Christophe Chiquet

Prof. Dr. Christophe Chiquet

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2008 in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCChristophe Chiquet
Christophe Chiquet
PCPierre-Loic Cornut
Pierre-Loic Cornut
YBYvonne Benito
Yvonne Benito
GTGilles Thuret
Gilles Thuret
MMMax Maurin
Max Maurin
FGFrench Institutional Endophthalmitis Study Group
French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study Group
Purpose. To evaluate eubacterial PCR compared with conventional cultures for detection and identification of bacterial agents in ocular samples from patients with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. methods. Broad-range eubacterial PCR amplification was used, followed by direct DNA sequencing in ocular samples (aqueous humor, vitreous samples from tap or vitrectomy) from 100 consecutive patients presenting with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. Bacterial cultures were performed on the same ocular samples by using traditional methods (brain-heart infusion broth). results. At the time of admission, the detection rate was not significantly different between cultures and PCR (38.2% for cultures versus 34.6% for PCR in aqueous humor samples; 54% versus 57% in vitreous from a vitreous tap). In contrast, in the vitreous obtained from vitrectomy, after intravitreous injection of antibiotics, PCR detected bacteria in 70% of the cases, compared with 9% in cultures. By combining PCR and cultures, bacterial identification was obtained in 47% of aqueous humor samples at admission, in 68% of vitreous samples from a vitreous tap at admission, and in 72% of vitreous samples from pars plana vitrectomy. Gram-positive bacteria predominated (94.3%). The concordance between cultures and PCR was 100%. The contamination rate was 2%. conclusions. Cultures and eubacterial PCR are complementary techniques for bacterial identification in eyes with acute postcataract endophthalmitis. PCR technique was needed for identification of the involved microbial pathogen in 25% of all the cases. Eubacterial PCR is more effective than cultures in detecting bacteria in vitreous samples from patients with previous intravitreous administration of antibiotics.

12 August 2010 in Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CPCindy Puech
Cindy Puech
SGStéphane Gennai
Stéphane Gennai
PPPatricia Pavese
Patricia Pavese
IPIsabelle Pelloux
Isabelle Pelloux
MMMax Maurin
Max Maurin
CCChristophe Chiquet
Christophe Chiquet

1 September 2013 in JAMA Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAurélie Combey de Lambert
Aurélie Combey de Lambert
NCNelly Campolmi
Nelly Campolmi
PCPierre-Loic Cornut
Pierre-Loic Cornut
FAFlorent Aptel
Florent Aptel
CCCatherine Creuzot-Garcher
Catherine Creuzot-Garcher
CCChristophe Chiquet
Christophe Chiquet
Postoperative endophthalmitis in patients undergoing cataract surgery is a rare (approximately 0.08% of cataract procedures)1,2 but serious complication that can lead to anatomical and/or functional loss of the eye. Significant advances have been achieved in the field of antibiotic prophylaxis (intracameral injection of cefuroxime sodium, 10 mg/mL)3-5 and microbiological diagnosis.6-9 The identification of baseline prognostic factors at the time of modern clear corneal cataract surgery remains an important step to identify patients who need aggressive therapy as early as possible. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based techniques now provide accurate and rapid identification of the microorganisms directly involved in intraocular samples. These methods will make rapid adaptation of the therapeutic strategy to clinical and microbiological factors possible and give more objective information to the patient.

1 April 2018 in Sleep Medicine Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMarielle Mentek
Marielle Mentek
FAFlorent Aptel
Florent Aptel
DGDiane Godin-Ribuot
Diane Godin-Ribuot
RTRenaud Tamisier
Renaud Tamisier
JPJean-Louis Pepin
Jean-Louis Pepin
CCChristophe Chiquet
Christophe Chiquet

7 February 2012 in Acta Ophthalmologica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPierre‐Loïc Cornut
Pierre‐Loïc Cornut
EYEl Bichara Youssef
El Bichara Youssef
ABAlain Bron
Alain Bron
GTGilles Thuret
Gilles Thuret
PGPhilippe Gain
Philippe Gain
FGfor the French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study (FRIENDS) Group
for the French Institutional Endophthalmitis Study (FRIENDS) Group
: Purpose:  Study the clinical and microbiological characteristics and the prognostic factors of post‐traumatic endophthalmitis.Methods:  Seventeen eyes were included between 2004 and 2010, with clinical and microbiological data collected prospectively. Conventional cultures and panbacterial PCR were performed on aqueous and vitreous samples.Results:  Clinical signs of endophthalmitis were observed soon after trauma (1.5 ± 2.5 days). Laceration with an intraocular foreign body (IOFB) was noted in 53% of the patients. At admission, all patients had aqueous humour (71%) and/or vitreous (53%) samples. Fifteen patients (88%) underwent a pars plana vitrectomy. Bacteria were identified in 77% of the cases: Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 5), Streptococcus (n = 4), Bacillus (n = 2), Pseudomonas stuzeri (n = 1), and Streptococcus salivarius and Gemella haemolysans (multibacterial infection, n = 1). Progression toward phthisis was observed in 35% of the cases; 41% of the patients recuperated visual acuity (VA) ≥20/40. A good final visual prognosis (≥20/40) was significantly associated with initial VA better than light perception (0% versus 70%, p = 0.01) and absence of pupillary fibrin membrane (80% versus 20%, p = 0.05). There was no correlation between visual prognosis and age, the type of laceration (corneal or scleral) or presence of an IOFB. We found a statistical trend toward an association between bacterial virulence and poor final VA.Conclusion:  This series showed that better final VA outcomes were associated with initial VA better than light perception, S. epidermidis or culture‐negative cases and absence of retinal detachment during the clinical course.

1 April 2007 in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCChristophe Chiquet
Christophe Chiquet
GLGerard Lina
Gerard Lina
YBYvonne Benito
Yvonne Benito
PCPierre-Loïc Cornut
Pierre-Loïc Cornut
JEJérôme Etienne
Jérôme Etienne
FVFrançois Vandenesch
François Vandenesch
To identify bacterial agents in the aqueous humor of patients with postoperative endophthalmitis using eubacterial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and conventional culture. University Hospital of Lyon E. Herriot, Lyon, France. Broad-range eubacterial PCR amplification followed by direct sequencing was used to identify microbial pathogens in ocular samples from 30 patients with acute or delayed-onset endophthalmitis, mainly after cataract surgery. Ocular samples included aqueous humor collected before the first intravitreal injection of antibiotics and vitreous samples collected at the time of the therapeutic pars plana vitrectomy. Cultures were positive in 32% of cases and PCR in 61% of cases with aqueous humor samples. When associated, culture and PCR of aqueous humor samples allowed for a microbiological diagnosis in 71% of cases. Microorganisms cultured by conventional techniques matched those identified by PCR. When applied on vitreous pretreated with intravitreal antibiotics, PCR increased the identification rate from 18% to 62%. Polymerase chain reaction assay of initial aqueous humor samples contributed to the diagnosis of endophthalmitis in 30% of cases. Previous use of intravitreal antibiotics did not seem to affect the ability to PCR-amplify DNA in the short term. Polymerase chain reaction-based technology was a useful adjunct to conventional culture because when used with aqueous humor samples only, the association of both techniques allowed for a microbiological diagnosis in 71% of cases of postoperative acute and delayed-onset endophthalmitis.