Miguel Garzón

Prof. Dr. Miguel Garzón

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 June 2008 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMiguel Ángel García-Cabezas
Miguel Ángel García-Cabezas
Patricia Martinez-SanchezPatricia Martinez-Sanchez
Patricia Martinez-Sanchez
MSMiguel Ángel Sánchez-González
Miguel Ángel Sánchez-González
MGMiguel Garzón
Miguel Garzón
CCCarmen Cavada
Carmen Cavada
We recently identified the thalamic dopaminergic system in the human and macaque monkey brains, and, based on earlier reports on the paucity of dopamine in the rat thalamus, hypothesized that this dopaminergic system was particularly developed in primates. Here we test this hypothesis using immunohistochemistry against the dopamine transporter (DAT) in adult macaque and rat brains. The extent and density of DAT-immunoreactive (-ir) axons were remarkably greater in the macaque dorsal thalamus, where the mediodorsal association nucleus and the ventral motor nuclei held the densest immunolabeling. In contrast, sparse DAT immunolabeling was present in the rat dorsal thalamus; it was mainly located in the mediodorsal, paraventricular, ventral medial, and ventral lateral nuclei. The reticular nucleus, zona incerta, and lateral habenular nucleus held numerous DAT-ir axons in both species. Ultrastructural analysis in the macaque mediodorsal nucleus revealed that thalamic interneurons are a main postsynaptic target of DAT-ir axons; this suggests that the marked expansion of the dopamine innervation in the primate in comparison to the rodent thalamus may be related to the presence of a sizable interneuron population in primates. We remark that it is important to be aware of brain species differences when using animal models of human brain disease.


21 June 1999 in Journal of Comparative Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMiguel Garzón
Miguel Garzón
RVRoxanne A. Vaughan
Roxanne A. Vaughan
GUGeorge R. Uhl
George R. Uhl
MKMichael J. Kuhar
Michael J. Kuhar
VPVirginia M. Pickel
Virginia M. Pickel

25 August 2010 in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBeatriz Pardo
Beatriz Pardo
TRTiago B Rodrigues
Tiago B Rodrigues
LCLaura Contreras
Laura Contreras
MGMiguel Garzón
Miguel Garzón
ILIrene Llorente-Folch
Irene Llorente-Folch
JSJorgina Satrustegui
Jorgina Satrustegui
The glutamate–glutamine cycle faces a drain of glutamate by oxidation, which is balanced by the anaplerotic synthesis of glutamate and glutamine in astrocytes. De novo synthesis of glutamate by astrocytes requires an amino group whose origin is unknown. The deficiency in Aralar/ AGC1, the main mitochondrial carrier for aspartate–glutamate expressed in brain, results in a drastic fall in brain glutamine production but a modest decrease in brain glutamate levels, which is not due to decreases in neuronal or synaptosomal glutamate content. In vivo13C nuclear magnetic resonance labeling with 13C2acetate or (1-13C) glucose showed that the drop in brain glutamine is due to a failure in glial glutamate synthesis. Aralar deficiency induces a decrease in aspartate content, an increase in lactate production, and lactate-to-pyruvate ratio in cultured neurons but not in cultured astrocytes, indicating that Aralar is only functional in neurons. We find that aspartate, but not other amino acids, increases glutamate synthesis in both control and aralar-deficient astrocytes, mainly by serving as amino donor. These findings suggest the existence of a neuron-to-astrocyte aspartate transcellular pathway required for astrocyte glutamate synthesis and subsequent glutamine formation. This pathway may provide a mechanism to transfer neuronal-born redox equivalents to mitochondria in astrocytes.

1 February 2001 in Sleep Medicine Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FRFernando Reinoso-Suárez
Fernando Reinoso-Suárez
IAIsabel de Andrés
Isabel de Andrés
MRMargarita L Rodrigo-Angulo
Margarita L Rodrigo-Angulo
MGMiguel Garzón
Miguel Garzón

1 January 2011 in Frontiers in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IAIsabel T. De Andrés
Isabel T. De Andrés
MGMiguel Garzón
Miguel Garzón
FRFernando Reinoso-Suárez
Fernando Reinoso-Suárez
The state of non-REM sleep (NREM), or slow wave sleep, is associated with a synchronized EEG pattern in which sleep spindles and/or K complexes and high-voltage slow wave activity (SWA) can be recorded over the entire cortical surface. In humans, NREM is subdivided into stages 2 and 3–4 (presently named N3) depending on the proportions of each of these polygraphic events. NREM is necessary for normal physical and intellectual performance and behavior. An overview of the brain structures involved in NREM generation shows that the thalamus and the cerebral cortex are absolutely necessary for the most significant bioelectric and behavioral events of NREM to be expressed; other structures like the basal forebrain, anterior hypothalamus, cerebellum, caudal brain stem, spinal cord and peripheral nerves contribute to NREM regulation and modulation. In NREM stage 2, sustained hyperpolarized membrane potential levels resulting from interaction between thalamic reticular and projection neurons gives rise to spindle oscillations in the membrane potential; the initiation and termination of individual spindle sequences depends on corticothalamic activities. Cortical and thalamic mechanisms are also involved in the generation of EEG delta SWA that appears in deep stage 3–4 (N3) NREM; the cortex has classically been considered to be the structure that generates this activity, but delta oscillations can also be generated in thalamocortical neurons. NREM is probably necessary to normalize synapses to a sustainable basal condition that can ensure cellular homeostasis. Sleep homeostasis depends not only on the duration of prior wakefulness but also on its intensity, and sleep need increases when wakefulness is associated with learning. NREM seems to ensure cell homeostasis by reducing the number of synaptic connections to a basic level; based on simple energy demands, cerebral energy economizing during NREM sleep is one of the prevalent hypotheses to explain NREM homeostasis.