Owing to its antibacterial properties, ceftaroline could be attractive for prevention or treatment of bacterial post-neurosurgical meningitis/ventriculitis. However, few data are available concerning its meningeal concentrations. To investigate ceftaroline CSF pharmacokinetics in ICU patients with an external ventricular drain (EVD). Patients received a single 600 mg dose of ceftaroline as a 1 h intravenous infusion. Blood and CSF samples were collected before and 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h after the end of the infusion. Concentrations were assayed in plasma and CSF by LC-MS/MS. A two-step compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted. Ceftaroline plasma data were first analysed, and thereafter plasma parameters estimated and corrected for protein binding of 20% were fixed to fit unbound CSF concentrations. In the final model, parameters for both plasma and CSF data were simultaneously estimated. Nine patients with an EVD were included. The Cmax was 18.29 ± 3.33 mg/L in plasma (total concentrations) and at 0.22 ± 0.17 mg/L in CSF (unbound concentration). The model-estimated CSF input/CSF output clearance ratio was 9.4%, attesting to extensive efflux transport at the blood-CSF barrier. Ceftaroline CSF concentrations are too low to ensure prophylactic protection against most pathogens with MICs between 1 and 2 mg/L, owing to its limited central distribution.

Checkerboard experiments followed by fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index determinations are commonly used to assess in vitro pharmacodynamic interactions between combined antibiotics, but FIC index cannot be determined in case of antibiotic/non-active compound combinations. The aim of this study was to use a simple modelling approach to quantify the in vitro activity of aztreonam-avibactam, a new β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination. MIC checkerboard experiments were performed with 12 Enterobacteriaceae with diverse β-lactamases profiles. Aztreonam MICs in the absence and presence of avibactam at different concentrations (ranging from 0.0625 to 4 mg/L) were determined. Aztreonam MIC versus avibactam concentrations were fitted by an inhibitory Emax model with a baseline effect parameter. A concentration-dependent relationship was observed with a steep initial reduction of aztreonam MIC at low avibactam concentrations and reaching a maximum at higher avibactam concentrations that was adequately fitted by the model. Maximum avibactam effect was characterized by the ratio of aztreonam MICs in the absence of avibactam (MIC0) and when avibactam concentration tends toward infinity (MIC∞), and this ratio ranged between 90 and 10 068 depending on the strain. Avibactam potency was characterized by avibactam concentrations corresponding to 50% of the maximum effect (IC50 values between 0.00022 and 0.053 mg/L). An inhibitory Emax model with a baseline effect could quantify maximum avibactam effect and potency among various strains. This simple modelling approach can be used to compare the activity of other combinations of antibiotics with non-antibiotic drugs when FIC index is inappropriate.

Ceftaroline could be suitable to treat early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) because of its antibacterial spectrum. However, augmented renal clearance (ARC) is frequent in ICU patients and may affect ceftaroline pharmacokinetics and efficacy. The objective of the study was to explore the impact of ARC on ceftaroline pharmacokinetics and evaluate whether the currently recommended dosing regimen (600 mg every 12 h) is appropriate to treat VAP in ICU patients. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using pharmacokinetic data from 18 patients with measured creatinine clearance (CL_CR) ranging between 83 and 309 mL/min. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to determine the PTA and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against Streptococcus pneumoniae and MRSA for five dosing regimens. Study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03025841). Ceftaroline clearance increased non-linearly with CL_CR, with lower concentrations and lower probability of reaching pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets when CL_CR increases. For the currently recommended dosing regimen, the probability of having unbound ceftaroline concentrations above the MIC over the entire dose range is greater than 90% for MICs below 0.125 mg/L. Considering the distribution of MICs, this regimen would not be effective against MRSA infections (CFR between 21% and 67% depending on CL_CR), but would be effective against S. pneumoniae infections (CFR >86%). The recommended dosing regimen of ceftaroline seems sufficient for covering S. pneumoniae in ICU patients with ARC, but not for MRSA. Among the dosing regimens tested it appears that a constant infusion (50 mg/h) after a loading dose of 600 mg could be more appropriate for MRSA infections.

The purpose of this study was to investigate aztreonam (ATM) and avibactam (AVI) distribution in intraperitoneal fluid and muscle interstitial fluid by microdialysis in rats, with or without peritonitis, and to compare the unbound concentrations in tissue with the unbound concentrations in blood. Microdialysis probes were inserted into the jugular veins, hind leg muscles, and peritoneal cavities of control rats ( n = 5) and rats with intra-abdominal sepsis ( n = 9) induced by cecal ligation and punctures.

Aztreonam‐avibactam (ATM‐AVI) is a promising combination to treat serious infections caused by multidrug‐resistant (MDR) pathogens. Three distinct mechanisms of action have been previously characterized for AVI: inhibition of ATM degradation by β‐lactamases, proper bactericidal effect, and enhancement of ATM bactericidal activity. The aim of this study was to quantify the individual contribution of each of the three AVI effects. In vitro static time‐kill studies were performed on four MDR Enterobacteriaceae with different β‐lactamase profiles. β‐Lactamase activity was characterized by measuring ATM concentrations over 27 hours. Data were analyzed by a semimechanistic pharmacodynamics modeling approach. Surprisingly, even though AVI prevented ATM degradation, the combined bactericidal activity was mostly explained by the enhancement of ATM effect within clinical range of ATM (5–125 mg/L) and AVI concentrations (0.9–22.5 mg/L). Therefore, when selecting a β‐lactamase inhibitor for combination with a β‐lactam, its capability to enhance the β‐lactam activity should be considered in addition to the spectrum of β‐lactamases inhibited.