Eveline Wuttke

Prof. Dr. Eveline Wuttke

Faculty of Economics and Business, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 December 2020 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJulia Lischewski
Julia Lischewski
SSSusan Seeber
Susan Seeber
EWEveline Wuttke
Eveline Wuttke
TRTherese Rosemann
Therese Rosemann
Participation in further education is a central success factor for economic growth and societal as well as individual development. This is especially true today because in most industrialized countries, labor markets and work processes are changing rapidly. Data on further education, however, show that not everybody participates and that different social groups participate to different degrees. Activities in continuous vocational education and training (CVET) are mainly differentiated as formal, non-formal and informal CVET, whereby further differences between offers of non-formal and informal CVET are seldom elaborated. Furthermore, reasons for participation or non-participation are often neglected. In this study, we therefore analyze and compare predictors for participation in both forms of CVET, namely, non-formal and informal. To learn more about the reasons for participation, we focus on the individual perspective of employees (invidual factors, job-related factors, and learning biography) and additionally integrate institutional characteristics (workplace and company-based characteristics). The results mainly show that non-formal CVET is still strongly influenced by institutional settings. In the case of informal CVET, on the other hand, the learning biography plays a central role.

8 August 2015 in Peabody Journal of Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFranziska Bouley
Franziska Bouley
EWEveline Wuttke
Eveline Wuttke
KSKathleen Schnick-Vollmer
Kathleen Schnick-Vollmer
BSBernhard Schmitz
Bernhard Schmitz
SBStefanie Berger
Stefanie Berger
JSJürgen Seifried
Jürgen Seifried
Teacher competence is crucial for quality of teaching and learner achievement. Competency models and competence measurement are prevalent in domains such as the natural sciences and lacking in others. We conducted our research in the field of business and economics education by focusing on the accounting domain because it is key to a deep understanding of the economic context and the development of economics competence. To teach well, teachers require professional knowledge, which is mainly composed of content knowledge (CK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and pedagogical knowledge (PK). Our competence model comprises the cognitive component of professional knowledge and the noncognitive components of beliefs, self-efficacy, and self-regulation. To measure competence in competence of prospective teachers, we employed novel instruments to test for professional knowledge and beliefs as well as established ones to test for self-regulation and self-efficacy. The sample consists of 1,152 students at 24 German universities. The structure of the competence model was tested. Results suggest that professional competence in accounting has at least four distinct dimensions (CK, PCK, beliefs, and self-regulation aspects).

8 March 2015 in Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SFSabine Fritsch
Sabine Fritsch
SBStefanie Berger
Stefanie Berger
JSJürgen Seifried
Jürgen Seifried
FBFranziska Bouley
Franziska Bouley
EWEveline Wuttke
Eveline Wuttke
BSBernhard Schmitz
Bernhard Schmitz
As teacher training plays a major role in the development of (prospective) teachers’ knowledge, differences between the professional knowledge of prospective teachers at Austrian and German universities were examined in the current study. The teacher training systems of business and economic education in both countries differ substantially regarding structure and content. The German system consists of two consecutive phases with different foci (university education with an emphasis on theories and domain-specific knowledge, followed by school-based practical training with the objective of acquiring practical experience). Thus, in Germany, opportunities to learn (OTL) mainly cover domain-specific knowledge with less focus on didactics and teaching experience. In contrast, Austrian universities offer an integrated approach that combines the two phases (i.e., theoretical input and practical teaching experiences are closely linked) at the university level.


1 March 2000 in Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EWEveline Wuttke
Eveline Wuttke