Laura D'addezio

Dr. Laura D'addezio

CREA Council for Agricultural Research and Economics—Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Rome, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 July 2018 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alessandra DurazzoAlessandra Durazzo
Alessandra Durazzo
Laura D'addezioLaura D'addezio
Laura D'addezio
ECEmanuela Camilli
Emanuela Camilli
RPRaffaela Piccinelli
Raffaela Piccinelli
Aida TurriniAida Turrini
Aida Turrini
SSStefania Sette
Stefania Sette
This work aims at giving an updated picture of the strict interaction between main plant biologically active compounds and botanicals. The main features of the emerging class of dietary supplements, the botanicals, are highlighted. Focus is also on the definition of actual possibilities of study approach and research strategies. Examples of innovative directions are given: assessment of interaction of bioactive compounds, chemometrics and the new goal of biorefineries. Current models of existing databases, such as plant metabolic pathways, food composition, bioactive compounds, dietary supplements, and dietary markers, are described as usable tools for health research. The need for categorization of botanicals as well as for the implementation of specific and dedicated databases emerged, based on both analytical data and collected data taken from literature throughout a harmonized and standardized approach for the evaluation of an adequate dietary intake.

14 September 2015 in British Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FVFrancy B. C. Vennemann
Francy B. C. Vennemann
SISofia Ioannidou
Sofia Ioannidou
LVLiisa M. Valsta
Liisa M. Valsta
CDCéline Dumas
Céline Dumas
MOMarga C. Ocké
Marga C. Ocké
FHFanny Héraud
Fanny Héraud
Choline is an important nutrient for humans. Choline intake of the European population was assessed considering the European Food Safety Authority European Comprehensive Food Consumption Database and the United States Department of Agriculture Nutrient Database. Average choline intake ranges were 151–210 mg/d among toddlers (1 to ≤3 years old), 177–304 mg/d among other children (3 to ≤10 years old), 244–373 mg/d among adolescents (10 to ≤18 years old), 291–468 mg/d among adults (18 to ≤65 years old), 284–450 mg/d among elderly people (65 to ≤75 years old) and 269–444 mg/d among very elderly people (≥75 years old). The intakes were higher among males compared with females, mainly due to larger quantities of food consumed per day. In most of the population groups considered, the average choline intake was below the adequate intake (AI) set by the Institute of Medicine in the USA. The main food groups contributing to choline intake were meat, milk, grain, egg and their derived products, composite dishes and fish. The main limitations of this study are related to the absence of choline composition data of foods consumed by the European population and the subsequent assumption made to assess their intake levels. Given the definition of AI, no conclusion on the adequacy of choline intake can be drawn for most European population groups. Such results improve the knowledge on choline intake in Europe that could be further refined by the collection of choline composition data for foods as consumed in Europe.

4 February 2014 in International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRomana Roccaldo
Romana Roccaldo
Laura CensiLaura Censi
Laura Censi
Laura D'addezioLaura D'addezio
Laura D'addezio
ETElisabetta Toti
Elisabetta Toti
DMDeborah Martone
Deborah Martone
SRSimonetta Rizzo
Simonetta Rizzo
The adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD) of 1740 Italian 8-9-year-olds was evaluated using the KIDMED index and a descriptive analysis of it by socio-demographic and lifestyle factors was performed. Only 5.0% of the children resulted "high" adherers of MD (62.2% "average" and 32.8% "poor"). This scarce adherence was due to a low consumption of fruit, vegetables, legumes, dairy products and a high intake of commercially baked goods for breakfast and sweets. Hindrances to fruit, vegetables and pulses consumption were reported for one-third of the sample. The adherence rates did not differ significantly with BMI and gender. Adherence improved with: having lunch at school; liking lunch at school; breakfast with family; no free access to food; availability of fruit and pulses; liking vegetables; higher maternal education; lower child screen time; population size of place of residence. The results show it is important to improve family food habits and dietary knowledge.


23 August 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMellymertens Mertens
ellymertens Mertens
SBSander Biesbroek
Sander Biesbroek
MDMarcela Dofkova
Marcela Dofkova
Lorenza MisturaLorenza Mistura
Lorenza Mistura
Laura D'addezioLaura D'addezio
Laura D'addezio
PVPieter van ’T Veer
Pieter van ’T Veer
Meat replacers could play a role in achieving more plant-based diets, but their current consumption is limited. The present modelling study aimed to explore the nutritional and greenhouse gas emissions impacts of meat replacers. Using dietary surveys from Denmark, Czech Republic, Italy and France (~6500 adults), we composed alternative diets in which all the meat in the observed diet (in grams) was substituted by similar use meat replacers (with and without fortification). Starting from the observed diets and meat-replacement diets, diets with improved adherence to food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) were modelled using Data Envelopment Analysis. These improved diets were then further optimised for dietary preferences (MaxP, diet similarity index), nutrient quality (MaxH, Nutrient Rich Diet score, NRD15.3) or diet-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) (MaxS, CO2 equivalents). In all optimised modelled diets, the total amount of meat was lower than in the observed diets, i.e., 30% lower in the MaxP, 50% lower in the MaxH, and 75% lower in the MaxS diets. In the MaxP diet, NRD15.3 was ~6% higher, GHGE was ~9% lower, and ~83% of food intake remained similar. In the MaxH diet, NRD15.3 was ~17% higher, GHGE was ~15% lower, and ~66% of food intake remained similar. In the MaxS diet, NRD15.3 was ~9% higher, GHGE was ~33% lower, and ~65% of food intake remained similar. When using fortified meat replacers, for all modelled diets, the diet similarity was on average 2% lower and the GHGE reduction was on average 3% higher as compared with the same scenarios without fortification. This analysis showed that meat replacers, provided their preference is similar to meat, can provide benefits for GHGE, without necessarily compromising nutrient quality.

1 April 2017 in Food and Chemical Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CDCinzia Le Donne
Cinzia Le Donne
Lorenza MisturaLorenza Mistura
Lorenza Mistura
SGSéverine Goscinny
Séverine Goscinny
SJSteven Janvier
Steven Janvier
KCKoenraad Cuypers
Koenraad Cuypers
Aida TurriniAida Turrini
Aida Turrini