Stéphanie Forté

Dr. Stéphanie Forté

CHUM Research Center
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 February 2007 in Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAlberto Ramos
Alberto Ramos
WHWai Chi Ho
Wai Chi Ho
Stéphanie FortéStéphanie Forté
Stéphanie Forté
KDKathleen Dickson
Kathleen Dickson
JBJacqueline Boutilier
Jacqueline Boutilier
PBPhilip A. Barker
Philip A. Barker
Injury-induced expression of the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) in the CNS facilitates neuronal apoptosis and prevents neuronal regrowth, but the mechanisms regulating p75NTR expression are poorly characterized. In this study, we showed that hypo-osmolarity induces p75NTR expression in primary neurons, and, using a comparative genomics approach, we identified conserved elements in the 25 kb upstream sequences of the rat, mouse, and human p75NTR genes. We found that only one of these, a proximal region rich in Sp1 sites, responds to changes in hypo-osmolarity. We then showed that Sp1 DNA binding activity is increased in cells exposed to hypo-osmolarity, established that hypo-osmolarity enhanced Sp1 binding to the endogenous p75NTR promoter, and showed that Sp1 is required for p75NTR expression induced by hypo-osmolarity. We examined how Sp1 is regulated to effect these changes and established that Sp1 turnover is strongly inhibited by hypo-osmolarity. We propose that stress-induced Sp1 accumulation that results from reductions in Sp1 turnover rate contributes to injury-induced gene expression.

8 December 2023 in eClinicalMedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IMIsabella Michelon
Isabella Michelon
MVMaysa Vilbert
Maysa Vilbert
IPIsabella Silveira Pinheiro
Isabella Silveira Pinheiro
ICIsabela Lino Costa
Isabela Lino Costa
CLCecilia Fernandes Lorea
Cecilia Fernandes Lorea
Stéphanie FortéStéphanie Forté
Stéphanie Forté
Clinical manifestations and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) and sickle cell trait (SCT) are not well understood yet. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess COVID-19 outcomes in individuals with SCD or SCT compared to individuals without sickle cell disease or trait. An electronic search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed on August 3, 2023. Two authors (IFM and ISP) independently screened (IFM and ISP) and extracted data (IFM and ILC) from included studies. Main exclusion criterion was the absence of the non-SCD/SCT group. Exposure effects for binary endpoints were compared using pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). I2 statistics was used to assess the heterogeneity and DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models were applied for all analyses to minimize the impact of differences in methods and outcomes definitions between studies. The overall quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. Review Manager 5.4 and R software (v4.2.2) were used for statistical analyses. Registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022366015. Overall, 22 studies were included, with a total of 1892 individuals with SCD, 8677 individuals with SCT, and 1,653,369 individuals without SCD/SCT. No difference in all-cause mortality was seen between SCD/SCT and non-SCD/SCT (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.78–1.77; p = 0.429; I2 = 82%). When considering only studies adjusted for confounders (8 studies), patients with SCD/SCT were shown to be at increased risk of death (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.30–2.66; p = 0.0007; I2 = 34%). No significant difference was seen between individuals with SCD and SCT (p = 0.863). The adjusted for confounders analysis for hospitalisation revealed higher rates for the SCD (OR 5.44; 95% CI 1.55–19.13; p = 0.008; I2 = 97%) and the SCT groups (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.10–1.55; p = 0.002; I2 = 0) compared to the non-SCD/SCT population. Moreover, it was significantly higher for the SCD group (test for subgroup difference; p = 0.028). Our findings suggest that patients with SCD or SCT may present with a higher mortality and hospitalisation rates due to COVID-19 infection. None.

3 May 2021 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Stéphanie FortéStéphanie Forté
Stéphanie Forté
FBFlorence Blais
Florence Blais
Mathias CastonguayMathias Castonguay
Mathias Castonguay
NFNafanta Fadiga
Nafanta Fadiga
MFMireille Fortier-St-Pierre
Mireille Fortier-St-Pierre
KKKevin H.M. Kuo
Kevin H.M. Kuo
Black individuals in the United States are at an increased risk for dementia.1,2 Adults with sickle cell disease (SCD), in particular, disproportionally experience cognitive dysfunction.3 Sickle cell disease is a genetic condition that occurs in about 1 in every 365 births in the Black or African American population.4 Substitution of glutamine by valine in position 6 of the β-globin is responsible for the irreversible sickling of red blood cells, hemolysis, and vaso-occlusion under prolonged deoxygenated conditions. This sickling leads to anemia, pain crises, and systemic vasculopathy that can culminate in stroke, silent cerebral infarcts, reduced cerebral vascular reserve, and cognitive dysfunction.5,6 Precise estimates on the prevalence of dementia and mild neurocognitive disorder (NCD) in adults with SCD are lacking, but they could be as high as 33%.3 In comparison, 564 000 persons (<2% of the population) in Canada were estimated to live with dementia in 2016.7 The cognitive domains associated with SCD are perceptual reasoning, verbal reasoning, executive function, working memory, attention, and processing speed.8 These deficits can have implications for quality of life, social functioning, school performance, and employment.9

23 February 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stéphanie FortéStéphanie Forté
Stéphanie Forté
GLGonzalo De Luna
Gonzalo De Luna
JAJameel Abdulrehman
Jameel Abdulrehman
NFNafanta Fadiga
Nafanta Fadiga
OPOlivia Pestrin
Olivia Pestrin
KKKevin H.M. Kuo
Kevin H.M. Kuo
Sickle cell disease (SCD) induces a chronic prothrombotic state. Central venous access devices (CVADs) are commonly used for chronic transfusions and iron chelation in this population. CVADs are an additional venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factor. The role of thromboprophylaxis in this setting is uncertain. The objectives are: (1) to determine whether thromboprophylaxis reduces VTE risk in SCD patients with CVAD and (2) to explore characteristics associated with VTE risk. We identified adults with SCD and CVAD intended for chronic use (≥3 months) at two comprehensive SCD centers. Thromboprophylaxis presence; type; intensity; and patient-, catheter-, and treatment-related VTE risk factors were recorded. Among 949 patients, 49 had a CVAD (25 without and 24 with VTE prophylaxis). Thromboprophylaxis type and intensity varied widely. Patients without thromboprophylaxis had higher VTE rates (rate ratio (RR) = 4.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.2–12.6), p = 0.02). Hydroxyurea was associated with lower VTE rates (RR = 20.5 (6.4–65.3), p < 0.001). PICC lines and Vortex and Xcela Power implantable devices were associated with higher rates compared with Port-a-Cath (RR = 5.8 (1.3–25.9), p = 0.02, and RR = 58.2 (15.0–225.0), p < 0.001, respectively). Thromboprophylaxis, hydroxyurea, and CVAD subtype were independently associated with VTE. The potentially protective role of thromboprophylaxis and hydroxyurea for VTE prevention in patients with SCD and CVAD merits further exploration.

17 February 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMaryline COUETTE
Maryline COUETTE
Stéphanie FortéStéphanie Forté
Stéphanie Forté
DDDamien Oudin Doglioni
Damien Oudin Doglioni
ADArmand Mekontso Dessap
Armand Mekontso Dessap
DCDavid Calvet
David Calvet
PBPablo Bartolucci
Pablo Bartolucci
This study sought to link neurocognitive profiles in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients with clinical characteristics. We conducted a prospective cohort study of adults with SCD who underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessment at the UMGGR clinic at Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil (France). A cluster analysis was performed based on neuropsychological testing scores. The association between clusters and clinical profiles was assessed. Between 2017 and 2021, 79 patients with a mean age of 36 [range 19–65] years were included. On principal component analysis, a 5-factor model presented the best fit (Bartlett’s sphericity test [χ2 (171) = 1345; p < 0.001]), explaining 72% of the variance. The factors represent distinct cognitive domains and anatomical regions. On hierarchical classification, three clusters emerged. Cluster 1 (n = 24) presented deficits in all five factors compared to Cluster 3 (n = 33). Cluster 2 (n = 22) had deficits in all factors, but to a lesser extent than Cluster 1. MoCA scores mirrored the severity of these cognitive deficits. Age, genotype and stroke prevalence did not differ significantly between clusters. However, the time of first stroke occurrence differed significantly between Cluster 1 and 2–3: 78% of strokes occurred during childhood, whereas 80% and 83% occurred during adulthood in Clusters 2 and 3, respectively. Educational attainment was also reduced in Cluster 1. SCD patients with childhood stroke seem to be at increased risk of a global cognitive deficit profile. In addition to existing methods of primary and secondary stroke prevention, early neurorehabilitation should be prioritized in order to reduce the long-term cognitive morbidity of SCD.

12 December 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mathias CastonguayMathias Castonguay
Mathias Castonguay
NDNawar Dakhallah
Nawar Dakhallah
Justin DesrochesJustin Desroches
Justin Desroches
MCMarie-Laure Colaiacovo
Marie-Laure Colaiacovo
CJCamille Jimenez-Cortes
Camille Jimenez-Cortes
Stéphanie FortéStéphanie Forté
Stéphanie Forté
Background: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are considered at higher risk of severe COVID-19 infection. However, morbidity and mortality rates are variable among countries. To date, there are no published reports that document outcomes of SCD patients with COVID-19 in Canada. Methods: A web-based registry was implemented in June 2020 capturing outcomes of SCD patients with COVID-19 from March 2020 to April 2022 and comparing them to the general population of Quebec, Canada. Results: After 24 months of the pandemic, 185 SCD patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in the registry. Overall, the population was young (median age 12 years old) and had few comorbidities. No deaths were reported. Risk of hospitalization and admission to intensive care unit (ICU) because of COVID-19 was higher in patients with SCD than in the general population (relative risks (RR) 5.15 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.84–6.91), p ˂ 0.001 and 4.56 (95% CI 2.09–9.93) p ˂ 0.001). A history of arterial hypertension or acute chest syndrome in the past 12 months was associated with a higher risk of severe disease (RR = 3.06 (95% CI 1.85–5.06) p = 0.008 and 2.27 (95% CI 1.35–3.83) p = 0.01). Hospitalized patients had lower hemoglobin F than non-hospitalized patients (12% vs. 17%, p = 0.02). For those who had access to vaccination at the time of infection, 25 out of 26 patients were adequately vaccinated and had mild disease. Conclusions: The SCD population is at higher risk of severe disease than the general population. However, we report favorable outcomes as no deaths occurred. Registries will continue to be critical to document the impact of novel COVID-19 specific therapy and vaccines for the SCD population.