Ella Terblanche

Mrs. Ella Terblanche

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 May 2018 in Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ETElla Terblanche
Ella Terblanche

9 May 2022 in Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PTPaul Twose
Paul Twose
ETElla Terblanche
Ella Terblanche
UJUna Jones
Una Jones
JBJames Bruce
James Bruce
PFPenelope Firshman
Penelope Firshman
SWSarah Wallace
Sarah Wallace
Introduction: National guidelines suggest recommended staffing levels for therapies. The aim of this study was to capture information on existing staffing levels, roles and responsibilities and service structures. Methods: An observational study using online surveys distributed to 245 critical care units across the United Kingdom (UK). Surveys consisted of a generic and five profession specific surveys. Results: Eight hundred sixty-two responses were received from 197 critical care units across the UK. Of those that responded, over 96% of units had input from dietetics, physiotherapy and SLT. Whereas only 59.1% and 48.1% had an OT or psychology service respectively. Units with ring fenced services had improved therapist to patient ratios. Discussion: There is significant variation in access to therapists for patients admitted to critical care in the UK, with many services not having services for core therapies such as psychology and OT. Where services do exist, they fall below the recommended guidance.

4 December 2024 in Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ETElla Terblanche
Ella Terblanche
JMJudith Merriweather
Judith Merriweather
MBMina Bharal
Mina Bharal
RLRhiannon Lewis
Rhiannon Lewis
LWLiesl Wandrag
Liesl Wandrag

3 March 2022 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ETElla Terblanche
Ella Terblanche
JHJessica Hills
Jessica Hills
EREdie Russell
Edie Russell
RLRhiannon Lewis
Rhiannon Lewis
LRLouise Rose
Louise Rose
Background: In this study, a report of dietitian-led nutrition interventions for patients with COVID-19 during ICU and ward-based rehabilitation is provided. As knowledge of COVID-19 and its medical treatments evolved through the course of the pandemic, dietetic-led interventions were compared between surge 1 (S1) and surge 2 (S2). Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted of patients admitted to the ICU service in a large academic hospital (London, UK). Clinical and nutrition data were collected during the first surge (March–June 2020; n = 200) and the second surge (November 2020–March 2021; n = 253) of COVID-19. Results: A total of 453 patients were recruited. All required individualized dietetic-led interventions during ICU admission as the ICU nutrition protocol did not meet nutritional needs. Feed adjustments for deranged renal function (p = 0.001) and propofol calories (p = 0.001) were more common in S1, whereas adjustment for gastrointestinal dysfunction was more common in S2 (p = 0.001). One-third of all patients were malnourished on ICU admission, and all lost weight in ICU, with a mean (SD) total percentage loss of 8.8% (6.9%). Further weight loss was prevented over the remaining hospital stay with continued dietetic-led interventions. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients have complex nutritional needs due to malnutrition on admission and ongoing weight loss. Disease complexity and evolving nature of medical management required multifaceted dietetic-led nutritional strategies, which differed between surges.

4 January 2023 in Australian Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PTPaul Twose
Paul Twose
ETElla Terblanche
Ella Terblanche
UJUna Jones
Una Jones
PFPenelope Firshman
Penelope Firshman
JMJudith Merriweather
Judith Merriweather
SWSarah Wallace
Sarah Wallace
The existing United Kingdom (UK) allied health professional (AHP) workforce in critical care does not meet national standards, with widespread variation in the source of funding, service availability, and regularity of input. The aim of this subanalysis was to determine the impact of protected services on the involvement of AHPs on direct and nondirect aspects of patient care. This is a subanalysis of the previously published AHPs in critical care UK-wide workforce survey, an observational study using online surveys distributed to 245 critical care units across the UK. Services with protected funding provided more daily input within critical care. This was most apparent for occupational therapy where daily input varied from 82.1% of units with protected services compared to just 10.3% in those without (p < 0.001). For all professions, most notably occupational therapy and speech and language therapy, protected services increased the regularity in which specific interventions were completed and had impact on involvement in nonclinical aspects of care including involved in multidisciplinary team meetings, clinical governance, and research. The absence of protected AHP services reduces compliance with national standards for therapy workforce. Based on these findings, UK and international critical care guidelines should promote protected AHP services for critical care.