was performed to assess the independent effects of lipid-related traits. Results: The IVW estimate showed that genetically predicted LDL-C (OR: 1.016, 95% CI: 0.962–1.073, p = 0.560), HDL-C (OR: 0.951, 95% CI: 0.895–1.010, p = 0.102), TG (OR: 0.961, 95% CI: 0.889–1.038, p = 0.313), Apolipoprotein A1 (OR: 0.978, 95% CI: 0.933–1.025, p = 0.356), and Apolipoprotein B (OR: 1.008, 95% CI: 0.959–1.070, p = 0.794) were not causally associated with the risk of AF. Sample mode (OR: 0.852, 95% CI: 0.731–0.993, p = 0.043) and weighted mode (OR: 0.907, 95% CI: 0.841–0.979, p = 0.013) showed that a 1-unit increase in TG (mmol/L) was causally associated with a 14.8% and 9.3% relative decrease in AF risk, respectively. The multivariable MR analysis with model 1, 2, and 3 indicated that TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, Apolipoprotein A1, and Apolipoprotein B were not associated with the lower risk for AF. Conclusions: Our multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis (MVMR) finding suggested no genetic evidence of lipid traits was significantly associated with AF risk. Furthermore, more work is warranted to confirm the potential association between lipid traits and AF risks.