Irene Chiolo

Dr. Irene Chiolo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2011 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ICIrene Chiolo
Irene Chiolo
AMA. Minoda
A. Minoda
SCSerafin U. Colmenares
Serafin U. Colmenares
APAris Polyzos
Aris Polyzos
Sylvain CostesSylvain Costes
Sylvain Costes
GKGary H. Karpen
Gary H. Karpen

20 June 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCChristopher P. Caridi
Christopher P. Caridi
CDCarla D’agostino
Carla D’agostino
TRTaehyun Ryu
Taehyun Ryu
Grzegorz ZapotocznyGrzegorz Zapotoczny
Grzegorz Zapotoczny
LDLaetitia Delabaere
Laetitia Delabaere
ICIrene Chiolo
Irene Chiolo

2 March 2011 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TRThomas Robert
Thomas Robert
FVFabio Vanoli
Fabio Vanoli
ICIrene Chiolo
Irene Chiolo
GSGhadeer Shubassi
Ghadeer Shubassi
KBKara Bernstein
Kara Bernstein
MFMarco Foiani
Marco Foiani
Protein acetylation is mediated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and deacetylases (HDACs), which influence chromatin dynamics, protein turnover and the DNA damage response. ATM and ATR mediate DNA damage checkpoints by sensing double-strand breaks and single-strand-DNA–RFA nucleofilaments, respectively. However, it is unclear how acetylation modulates the DNA damage response. Here we show that HDAC inhibition/ablation specifically counteracts yeast Mec1 (orthologue of human ATR) activation, double-strand-break processing and single-strand-DNA–RFA nucleofilament formation. Moreover, the recombination protein Sae2 (human CtIP) is acetylated and degraded after HDAC inhibition. Two HDACs, Hda1 and Rpd3, and one HAT, Gcn5, have key roles in these processes. We also find that HDAC inhibition triggers Sae2 degradation by promoting autophagy that affects the DNA damage sensitivity of hda1 and rpd3 mutants. Rapamycin, which stimulates autophagy by inhibiting Tor, also causes Sae2 degradation. We propose that Rpd3, Hda1 and Gcn5 control chromosome stability by coordinating the ATR checkpoint and double-strand-break processing with autophagy.

26 October 2015 in Nature Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TRTaehyun Ryu
Taehyun Ryu
BSBrett Spatola
Brett Spatola
LDLaetitia Delabaere
Laetitia Delabaere
KBKatherine Bowlin
Katherine Bowlin
HHHannah Hopp
Hannah Hopp
ICIrene Chiolo
Irene Chiolo
Heterochromatin mostly comprises repeated sequences prone to harmful ectopic recombination during double-strand break (DSB) repair. In Drosophila cells, ‘safe’ homologous recombination (HR) repair of heterochromatic breaks relies on a specialized pathway that relocalizes damaged sequences away from the heterochromatin domain before strand invasion. Here we show that heterochromatic DSBs move to the nuclear periphery to continue HR repair. Relocalization depends on nuclear pores and inner nuclear membrane proteins (INMPs) that anchor repair sites to the nuclear periphery through the Smc5/6-interacting proteins STUbL/RENi. Both the initial block to HR progression inside the heterochromatin domain, and the targeting of repair sites to the nuclear periphery, rely on SUMO and SUMO E3 ligases. This study reveals a critical role for SUMOylation in the spatial and temporal regulation of HR repair in heterochromatin, and identifies the nuclear periphery as a specialized site for heterochromatin repair in a multicellular eukaryote.

1 February 2005 in Genes & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGiordano Liberi
Giordano Liberi
GMGiulio Maffioletti
Giulio Maffioletti
CLChiara Lucca
Chiara Lucca
ICIrene Chiolo
Irene Chiolo
ABAnastasia Baryshnikova
Anastasia Baryshnikova
MFMarco Foiani
Marco Foiani
S-phase cells overcome chromosome lesions through replication-coupled recombination processes that seem to be assisted by recombination-dependent DNA structures and/or replication-related sister chromatid junctions. RecQ helicases, including yeast Sgs1 and human BLM, have been implicated in both replication and recombination and protect genome integrity by preventing unscheduled mitotic recombination events. We have studied the RecQ helicase-mediated mechanisms controlling genome stability by analyzing replication forks encountering a damaged template in sgs1 cells. We show that, in sgs1 mutants, recombination-dependent cruciform structures accumulate at damaged forks. Their accumulation requires Rad51 protein, is counteracted by Srs2 DNA helicase, and does not prevent fork movement. Sgs1, but not Srs2, promotes resolution of these recombination intermediates. A functional Rad53 checkpoint kinase that is known to protect the integrity of the sister chromatid junctions is required for the accumulation of recombination intermediates in sgs1 mutants. Finally, top3 and top3 sgs1 mutants accumulate the same structures as sgs1 cells. We suggest that, in sgs1 cells, the unscheduled accumulation of Rad51-dependent cruciform structures at damaged forks result from defective maturation of recombination-dependent intermediates that originate from the replication-related sister chromatid junctions. Our findings might contribute to explaining some of the recombination defects of BLM cells.

1 April 2010 in Mutation Research - Reviews in Mutation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sylvain CostesSylvain Costes
Sylvain Costes
ICIrene Chiolo
Irene Chiolo
JPJ.M. Pluth
J.M. Pluth
MBM.H. Barcellos-Hoff
M.H. Barcellos-Hoff
BJBurkhard Jakob
Burkhard Jakob