Stewart Fielder

Dr. Stewart Fielder

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 February 2021 in Environmental DNA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMeaghan Duncan
Meaghan Duncan
AFAshley M. Fowler
Ashley M. Fowler
JHJulian M Hughes
Julian M Hughes
MBMatt K. Broadhurst
Matt K. Broadhurst
JDJoseph DiBattista
Joseph DiBattista
EFElise M Furlan
Elise M Furlan
Environmental DNA (eDNA) has revolutionized our ability to identify the presence and distributions of terrestrial and aquatic organisms. Recent evidence suggests the concentration of eDNA could also provide a rapid, cost‐effective indicator of abundance and/or biomass for fisheries stock assessments. Globally, fisheries resources are under immense pressure, and their sustainable harvest requires accurate information on the sizes of fished stocks. However, in many cases the required information remains elusive because of a reliance on imprecise or costly fishery‐dependent and independent data. Here, we review the literature describing relationships between eDNA concentrations and fish abundance and/or biomass, as well as key influencing factors, as a precursor to determining the broader utility of eDNA for monitoring fish populations. We reviewed 63 studies published between 2012 and 2020 and found 90% identified positive relationships between eDNA concentrations and the abundance and/or biomass of focal species. Key influencing biotic factors included the taxon examined as well as their body size, distribution, reproduction, and migration. Key abiotic factors mostly comprised hydrological processes affecting the dispersal and persistence of eDNA, especially water flow and temperature, although eDNA collection methods were also influential. The cumulative influence of these different factors likely explains the substantial variability observed in eDNA concentrations, both within and among studies. Nevertheless, there is considerable evidence to support using eDNA as an ancillary tool for assessing fish population abundance and/or biomass across discrete spatio‐temporal scales, following preliminary investigations to determine species‐ and context‐specific factors influencing the eDNA abundance/biomass relationship. Advantages of eDNA monitoring relative to other approaches include reduced costs, increased efficiencies, and nonlethal sampling.

1 November 2005 in Aquaculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFStewart Fielder
Stewart Fielder
WBWilliam J. Bardsley
William J. Bardsley
GAGeoff L. Allan
Geoff L. Allan
PPPatricia M. Pankhurst
Patricia M. Pankhurst

1 September 2001 in Aquaculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFStewart Fielder
Stewart Fielder
WBWilliam J Bardsley
William J Bardsley
GAGeoff L Allan
Geoff L Allan

1 August 2002 in Aquaculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFStewart Fielder
Stewart Fielder
WBWilliam J Bardsley
William J Bardsley
GAGeoff L Allan
Geoff L Allan
PPPatricia M Pankhurst
Patricia M Pankhurst

1 September 2008 in Aquaculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMark Booth
Mark Booth
BTB.J. Tucker
B.J. Tucker
GAG.L. Allan
G.L. Allan
SFStewart Fielder
Stewart Fielder

15 August 2005 in Journal of Fish Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTM. D. Taylor
M. D. Taylor
PPP. J. Palmer
P. J. Palmer
SFStewart Fielder
Stewart Fielder
ISI. M. Suthers
I. M. Suthers