Francesco Sala

Dr. Francesco Sala


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2006 in Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FSFrancesco Sala
Francesco Sala
GPGiorgio Palandri
Giorgio Palandri
EBElisabetta Basso
Elisabetta Basso
Paola LanteriPaola Lanteri
Paola Lanteri
VDVedran Deletis
Vedran Deletis
ABAlbino Bricolo
Albino Bricolo
The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (INM) during intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery remains debated. This historical control study tests the hypothesis that INM monitoring improves neurological outcome. In 50 patients operated on after September 2000, we monitored somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranially elicited epidural (D-wave) and muscle motor evoked potentials (INM group). The historical control group consisted of 50 patients selected from among 301 patients who underwent intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery, previously operated on by the same team without INM. Matching by preoperative neurological status (McCormick scale), histological findings, tumor location, and extent of removal were blind to outcome. A more than 50% somatosensory evoked potential amplitude decrement influenced only myelotomy. Muscle motor evoked potential disappearance modified surgery, but more than 50% D-wave amplitude decrement was the major indication to stop surgery. The postoperative to preoperative McCormick grade variation at discharge and at a follow-up of at least 3 months was compared between the two groups (Student's t tests). Follow-up McCormick grade variation in the INM group (mean, +0.28) was significantly better (P = 0.0016) than that of the historical control group (mean, -0.16). At discharge, there was a trend (P = 0.1224) toward better McCormick grade variation in the INM group (mean, -0.26) than in the historical control group (mean, -0.5). The applied motor evoked potential methods seem to improve long-term motor outcome significantly. Early motor outcome is similar because of transient motor deficits in the INM group, which can be predicted at the end of surgery by the neurophysiological profile of patients.


1 February 2010 in Neurosurgical Focus
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAndrea Szelényi
Andrea Szelényi
LBLorenzo Bello
Lorenzo Bello
HDHugues Duffau
Hugues Duffau
EFEnrica Fava
Enrica Fava
GFGuenther C. Feigl
Guenther C. Feigl
FSFrancesco Sala
Francesco Sala
There is increasing evidence that the extent of tumor removal in low-grade glioma surgery is related to patient survival time. Thus, the goal of resecting the largest amount of tumor possible without leading to permanent neurological sequelae is a challenge for the neurosurgeon. Electrical stimulation of the brain to detect cortical and axonal areas involved in motor, language, and cognitive function and located within the tumor or along its boundaries has become an essential tool in combination with awake craniotomy. Based on a literature review, discussions within the European Low-Grade Glioma Group, and illustrative clinical experience, the authors of this paper provide an overview for neurosurgeons, neurophysiologists, linguists, and anesthesiologists as well as those new to the field about the stimulation techniques currently being used for mapping sensorimotor, language, and cognitive function in awake surgery for low-grade glioma. The paper is intended to help the understanding of these techniques and facilitate a comparison of results between users.

26 July 2007 in European Spine Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FSFrancesco Sala
Francesco Sala
ABAlbino Bricolo
Albino Bricolo
FFFranco Faccioli
Franco Faccioli
Paola LanteriPaola Lanteri
Paola Lanteri
MGMassimo Gerosa
Massimo Gerosa

13 June 2002 in Child's Nervous System
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FSFrancesco Sala
Francesco Sala
MKMatevž J. Kržan
Matevž J. Kržan
VDVedran Deletis
Vedran Deletis

1 January 2019 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DMD.B. MacDonald
D.B. MacDonald
CDC. Dong
C. Dong
RQR. Quatrale
R. Quatrale
FSFrancesco Sala
Francesco Sala
SSS. Skinner
S. Skinner
ASA. Szelényi
A. Szelényi
Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) provide dorsal somatosensory system functional and localizing information, and complement motor evoked potentials. Correct application and interpretation require in-depth knowledge of relevant anatomy, electrophysiology, and techniques. It is advisable to facilitate cortical SEPs with total intravenous propofol-opioid or similarly favorable anesthesia. Moreover, SEP optimization is recommended to enhance surgical feedback speed and accuracy by maximizing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); it consists of selecting highest-SNR peripheral and cortical derivations while omitting low-SNR channels. Confounding factors causing non-surgical SEP reduction should be excluded before issuing a warning. It is advisable to facilitate their identification with peripheral SEP controls and cortical SEP systemic controls whenever possible. Warning criteria should adjust for baseline drift and reproducibility. The recommended adaptive warning criterion is visually obvious amplitude reduction from recent pre-change values and clearly exceeding trial-to-trial variability, particularly when abrupt and focal. Acquisition and interpretation should be done by qualified technical and professional level personnel. Indications for SEP monitoring include intracranial, posterior fossa, and spinal neurosurgery, as well as orthopedic spine, cerebrovascular, and descending aortic surgery. Indications for SEP mapping include sensorimotor cortex and dorsal column midline identification. Future advances could modify current recommendations.