In countries where the National Health Service provides universal health coverage, socioeconomic position should not influence the quality of health care. We examined whether socioeconomic position plays a role in short-term mortality and waiting time for surgery after hip fracture. Retrospective cohort study. From the Hospital Information System database, we selected all patients, aged at least 65 years and admitted to acute care hospitals in Rome for a hip fracture between 1 January 2006 and 30 November 2007. The socioeconomic position of each individual was obtained using a city-specific index of socioeconomic variables based on the individual's census tract of residence. Three different outcomes were defined: waiting times for surgery, mortality within 30 days and intervention within 48 h of hospital arrival for hip fracture. We used a logistic regression to estimate 30-day mortality and a Cox proportional hazard model to calculate hazard ratios of intervention within 48 h. Median waiting times were estimated by adjusted Kaplan–Meyer curves. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender and coexisting medical conditions. Low socioeconomic level was significantly associated with higher risk of mortality [adjusted relative risk (RR) = 1.51; P < 0.05] and lower risk of early intervention (adjusted RR = 0.32; P < 0.001). Socioeconomic level had also an effect on waiting times within 30 days. Individuals living in disadvantaged census tracts had poorer prognoses and were less likely than more affluent people to be treated according to clinical guidelines despite universal healthcare coverage.

Background From 2006 to 2007 Lazio and Tuscany, two Italian regions, released data about hospital performance and implemented strategic programmes aimed at improving the quality of hospital care. Furthermore, different pay-for-performance systems were introduced: the hospital's performance determined the DRG (Diagnosis-Related Group) reimbursement rate for Lazio providers while in Tuscany the chief executive officer's compensation was linked to the hospital's performance. The authors evaluated the impact of the Lazio and Tuscany programmes on quality of healthcare for orthopaedic patients compared with other Italian regions. Methods The proportion of older patients admitted with hip fractures who had surgery within 48 h and the median waiting time for surgical treatment of fractures of the tibia or fibula were estimated separately for Lazio, Tuscany and other Italian regions for two periods: 2006–2007 and 2008–2009. Risk-adjusted proportions were obtained using the direct standardisation method and a multivariate logistic regression was performed taking into account age, gender and comorbidity status. Results The proportion of hip operations performed within 48 h was increased by 34% for Lazio (p<0.001) and 46% for Tuscany (p<0.001) and reduced by 3% in other Italian regions (p<0.001). To assess for possible adverse consequences, such as increased waiting times for other orthopaedic procedures, the authors monitored time to surgery for tibia or fibula fractures. There were no significant differences in the median time to surgery for tibia or fibula fractures between the two periods. Conclusions The Lazio and Tuscany programmes appeared to have a positive impact on quality of care for older patients admitted with hip fracture without having a negative impact on other orthopaedic interventions. The results highlight the need for continuous quality improvement by repeating the evaluation process and by combining the performance system with a management strategy.

P.Re.Val.E. is the most comprehensive comparative evaluation program of healthcare outcomes in Lazio, an Italian region, and the first Italian study to make health provider performance data available to the public.