Javier Ruiz-López

Prof. Javier Ruiz-López

Department of Optics, Faculty of Science, Edificio Mecenas, Campus Fuente Nueva S/N, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2021 in Dental Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLCristina Lucena
Cristina Lucena
JRJavier Ruiz-López
Javier Ruiz-López
RPRosa Pulgar
Rosa Pulgar
ABAlvaro Della Bona
Alvaro Della Bona
MPMaría del Mar Pérez
María del Mar Pérez

7 December 2020 in Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LDLeticia B. Durand
Leticia B. Durand
JRJavier Ruiz-López
Javier Ruiz-López
BPBibiana G. Perez
Bibiana G. Perez
AIAna M. Ionescu
Ana M. Ionescu
FCFrancisco Carrillo‐Pérez
Francisco Carrillo‐Pérez
MPMaría M. Pérez
María M. Pérez

1 July 2019 in Dental Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RERosa Pulgar Encinas
Rosa Pulgar Encinas
CLCristina Lucena
Cristina Lucena
CECristina Espinar
Cristina Espinar
OPOscar E. Pecho
Oscar E. Pecho
JRJavier Ruiz-López
Javier Ruiz-López
MPMaría M. Pérez
María M. Pérez

26 August 2024 in Journal of Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Maria Tejada-CasadoMaria Tejada-Casado
Maria Tejada-Casado
LHLuis Javier Herrera
Luis Javier Herrera
FCFrancisco Carrillo-Perez
Francisco Carrillo-Perez
JRJavier Ruiz-López
Javier Ruiz-López
Razvan GhineaRazvan Ghinea
Razvan Ghinea
MPMaría del Mar Pérez
María del Mar Pérez

1 February 2021 in Journal of Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJavier Ruiz-López
Javier Ruiz-López
RERosa Pulgar Encinas
Rosa Pulgar Encinas
CLCristina Lucena
Cristina Lucena
PPPriscilla Pelaez-Cruz
Priscilla Pelaez-Cruz
JPJUAN DE LA CRUZ CARDONA PÉREZ
JUAN DE LA CRUZ CARDONA PÉREZ
Razvan GhineaRazvan Ghinea
Razvan Ghinea

31 May 2022 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJavier Ruiz-López
Javier Ruiz-López
MPMaría del Mar Pérez
María del Mar Pérez
CLCristina Lucena
Cristina Lucena
RERosa Pulgar Encinas
Rosa Pulgar Encinas
ALAna López-Toruño
Ana López-Toruño
Razvan GhineaRazvan Ghinea
Razvan Ghinea
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate in vivo the color agreement between natural teeth and dental shade guides by means of visual and instrumental coverage error ( $$\mathrm{CE}$$CE ) index.Materials and methods: The color of the middle third of 735 incisors was visually determined by two evaluators using the Vita Classical (VC) and Vita 3D Master (V3DM) shade guides. The color match between the natural tooth and the shade tab was rated as poor (P), good (G), or optimum (O) by each observer. CIE color coordinates of the target teeth and shade tabs of VC and V3DM were instrumentally measured using a clinical spectrophotometer. Visual ( $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{V}}$$CEV ) and instrumental ( $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{I}}$$CEI ) coverage error indexes were computed using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 metrics for both shade guides. For $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{V}}$$CEV calculation, only the concordant inter-observer determination on tooth shade rated as O–O or O–G was used. The results were evaluated using perceptibility (PT, $${\mathrm{\Delta E}}_{\mathrm{ab}}^{*}$$ΔEab∗ = 1.2, $${\mathrm{\Delta E}}_{00}$$ΔE00 = 0.8) and acceptability (AT, $${\mathrm{\Delta E}}_{\mathrm{ab}}^{*}$$ΔEab∗ = 2.7, $${\mathrm{\Delta E}}_{00}$$ΔE00 = 1.8) color thresholds for dentistry.Results: VC and V3DM exhibited $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{I}}$$CEI (2.5, 3.2, and 3.2, 2.7 CIELAB units; 1.9, 2.3, and 2.8, 2.4 CIEDE2000 units, respectively, for O–O and O–G match) and $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{V}}$$CEV (4.7, 4.8, and 4.1, 4.6 CIELAB units; 3.3, 3.4, and 3.4, 3.6 CIEDE2000 units, respectively, for O–O and O–G match) values greater than 50:50% AT for both color difference formulas. $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{I}}$$CEI contributes more than 50% (53.2–82.4% range) to the $${\mathrm{CE}}_{\mathrm{V}}$$CEV value. This contribution depends on the shade guide used and the quality of the visual rating.Conclusions: The evaluated shade guides exhibited visual coverage errors above acceptability thresholds, largely due to the contribution of the instrumental coverage error to the visual coverage error.Clinical relevance: It necessary to further improve commercially available dental shade guides to facilitate achievement of satisfactory esthetics results in clinical practice.