Georges Daube

Prof. Dr. Georges Daube

University of Liège, Belgium
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
CVClaire Verraes
Claire Verraes
SBSigrid Van Boxstael
Sigrid Van Boxstael
EMEva Van Meervenne
Eva Van Meervenne
ECEls Van Coillie
Els Van Coillie
Patrick ButayePatrick Butaye
Patrick Butaye
LHLieve Herman
Lieve Herman
Antimicrobial resistant zoonotic pathogens present on food constitute a direct risk to public health. Antimicrobial resistance genes in commensal or pathogenic strains form an indirect risk to public health, as they increase the gene pool from which pathogenic bacteria can pick up resistance traits. Food can be contaminated with antimicrobial resistant bacteria and/or antimicrobial resistance genes in several ways. A first way is the presence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on food selected by the use of antibiotics during agricultural production. A second route is the possible presence of resistance genes in bacteria that are intentionally added during the processing of food (starter cultures, probiotics, bioconserving microorganisms and bacteriophages). A last way is through cross-contamination with antimicrobial resistant bacteria during food processing. Raw food products can be consumed without having undergone prior processing or preservation and therefore hold a substantial risk for transfer of antimicrobial resistance to humans, as the eventually present resistant bacteria are not killed. As a consequence, transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes between bacteria after ingestion by humans may occur. Under minimal processing or preservation treatment conditions, sublethally damaged or stressed cells can be maintained in the food, inducing antimicrobial resistance build-up and enhancing the risk of resistance transfer. Food processes that kill bacteria in food products, decrease the risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistance.

1 May 2013 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WCWendie L. Claeys
Wendie L. Claeys
SCSabine Cardoen
Sabine Cardoen
GDGeorges Daube
Georges Daube
JBJan De Block
Jan De Block
KDKoen Dewettinck
Koen Dewettinck
LHLieve Herman
Lieve Herman

18 April 2017 in FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMonika Coton
Monika Coton
APAudrey Pawtowski
Audrey Pawtowski
BTBernard Taminiau
Bernard Taminiau
Gaetan BurgaudGaetan Burgaud
Gaetan Burgaud
FDFranck Deniel
Franck Deniel
Emmanuel COTONEmmanuel COTON
Emmanuel COTON
Kombucha, historically an Asian tea-based fermented drink, has recently become trendy in Western countries. Producers claim it bears health-enhancing properties that may come from the tea or metabolites produced by its microbiome. Despite its long history of production, microbial richness and dynamics have not been fully unraveled, especially at an industrial scale. Moreover, the impact of tea type (green or black) on microbial ecology was not studied. Here, we compared microbial communities from industrial-scale black and green tea fermentations, still traditionally carried out by a microbial biofilm, using culture-dependent and metabarcoding approaches. Dominant bacterial species belonged to Acetobacteraceae and to a lesser extent Lactobacteriaceae, while the main identified yeasts corresponded to Dekkera, Hanseniaspora and Zygosaccharomyces during all fermentations. Species richness decreased over the 8-day fermentation. Among acetic acid bacteria, Gluconacetobacter europaeus, Gluconobacter oxydans, G. saccharivorans and Acetobacter peroxydans emerged as dominant species. The main lactic acid bacteria, Oenococcus oeni, was strongly associated with green tea fermentations. Tea type did not influence yeast community, with Dekkera bruxellensis, D. anomala, Zygosaccharomyces bailii and Hanseniaspora valbyensis as most dominant. This study unraveled a distinctive core microbial community which is essential for fermentation control and could lead to Kombucha quality standardization.

1 September 2015 in Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMC. De Maesschalck
C. De Maesschalck
VEV. Eeckhaut
V. Eeckhaut
LML. Maertens
L. Maertens
LLL. De Lange
L. De Lange
LML. Marchal
L. Marchal
FIFilip Van Immerseel
Filip Van Immerseel
In broiler chickens, feed additives, including prebiotics, are widely used to improve gut health and to stimulate performance. Xylo-oligosaccharides (XOS) are hydrolytic degradation products of arabinoxylans that can be fermented by the gut microbiota. In the current study, we aimed to analyze the prebiotic properties of XOS when added to the broiler diet. Administration of XOS to chickens, in addition to a wheat-rye-based diet, significantly improved the feed conversion ratio. XOS significantly increased villus length in the ileum. It also significantly increased numbers of lactobacilli in the colon and Clostridium cluster XIVa in the ceca. Moreover, the number of gene copies encoding the key bacterial enzyme for butyrate production, butyryl-coenzyme A (butyryl-CoA):acetate CoA transferase, was significantly increased in the ceca of chickens administered XOS. In this group of chickens, at the species level, Lactobacillus crispatus and Anaerostipes butyraticus were significantly increased in abundance in the colon and cecum, respectively. In vitro fermentation of XOS revealed cross-feeding between L. crispatus and A. butyraticus . Lactate, produced by L. crispatus during XOS fermentation, was utilized by the butyrate-producing Anaerostipes species. These data show the beneficial effects of XOS on broiler performance when added to the feed, which potentially can be explained by stimulation of butyrate-producing bacteria through cross-feeding of lactate and subsequent effects of butyrate on gastrointestinal function.

1 February 1995 in Molecular Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ECEmmanuel Cornillot
Emmanuel Cornillot
BSBrigitte Saint‐Joanis
Brigitte Saint‐Joanis
GDGeorges Daube
Georges Daube
SKSei‐Ichi Katayama
Sei‐Ichi Katayama
PGPer Einar Granum
Per Einar Granum
SCStewart T. Cole
Stewart T. Cole

1 January 2015 in Jornal de Pediatria
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Yvan VandenplasYvan Vandenplas
Yvan Vandenplas
GHGeert Huys
Geert Huys
GDGeorges Daube
Georges Daube
Triggered by the growing knowledge on the link between the intestinal microbiome and human health, the interest in probiotics is ever increasing. The authors aimed to review the recent literature on probiotics, from definitions to clinical benefits, with emphasis on children. Relevant literature from searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and recent consensus statements were reviewed. While a balanced microbiome is related to health, an imbalanced microbiome or dysbiosis is related to many health problems both within the gastro-intestinal tract, such as diarrhea and inflammatory bowel disease, and outside the gastro-intestinal tract such as obesity and allergy. In this context, a strict regulation of probiotics with health claims is urgent, because the vast majority of these products are commercialized as food (supplements), claiming health benefits that are often not substantiated with clinically relevant evidence. The major indications of probiotics are in the area of the prevention and treatment of gastro-intestinal related disorders, but more data has become available on extra-intestinal indications. At least two published randomized controlled trials with the commercialized probiotic product in the claimed indication are a minimal condition before a claim can be sustained. Today, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Saccharomyces boulardii are the best-studied strains. Although adverse effects have sporadically been reported, these probiotics can be considered as safe. Although regulation is improving, more stringent definitions are still required. Evidence of clinical benefit is accumulating, although still missing in many areas. Misuse and use of products that have not been validated constitute potential drawbacks.