Ireland is a country with a low incidence of tuberculosis (TB) (5.6 cases per 100,000 population in 2019) that should be aiming for TB elimination (fewer than 1 case per million of population). To achieve TB elimination in low-incidence countries, programmatic latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) management is important. This requires high-quality latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening. Aim: To assess the quality of LTBI screening in a tertiary centre in Ireland using a framework. Methods: A retrospective review of the health care records of patients screened for TB in a tertiary centre in Ireland using an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) between 2016 and 2018 was performed. Three domains from the Institute of Medicine framework for health care quality, effectiveness, efficiency, and equity, were applied to measure the quality of LTBI screening. Results: Forty patients had LTBI and an indication for treatment, of whom 20% (8/40) were not offered treatment by the health care provider, 2.5% (1/40) did not accept treatment, and 10% (4/40) did not complete treatment. Seventy-five percent (6/8) of patients not offered treatment were non-Irish. The cost of screening per LTBI case identified was EUR 2048. Conclusions: This study evaluated the quality of LTBI screening using a framework and identified that LTBI screening in this tertiary centre needs to be scaled and expanded, and that treatment initiation needs to be improved, particularly among non-Irish nationals.
This case highlights the use of (1,3)-beta-d glucan to direct treatment of a cervical spinal cord Aspergillus fumigatus infection in a 22-year-old woman immunocompromised due to steroid and anti-TNF therapy in the context of ulcerative colitis and interferon gamma deficiency. A 4-year treatment course requiring neurosurgical intervention on four occasions and prolonged antifungal therapy, including isavuconazole, resulted in clinical cure with a corresponding decrease in CSF beta-d-glucan to <30 pg/mL. Serum and CSF galactomannan levels were not elevated at any point during the clinical course.
The healthcare needs of refugees and people seeking asylum are often broad and complex, with a higher burden of communicable diseases. There are limited data describing migrants’ experiences of accessing healthcare in Ireland. This cross-sectional study describes the experiences of migrants accessing healthcare services through an Irish Infectious Diseases clinic. Individuals attending the infectious diseases services in our hospital who had migrated to Ireland were included. Data were collected via a questionnaire, focusing on factors that may limit access to care, including communication, accessibility, cost, and stigmatisation. Seventy-six patients participated in this study. N = 20 (26%) of patients reported a commuting time of more than two hours to attend our clinic. N = 11 (15%) had experienced being unable to access healthcare in Ireland due to cost. Trust in healthcare providers was high (88%), and patient-reported satisfaction with communication was high (>90%). Persons living in direct provision services were more likely to report issues around privacy and less likely to have registered with a general practitioner. Accessibility and privacy were among the biggest challenges faced by migrants attending infectious diseases services at our centre, while communication and trust in healthcare providers were identified as areas of strength. Considering the burden of infectious diseases in migrant populations, and the challenges that certain migrant populations face in accessing healthcare, it is important to identify potential barriers to accessing care in order to ensure equitable, effective care. This study seeks to identify and describe the challenges that migrants face when accessing care through an Irish infectious diseases clinic. The results can help inform service provision and allocation of resources at a local level, while also identifying an area for further research regarding the barriers to accessing care faced by migrant communities in Ireland.