Gagandeep Singh

Dr. Gagandeep Singh

City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2019 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAaron Lewis
Aaron Lewis
MRMustafa Raoof
Mustafa Raoof
PIPhilip H. G. Ituarte
Philip H. G. Ituarte
JWJohn Williams
John Williams
LMLaleh Melstrom
Laleh Melstrom
Gagandeep SinghGagandeep Singh
Gagandeep Singh
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine outcomes of primary tumor resection in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors across all primary tumor sites. Background: Primary tumor resection (PTR) may offer a survival benefit in metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs); however, few studies have examined the effect of primary site and grade on resection and survival. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with metastatic GI-NETs at presentation between 2005 and 2011 using the California Cancer Registry (CCR) dataset merged with California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) inpatient longitudinal database. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate (MV) analyses were performed using the Pearson Chi-squared tests and Cox proportional hazard, respectively. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: A total of 854 patients with GI-NET metastases on presentation underwent 392 PTRs. Liver metastases occurred in 430 patients; 240 received liver treatment(s). PTR improved OS in patients with untreated metastases (median survival 10 vs 38 months, P < 0.001). On MV analysis adjusted for demographics, tumor stage, grade, chemotherapy use, Charlson comorbidity index, primary tumor location, or treatment of liver metastases, PTR with/without liver treatment improved OS in comparison to no treatment [hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, P < 0.001 and 0.39, P < 0.001, respectively]. PTR offered a survival benefit across all grades (low-grade, HR 0.38, P = 0.002 and high-grade, HR 0.62, P = 0.025) Conclusion: PTR in GI-NET is associated with a better survival, with or without liver treatment, irrespective of grade. This study supports the resection of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic GI-NETs, independent of liver treatment.

1 May 2017 in JAMA Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMustafa Raoof
Mustafa Raoof
SDSinziana Dumitra
Sinziana Dumitra
PIPhilip H. G. Ituarte
Philip H. G. Ituarte
LMLaleh Melstrom
Laleh Melstrom
SWSusanne Warner
Susanne Warner
Gagandeep SinghGagandeep Singh
Gagandeep Singh
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs) are the second most common type of primary liver cancer.1 Approximately 10% of all cholangiocarcinomas are intrahepatic, amounting to 2000 to 3000 cases each year in the United States with an increasing incidence worldwide.2,3 Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas are resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and surgical resection is considered to be the mainstay of therapy, providing the only chance of cure. However, most patients have advanced disease at diagnosis and are not candidates for surgery. Resectability is defined by the ability to completely resect ICC while leaving an adequate liver remnant. Current consensus considers noncontiguous extrahepatic disease, multiple bilobar or multicentric tumors, or lymph node metastases beyond the primary echelon as contraindications to resection.4 The role of surgical resection for large or multifocal ICCs or those invading adjacent organs by direct extension remains unclear. The decision to pursue resection is complex because of unclear oncologic benefit and substantial rates of operative morbidity and mortality.

1 October 2014
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HSHans F. Schoellhammer
Hans F. Schoellhammer
YFYuman Fong
Yuman Fong
Gagandeep SinghGagandeep Singh
Gagandeep Singh
Pancreatic resections are some of the most technically challenging operations performed by surgeons, and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) are not uncommon, developing in approximately 13% of pancreaticoduodenectomies and 30% of distal pancreatectomies. Multiple trials of various operative techniques in the creation of the pancreatic ductal anastomosis have been conducted throughout the years, and herein we review the literature and outcomes data regarding these techniques, although no one technique of pancreatic ductal anastomosis has been shown to be superior in decreasing rate of POPF. Similarly, we review the literature regarding techniques of pancreatic closure after distal pancreatectomy. Again, no one technique has been shown to be superior in preventing POPF; however the use of buttressing material on the pancreatic staple line in the future may be a successful means of decreasing POPF. We review adjunctive techniques to decrease POPF such as pancreatic ductal stenting, the use of various topical biologic glues, and the use of somatostatin analogue medications. We conclude that future trials will need to be conducted to find optimal techniques to decrease POPF, and meticulous attention to intra-operative details and post-operative care by surgeons is necessary to prevent POPF and optimally care for patients undergoing pancreatic resection.

17 May 2017 in Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJeremy King
Jeremy King
Michael BouvetMichael Bouvet
Michael Bouvet
Gagandeep SinghGagandeep Singh
Gagandeep Singh
JWJohn C. Williams
John C. Williams

1 June 2019 in HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMustafa Raoof
Mustafa Raoof
Gagandeep SinghGagandeep Singh
Gagandeep Singh
Rising trends in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma incidence and mortality: getting at the root cause

1 September 2020 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LTLucas W. Thornblade
Lucas W. Thornblade
SWSusanne Warner
Susanne Warner
LMLaleh G Melstrom
Laleh G Melstrom
Gagandeep SinghGagandeep Singh
Gagandeep Singh
YFYuman Fong
Yuman Fong
MRMustafa Raoof
Mustafa Raoof
Black patients in the US experience lower rates of survival after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC).1 Disparity in outcomes after cancer surgery is associated with a complex interaction of patient, socioeconomic, and health-system factors, including lower rates of referral to cancer specialists,2 higher risk factors for CRC, and patient reported barriers, including fear of cancer and its treatment, costs, and the burdens of transportation and childcare during therapy.3