Remifentanil has been implicated as causing intraoperative bradyarrhythmias, but little information is available regarding its cardiac electrophysiological effects. Thus, we evaluated the cardiac electrophysiological properties before and after remifentanil in a closed-chest porcine model. Eighteen Landrace–Large pigs were premedicated with ketamine and anaesthetized with propofol (4.5 mg kg⁻¹ bolus followed by 13 mg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹). After instrumentation, an electrophysiological evaluation was performed under propofol and repeated after remifentanil (bolus of 1 µg kg⁻¹, followed by an infusion of 0.5 µg kg⁻¹ min⁻¹). We evaluated sinus node function [sinus node recovery time (SNRT) and sinoatrial conduction time (SACT)], atrioventricular (AV) nodal function [AH intervals during sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial pacing, Wenckebach cycle length (WCL), and effective refractory periods (ERP)], atrial, His-Purkinje, and ventricular conduction and refractoriness. Significant changes between ‘propofol protocol’ and ‘propofol+remifentanil protocol’ were evaluated. Remifentanil caused a significant increase in sinus cycle length (21%, P=0.001) and a significant prolongation of SNRT (43%, P=0.001), corrected SNRT (136%, P=0.003), SACT (40%, P=0.005), AH interval during SR (17%, P=0.02), AH interval during atrial pacing (25%, P=0.01), and ventricular ERP (12%, P=0.004). There was a tendency towards a prolongation of WCL and AV nodal refractoriness. Similar significant changes were observed in a reference group of seven animals in which sevoflurane was used instead of propofol. No significant changes were observed in atrial parameters, His-Purkinje function, parameters of intraventricular conduction, and QT intervals. Remifentanil depresses sinus node function and most parameters of AV nodal function. This contributes to an explanation for clinical observations of remifentanil-related severe bradyarrhythmias.

Cisplatin is one of the most widely used chemotherapeutic agents in oncology, although its nephrotoxicity limits application and dosage. We present the results of a clinical study on prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC-cisplatin). Prophylaxis was with imipenem/cilastatin. Cilastatin is a selective inhibitor of renal dehydropeptidase I in the proximal renal tubule cells that can reduce the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin. Unfortunately, cilastatin is not currently marketed alone, and can only be administered in combination with imipenem. The study has a retrospective part that serves as a control (n = 99 patients receiving standard surgical prophylaxis) and a prospective part with imipenem/cilastatin prophylaxis corresponding to the study group (n = 85 patients). In both groups, we collected specific data on preoperative risk factors of renal damage, fluid management, hemodynamic control, and urine volume during surgery (including the hyperthermic chemotherapy perfusion), as well as data on hemodynamic and renal function during the first seven days after surgery. The main finding of the study is that cilastatin may exert a nephroprotective effect in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal cisplatin perfusion. Creatinine values remained lower than in the control group (ANOVA test, p = 0.037). This translates into easier management of these patients in the postoperative period, with significantly shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay.

To establish a temporal safety window for cryoablation at minimal temperatures and to assess the electrophysiological and histological changes as a function of the application duration. Twenty mini-pigs underwent AV nodal cryoablation at −80°C without prior cryomapping. The duration of the cryoapplication following atrioventricular block (AVB) was randomized to 0, 10, 20, 40, or 60 s. Atrioventricular block was obtained in all animals after a median of 3 (1–8 interquartile range) applications. One week later, AV nodal conduction fully recovered in animals with application duration <10 s, whereas persistent AVB incidence increased as a function of time in animals with longer applications duration. Cryoablation application duration following AVB was the only independent predictor of persistent AVB (OR, 1.116; 95% CI, 1.013–1.229; P = 0.026). There was no difference in lesion location or size between animals with vs. those without persistent AVB at 1 week. However, animals randomized to longer application duration demonstrated higher degree of cell destruction and fibrotic content. In this closed-chest pig model, there was a relation between cryoapplication duration following AVB at −80°C and recovery of conduction. A safety window of at least 10 s was observed in all cases.