The impact of nutrition information on public health is partly determined by the population's level of nutrition literacy (NL), which involves functional NL (such as knowledge of dietary guidelines) and critical NL (such as the ability to distinguish between evidence-based nutrition information and alternative facts). The aim of this cross-sectional study was to describe aspects of functional and critical NL and predictors of NL scores among university students and employees. We recruited at different university campuses, 414 students and 112 employees, of which 80 % were females and 69 % were in the ages of 18–30 years. In total, 82 % reported knowledge about where to find information on nutrition issues, and 70 % were familiar with Norwegian dietary guidelines. Being female, having higher age, being highly physically active and studying or working within health sciences were significant predictors of higher levels of functional nutrition knowledge. Significantly more women than men found it difficult to judge if media information on nutritional issues could be trusted (69 v. 54 %) and found it hard to distinguish between scientific and non-scientific information about diet (60 v. 42 %). Our findings indicate that for a sample of university students and employees, affiliation with health sciences, being female, having a higher age and being physically active were associated with higher functional NL. Women did, however, seem to have lower levels of some aspects of critical NL, e.g. how to critically judge nutrition information. A more thorough assessment of NL in university students and employees should therefore be conducted.

A first-time acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a severe diagnosis that leads to initiation or intensification of lipid-lowering medication to prevent recurrent events. Individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) already use high-intensity lipid-lowering medication at the time of an incident AMI due to their diagnosis. Hence, we hypothesized that compared with matched non-FH controls, individuals with genetically verified FH have increased mortality and risk of recurrent AMI after their first event. The study population comprised 4871 persons with genetically verified FH, and 96,251 age and sex matched controls randomly selected from the Norwegian population. Data were obtained from the Cardiovascular Disease in Norway Project, the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Incidence of AMI, all-cause mortality and recurrent AMI after incident AMI were analyzed for the period 2001-2017. Incidence and mortality were compared using hazard ratios (HR) from Cox regression. Risk of recurrent AMI was compared using sub-hazard ratios (SHR) from competing risk regression with death as a competing event. We identified 232 individuals with FH and 2118 controls with an incident AMI [HR 2.10 (95% CI 1.83-2.41)]. Among survivors ≥29 days after the incident AMI, both mortality [HR = 1.45 (95% CI: 1.07-1.95)] and recurrent AMI [SHR = 2.53 (95% CI: 1.88-3.41)] were significantly increased among individuals with FH compared with non-FH controls. Individuals with FH have increased mortality and increased risk of recurrent AMI after the first AMI event compared with controls. These findings call for intensive follow-up of individuals with FH following an AMI.

SFAs play the leading role in 1 of the greatest controversies in nutrition science. Relative to PUFAs, SFAs generally increase circulating concentrations of LDL cholesterol, a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, the purpose of regulatory mechanisms that control the diet-induced lipoprotein cholesterol dynamics is rarely discussed in the context of human adaptive biology. We argue that better mechanistic explanations can help resolve lingering controversies, with the potential to redefine aspects of research, clinical practice, dietary advice, public health management, and food policy. In this paper we propose a novel model, the homeoviscous adaptation to dietary lipids (HADL) model, which explains changes in lipoprotein cholesterol as adaptive homeostatic adjustments that serve to maintain cell membrane fluidity and hence optimal cell function. Due to the highly variable intake of fatty acids in humans and other omnivore species, we propose that circulating lipoproteins serve as a buffer to enable the rapid redistribution of cholesterol molecules between specific cells and tissues that is necessary with changes in dietary fatty acid supply. Hence, circulating levels of LDL cholesterol may change for nonpathological reasons. Accordingly, an SFA-induced raise in LDL cholesterol in healthy individuals could represent a normal rather than a pathologic response. These regulatory mechanisms may become disrupted secondarily to pathogenic processes in association with insulin resistance and the presence of other ASCVD risk factors, as supported by evidence showing diverging lipoprotein responses in healthy individuals as opposed to those with metabolic disorders such as insulin resistance and obesity. Corresponding with the model, we suggest alternative contributing factors to the association between elevated LDL cholesterol concentrations and ASCVD, involving dietary factors beyond SFAs, such as an increased endotoxin load from diet-gut microbiome interactions and subsequent chronic low-grade inflammation that interferes with fine-tuned signaling pathways.

Individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), causing severely elevated LDL-C, are expected to have a higher risk of ischemic stroke. The risk of hemorrhagic stroke and impact of statin use are, however, not known. We aimed to investigate the risk of incident total, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in individuals with FH compared to controls, and to explore the association between cumulative statin use and risk of total stroke in FH. This prospective cohort study consists of 4186 individuals with genetically verified FH and 82 180 age and sex matched controls followed from 2008 to 2018 for incident stroke. Daily defined doses (DDD) described cumulative statin exposure: 0-5000 DDD ("low"), 5000-10,000 DDD ("intermediate"), and >10 000 DDD ("high"). Results were presented as hazard ratio (95% CI) derived from Cox proportional hazards models. Individuals with FH did not have a higher risk of total stroke (1.16 (0.95-1.43) nor ischemic stroke (1.11 (0.88-1.38). Excess risk of hemorrhagic stroke was observed (1.63 (1.07, 2.48) but attenuated after adjusting for antithrombotic medication (1.25 (0.81, 1.93). Among individuals with FH, there was no association between statin use and total stroke for intermediate vs. low DDD [0.69 (0.32, 1.48)] or for high vs. low DDD [0.83 (0.41, 1.67)]. No significant excess risk of incident total and ischemic stroke in FH, and no difference in total stroke risk among the FH population with low, intermediate, and high statin exposure were observed. The observed relationship between FH and hemorrhagic stroke was no longer significant after adjusting for use of anti-thrombotic medication.

Background: One-third or more of breast cancer survivors report stress and other psychological and physical complaints that can negatively impact their quality of life. Psychosocial stress management interventions, shown to mitigate the negative impact of these complaints, can now be delivered as accessible and convenient (for the patient and provider) eHealth interventions. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), Coping After Breast Cancer (CABC), 2 modified versions of the stress management eHealth intervention program StressProffen were created: one with predominantly cognitive behavioral stress management content (StressProffen-cognitive behavioral therapy intervention [StressProffen-CBI]) and another with predominantly mindfulness-based stress management content (StressProffen-mindfulness-based intervention [StressProffen-MBI]). Objective: This study aims to investigate the effects in breast cancer survivors of using StressProffen-CBI and StressProffen-MBI compared with a control group (treatment as usual). Methods: Women diagnosed with breast cancer (stage I-III, unequivocally human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive or estrogen receptor-negative tumors) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) aged 21-69 years who completed the Cancer Registry of Norway–initiated health survey on quality of life are invited to the CABC trial about 7 months after diagnosis. Women who give consent to participate are randomized (1:1:1) to either the StressProffen-CBI, StressProffen-MBI, or control group. Both StressProffen interventions consist of 10 modules of stress management content delivered through text, sound, video, and images. The primary outcome is between-group changes in perceived stress at 6 months, assessed with Cohen 10-item Perceived Stress Scale. The secondary outcomes comprise changes in quality of life, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep, neuropathy, coping, mindfulness, and work-related outcomes approximately 1, 2, and 3 years after diagnosis. Long-term effects of the interventions on work participation, comorbidities, relapse or new cancers, and mortality will be assessed using data from national health registries. Results: Recruitment is scheduled from January 2021 to May 2023. The goal is to recruit 430 participants (100 in each group). As of April 14 2023, 428 participants have been enrolled. Conclusions: The CABC trial is possibly the largest ongoing psychosocial eHealth RCT in patients with breast cancer. If 1 or both interventions prove to be effective in reducing stress and improving psychosocial and physical complains, the StressProffen eHealth interventions could be beneficial, inexpensive, and easily implementable tools for breast cancer survivors when coping with late effects after cancer and cancer treatments. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04480203; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04480203 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/47195

According to guidelines, individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) shall receive lifestyle intervention and intensive lipid-lowering treatment from early in life to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease. Our aim was to study if treatment of FH also could affect risk of lifestyle-related cancer. We presented cumulative incidence of total cancer and lifestyle-related cancer sites in individuals with genetically verified FH (n = 5531) compared with age and sex matched controls (n = 108354). Individuals with FH had 20% lower risk of smoking-related cancer compared with the control population [HR 0.80 (95% CI, 0.65–0.98)], in particular men with FH at 40–69 years at age of diagnosis with HR 0.69 (95% CI, 0.49–0.97). The FH population and controls had similar rates of total cancer [HR 0.97 (95% CI, 0.86–1.09)], cancer related to poor diet [HR 0.82 (95% CI, 0.59–1.15)], cancer related to physical inactivity [HR 0.93 (95% CI, 0.73–1.18)], alcohol-related cancer [HR 0.98 (95% CI, 0.80–1.22)] and cancer related to obesity [HR 1.03 (95% CI, 0.89–1.21)]. In summary, we found reduced risk of smoking-related cancer in individuals with FH, most likely due to a lower prevalence of smoking. Implications of these findings can be increased motivation and thus compliance to treatment of hypercholesterolemia.