We previously reported that intramyocardial injection of bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing Akt (Akt‐MSCs) inhibits ventricular remodeling and restores cardiac function measured 2 wk after myocardial infarction. Here, we report that the functional improvement occurs in < 72 h. This early remarkable effect cannot be readily attributed to myocardial regeneration from the donor cells. Thus, we hypothesized that paracrine actions exerted by the cells through the release of soluble factors might be important mechanisms of tissue repair and functional improvement after injection of the Akt‐MSCs. Indeed, in the current study we demonstrate that conditioned medium from hypoxic Akt‐MSCs markedly inhibits hypoxia‐induced apoptosis and triggers vigorous spontaneous contraction of adult rat cardiomyocytes in vitro . When injected into infarcted hearts, the Akt‐MSC conditioned medium significantly limits infarct size and improves ventricular function relative to controls. Sup‐port to the paracrine hypothesis is provided by data showing that several genes, coding for factors (VEGF, FGF‐2, HGF, IGF‐I, and TB4) that are potential mediators of the effects exerted by the Akt‐MSC conditioned medium, are significantly up‐regulated in the Akt‐MSCs, particularly in response to hypoxia. Taken together, our data support Akt‐MSC‐mediated para‐crine mechanisms of myocardial protection and functional improvement.‐Gnecchi, M., He, H., Noiseux, N., Liang, O. D., Zhang, L., Morello, F., Mu, H., Melo, L. G., Pratt, R. E., Ingwall, J. S., Dzau, V. J. Evidence supporting paracrine hypothesis for Akt‐modified mes‐enchymal stem cell‐mediated cardiac protection and functional improvement. FASEB J. 20, 661–669 (2006)

Primary aldosteronism is a specifically treatable and potentially curable form of secondary hypertension. The aldosterone/plasma renin activity ratio (ARR) is routinely used as a screening test. Antihypertensive therapy can interfere with the interpretation of this parameter, but a correct washout period can be potentially harmful. We have investigated the effects of therapy with atenolol, amlodipine, doxazosin, fosinopril, and irbesartan on the ARR in a group of 230 patients with suspected primary aldosteronism. The percent change from control of ARR in patients taking amlodipine was −17%±32; atenolol, 62%±82; doxazosin, −5%±26; fosinopril, −30%±24; and irbesartan, −43%±27. The ARR change induced by atenolol was significantly higher compared with that induced by all other drugs ( P <0.0001), and the ARR change induced by irbesartan was significantly lower than that induced by doxazosin ( P <0.0001). One of 55 patients from the group taking amlodipine (1.8%) and 4/17 of the patients taking irbesartan (23.5%) gave a false-negative ARR (<50). None of the patients of the groups taking fosinopril, doxazosin, and atenolol displayed a false-negative ARR. Doxazosin and fosinopril can be used in hypertensive patients who need to undergo aldosterone and PRA measurement for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism; amlodipine gave a very small percentage of false-negative diagnoses. β-Blockers also do not interfere with the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism, but they can be responsible for an increased rate of false-positive ARRs. The high rate of false-negative diagnoses in patients undergoing irbesartan treatment requires confirmation in a higher number of patients.

Background—Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) are rare and severe cardiovascular emergencies with unspecific symptoms. For AAS, both misdiagnosis and over-testing are key concerns, and standardized diagnostic strategies may help physicians to balance these risks. D-dimer (DD) is highly sensitive for AAS, but is inadequate as a standalone test. Integration of pre-test probability assessment (PPA) with D-dimer (DD) testing is feasible, but the safety and efficiency of such diagnostic strategy are currently unknown. Methods—In a multicenter prospective observational study involving 6 hospitals in 4 countries from 2014 to 2016, consecutive outpatients were eligible if they had ≥1 of the following: chest/abdominal/back pain, syncope, perfusion deficit, and if AAS was in differential diagnosis. The tool for PPA was the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS, 0 to 3), per current guidelines. DD was considered negative (DD-) if 1. 241 (13%) patients had AAS: 125 had type A aortic dissection, 53 had type B aortic dissection, 35 had intramural aortic hematoma, 18 had aortic rupture, and 10 had penetrating aortic ulcer. A positive DD test result had an overall sensitivity of 96.7% (95% CI 93.6-98.6%) and a specificity of 64% (95% CI 61.6-66.4%) for diagnosis of AAS; 8 patients with AAS had DD-. Within 294 patients with ADD-RS=0/DD-, 1 case of AAS was observed. This yielded a failure rate of 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-1.9%) and efficiency of 15.9% (95% CI 14.3-17.6%) for the ADD-RS=0/DD- strategy. Within 924 patients with ADD-RS≤1/DD-, 3 cases of AAS were observed. This yielded a failure rate of 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-1%) and efficiency of 49.9% (95% CI 47.7-52.2%) for the ADD-RS≤1/DD- strategy. Conclusions—Integration of ADD-RS (both =0 or ≤1) with DD may be considered to standardize diagnostic rule-out of AAS. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02086136

Introduction: Sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock are common conditions with high mortality. Their early diagnosis in the Emergency Department (ED) is one of the keys to improving survival. Procalcitonin (PCT) has been used as a biomarker in septic patients but has limited specificity and can be elevated in other scenarios of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Soluble CD14 (sCD14) or presepsin is the free fragment of a glycoprotein expressed on monocytes and macrophages. Preliminary reports suggest that levels of presepsin are significantly higher in septic patients than in healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin compared to PCT in people presenting at the ED with SIRS and suspected sepsis or septic shock. Methods: This study was conducted in two major hospitals in Turin, Italy. One hundred six patients presenting to the EDs with suspected sepsis or septic shock were included, and another eighty-three patients affected by SIRS, but with no clinical evidence of infection, were recruited as controls. Blood samples were collected at first medical evaluation and for some patients after 24 and 72 h. The samples were analyzed using the PATHFAST Presepsin assay for sCD14, and commercial kits were used for other determinations (for example, PCT). Definitive diagnosis and survival rates were obtained afterward by analysis of digital medical records. Results: Elevated concentrations of presepsin at presentation were observed in septic patients compared to control patients. The same trend was observed for mean values of PCT. Higher values of presepsin were observed in septic patients at presentation (time 0). The diagnostic accuracy of PCT was generally higher, and areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.875 for PCT and 0.701 for presepsin. Mean presepsin values were significantly higher in nonsurvivor septic patients (60-day mortality) than in survivors. No significant correlation was noted between PCT and survival. Conclusions: In our experience, presepsin was useful in the early diagnosis of infection in a complex population of patients with SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock who presented to the ED. Presepsin showed a significant prognostic value, and initial values were significantly correlated with in-hospital mortality of patients affected by sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock.