Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has widely affected the global public health system, especially the emergency medical service (EMS), which has been the first responders since 2020. However, this pandemic persists with still limited studies on its impact on EMS. This study aimed to compare the number of EMS patients and the operation periods of Bangkok EMS in Thailand between 2020 (severe COVID-19 pandemic) and 2019 (prepandemic). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with severe COVID-19 were collected from the emergency medical information system of Bangkok EMS center. Data were compared between the two periods. The COVID-19 pandemic period (study period) spanned from January 01, 2020 to December 31, 2020, whereas the control period referred to the same period in the previous year (January 01, 2019 to December 31, 2019). Results: A total of 178,594 patients were serviced by EMS, with 93,288 during the study period and 85,306 during the control period. The study period had more EMS patients overall by 9.36% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.16– 9.55) and significantly more EMS patients per day, with a mean difference of 21.19 (254.90 ± 25.55 vs 233.71 ± 23.49; 95% CI: 17.63– 24.76, p < 0.001), than the control period. Furthermore, all EMS operation periods studied were significantly longer during the study period. Conclusion: During COVID-19 pandemic period, a significantly increased number of EMS patients compared to one during non-COVID-19 pandemic period for both traumatic and non-traumatic patients, as well as remarkably increased every EMS operation period of both groups during COVID-19 pandemic period were found in the present study. From this knowledge, provision of necessary EMS resources and preparation of emergency staff to be ready for management of future pandemics should be obtained to reduce EMS operation period in the future pandemics.

Background: Traffic accident patients place a tremendous burden on health care services because they require substantial, rapid, and effective evaluation, management, and treatment by emergency medical services (EMS) to decrease morbidity and mortality rates. This study investigated the 1-month survival rate and factors related to the survival of traffic accident patients managed by EMS. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of traffic accident patients serviced by the Surgico Medical Ambulance and Rescue Team (SMART) at Vajira Hospital, Bangkok, from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. The data were collected from EMS patient care reports recorded using the emergency medical triage protocol as well as the criteria-based dispatch response codes in Thailand. Survival data at 1 month were obtained from electronic medical records. Results: Of the 340 traffic accident patients who fulfilled the study criteria, 314 (92.35%) were alive at 1 month. A multivariable analysis using multiple logistic regression identified prehospital level of consciousness, airway management, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation as factors associated with survival. Unresponsive patients had a lower survival rate than responsive patients (adjusted odds ratio [OR_adj] = 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05– 0.56, p = 0.004). Prehospital airway management and cardiopulmonary resuscitation reduced the survival rate by 0.30 and 0.10 times, respectively (OR_adj = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.09– 0.97, p = 0.045 and OR_adj = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02– 0.47, p = 0.004, respectively). Conclusion: Traffic accident patients had a high survival rate at 1 month. We identified three factors regarding EMS treatment which were related to increased survival: a prehospital responsive level of consciousness, no prehospital airway management, and no prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Therefore, the development of standard guidelines for the management of traffic accident patients by EMS is crucial to increase the survival rate of traffic accident patients.

Purpose: Delays in emergency medical service (EMS) directly affect life-threatening emergencies. Delays also indirectly affect the perception and satisfaction of patients and their relatives, which are important qualitative EMS indicators. Patients and Methods: For this cross-sectional study, data was collected from May 1 to July 31, 2021, through questionnaires developed by the authors. The study sample consisted of relatives of EMS patients. The primary objective was the perceived EMS response time, which was compared to the actual EMS response time. The secondary objective was the relatives’ perceptions and feelings regarding the waiting time. Results: During study period, the sample was 165 relatives of patients managed by EMS. The mean perceived EMS response time of 18.28 ± 8.10 min was significantly longer than the mean actual response time of 14.44 ± 4.86 min (p < 0.001). The positive correlation between the perceived and actual times was low but statistically significant (p < 0.001) with a correlation coefficient of 0.315 (95% CI 0.170– 0.446). The overall satisfaction level was high (<![CDATA[$\overline {\rm{x}} \,{\rm{ = }}\,{\rm{4}}{\rm{.47}}$]]>, standard deviation 0.63). The mean perceived EMS response time compares with the high-to-highest satisfaction levels of relatives was significantly lower than the mean perceived EMS response time compares with the lowest-to-middle satisfaction levels of relatives (17.83 ± 8.05 and 22.50 ± 7.47 min, respectively; p = 0.028). Conclusion: The perceived EMS response time was longer than the actual response time, with a low correlation. However, the relatives’ overall satisfaction level was high.

Background:Medical professionals can use mass-casualty triage systems to assist them in prioritizing patients from mass-casualty incidents (MCIs). Correct triaging of victims will increase their chances of survival. Determining the triage system that has the best performance has proven to be a difficult question to answer. The Advanced Prehospital Triage Model (Modelo Extrahospitalario de Triaje Avanzado; META) and Sort, Assess, Lifesaving Interventions, Treatment/Transport (SALT) algorithms are the most recent triage techniques to be published. The present study aimed to evaluate the META and SALT algorithms’ performance and statistical agreement with various standards. The secondary objective was to determine whether these two MCI triage systems predicted patient outcomes, such as mortality, length-of-stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.Methods:This retrospective study used patient data from the trauma registry of an American College of Surgeons Level 1 trauma center, from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. The sensitivity, specificity, and statistical agreement of the META and SALT triage systems to various standards (Revised Trauma Score [RTS]/Sort Triage, Injury Severity Score [ISS], and Lerner criteria) when applied using trauma patients. Statistical analysis was used to assess the relationship between each triage category and the secondary outcomes.Results:A total of 3,097 cases were included in the study. Using Sort triage as the standard, SALT and META showed much higher sensitivity and specificity in the Immediate category than for Delayed (Immediate sensitivity META 91.5%, SALT 94.9%; specificity 60.8%, 72.7% versus Delayed sensitivity 28.9%, 1.3%; specificity 42.4%, 28.9%). With the Lerner criteria, in the Immediate category, META had higher sensitivity (77.1%, SALT 68.6%) but lower specificity (61.1%) than SALT (71.8%). For the Delayed category, SALT showed higher sensitivity (META 61.4%, SALT 72.2%), but lower specificity (META 75.1%, SALT 67.2%). Both systems showed a positive, though modest, correlation with ISS. For SALT and META, triaged Immediate patients tended to have higher mortality and longer ICU and hospital lengths-of-stay.Conclusion:Both META and SALT triage appear to be more accurate with Immediate category patients, as opposed to Delayed category patients. With both systems, patients triaged as Immediate have higher mortality and longer lengths-of-stay when compared to Delayed patients. Further research can help refine MCI triage systems and improve accuracy.

Background: Hazardous areas are places emitting hazardous materials, terrorist- or war-related, which lead to public health risks in developed and developing countries globally. Hence, prehospital emergency medical personnel who work as frontliners should be trained. Patients and Methods: Data via pretest, posttest, and questionnaire surveys regarding the HART’s knowledge of and confidence in operational skills were collected using the 5-point Likert scale. The cohort included prehospital emergency medical personnel aged > 18 years. The training program comprised lectures, practicals, and examinations and included three subcourses: emergency medicine in the chemical, biological, radiation, and nuclear hazardous area (EM-CBRN) course; Thailand Tactical Emergency Medical Service (TTEMS) course; and cooperation and preparation for disaster (CPD) course. Results: The HART’s mean multiple choice question (MCQ) posttest knowledge score (12.80± 3.11) was significantly higher (p< 0.001) than the mean pretest knowledge score (7.74± 3.71) for the EM-CBRN course. The HART’s mean MCQ posttest knowledge score (24.04± 2.79) was significantly higher (p< 0.001) than the mean pretest knowledge score (14.34± 3.92) for the TTEMS course. Further, the HART’s mean MCQ posttest knowledge score (21.03± 3.49) was significantly higher (p< 0.001) than the mean pretest knowledge score (14.40± 5.08) for the CPD course. The HART’s mean confidence in operational skill score for the EM-CBRN course was significantly higher (p< 0.001) after training (4.45± 0.59) than before training (2.77± 0.90). The HART’s mean confidence in operational skill score for the TTEMS course was significantly higher (p< 0.001) after training (4.55± 0.59) than before training (2.78± 0.98). The HART’s mean confidence in operational skill score for the CPD course was significantly higher (p< 0.001) after training (4.70± 0.41) than before training (3.03± 0.90). Conclusion: The HART training program significantly affected the HART’s knowledge development and confidence in operational skills, particularly the frontline prehospital emergency medical personnel. Therefore, prehospital emergency medical personnel should undergo training, and learning activities must be developed to reinforce capacity and improve knowledge and confidence.

Background/Objectives: Accurate telephone triage of emergency medical cases plays a crucial role in improving outcomes for critically ill patients. Effective triage enables emergency medical dispatchers to provide appropriate pre-arrival instructions and to deploy operational units according to the patient’s severity level. This study aimed to develop and assess the content validity of the Emergency Medical Triage Protocol and Criteria-Based Dispatch Code (EMTP-CBDC) for Thailand. The objective was to ensure the tool’s content accuracy and applicability in prioritizing emergency responses in line with medical urgency, considering global changes and universal standards. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted from 15–30 April 2024. The content validity of the newly developed EMTP-CBDC, comprising 30 symptom groups, was evaluated by five emergency physician experts with at least 1 year of experience in emergency medical oversight. The assessment focused on four aspects: relevance, clarity, simplicity, and ambiguity. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated at both the item level (I-CVI) and the scale level using the average index (S-CVI/Ave). To adjust for chance agreement, the probability of chance agreement (Pc) and the modified kappa coefficient (k*) were calculated for each item. Results: The content validation revealed I-CVI values ranging from 0.80 to 1.00 across all items. The S-CVI/Ave scores were 0.97 for relevance, 0.93 for clarity, 0.98 for simplicity, and 0.94 for ambiguity. These values surpassed the accepted thresholds for content validity. Conclusions: The EMTP-CBDC developed for Thailand demonstrated good content validity across relevance, clarity, simplicity, and ambiguity. Further studies are needed to establish its reliability and field performance before routine implementation.