Objectives: Vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (vulvar HSIL) or vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is a premalignant condition that can progress to carcinoma. Imiquimod is a topical drug with high effectiveness and low morbidity. We aimed (1) to assess the long-term response to imiquimod in a cohort of patients with vulvar HSIL and (2) and to analyze the role of HPV determined in pre- and post-imiquimod treatment biopsies in the persistence or recurrence of vulvar HSIL. Design: Retrospective study between 2011 and 2022. Setting: Referrals from the primary care area of Baix Llobregat treated in the gynecology department of a university hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Population: 20 women with vulvar HSIL treated with imiquimod. Methods: The inclusion criteria were vulvar HSIL, vulvar HPV determination by pre- and post-treatment biopsy, acceptance of medical treatment, at least one follow-up and 4 weeks of treatment. Main outcome measures: Histological diagnosis of vulvar HSIL with pre- and post-imiquimod HPV determination. Response to treatment (complete, partial, no response, recurrence). Results: After imiquimod, 10 (50%) and 6 (30%) cases had complete and partial responses, respectively. Another 4 cases (20%) did not respond. Before treatment, 19 (95%) cases were positive for vulvar HPV (16 cases had HPV type 16). After treatment, 10 cases (50%) were positive for HPV (8 cases with HPV type 16): 2 cases (20%) with a complete response, 5 cases (83.3%) with a partial response and 3 cases (75%) with no response. Eight of the 10 HPV-negative cases (80%) post-treatment showed a complete response. HPV type 16 was present in 16 cases (84.2%) pre-treatment and in 8 cases (80%) post-treatment. Ten patients underwent additional treatments following a partial response, no response or recurrence. The 2 HIV and 3 immunosuppressed patients treated with imiquimod showed a partial response and required additional treatment. All these patients were HPV-positive pre- and post-treatment (100%). Response to imiquimod was associated with post-treatment vulvar HPV positivity (p = 0.03). The median time to a complete response in HPV-negative cases was 4.7 months versus 11.5 months in HPV-positive cases post-imiquimod treatment. Recurrence of vulvar HSIL was observed in 7 patients (35%), with a median time to recurrence of 19.7 months (range 3.2–32.7). Recurrence was experienced in 10% of cases with a complete response, in 4/6 (66.6%) cases with a partial response, and in 2/4 (50%) women with no response. Four of the 7 recurrent cases (57%) were infected with HIV or immunosuppressed. Six (85%) of the recurrent cases were HPV-positive post-treatment (all were HPV type 16). Four (30.7%) of the non-recurrent cases were HPV-positive post-treatment with imiquimod (p = 0.05), two of which were HPV type 16 (50%). Conclusions: Imiquimod effectively treats vulvar HSIL. Cases with a complete response showed less HPV positivity post-treatment than partial or non-response cases. Recurrences were more frequent in those with a partial or no response to imiquimod, and in immunosuppressed patients. In recurrent cases, 85% were HPV-positive post-treatment, while 30.7% of non-recurrent cases were HPV-positive. HPV positivity in the post-treatment biopsy suggests the need for stricter follow-up of patients.

This study aimed to assess whether surgical practice had a significant impact on oncological outcomes among women who underwent robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer (≤IB1 or IIA1, FIGO 2009). The secondary objective was to audit the pre-surgical quality indicators (QI) proposed by the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO). The top 5 of 10 centers in Spain and Portugal were included in the analysis. The hospitals were divided into group A (n = 118) and group B (n = 97), with recurrence rates of 10%, respectively. After balancing both groups using the propensity score, the ORs for all events were higher and statistically significant for group B (recurrences OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.13–1.15, p-value = 0.001; death OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02–1.18, p-value = 0.012; disease-specific mortality OR_r = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.04–1.19, p-value = 0.002). A higher surgical volume, higher participation in clinical trials, higher rate of MRI use for diagnosis, greater use of sentinel lymph node biopsies, and a favorable learning curve with low rates of early recurrences were observed among the centers with better oncological outcomes. These factors might have a significant impact on oncological outcomes not only after robot-assisted surgery, but also after laparoscopies and open surgeries in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Background: to prove the effectivity of fertility-sparing procedures in early-stage ovarian cancer by assessing pregnancy rates and obstetrical outcomes. Methods: we performed a retrospective multicenter study among 55 Spanish hospitals, collecting patients from 18 to 40 years old with diagnosis of early-stage ovarian cancer, epithelial (EOC) or non-epithelial (non-EOC), from January 2010 to December 2019. Data on the use of assisted reproductive techniques, pregnancy attempts and obstetrical outcomes were collected. Results: a total of 150 patients met inclusion criteria, 70 (46.6%) EOC and 80 (53.4%) non-EOC. Pregnancy attempts were reported in 51 (34%) patients, with 42 (28%) patients carrying the pregnancy to term. Among them, 30 (71.4%) underwent surgery alone and 12 (28.6%) had additional postoperative chemotherapy. A total of 32 (76.1% patients) had spontaneous pregnancies and 10 (23.9%) required in vitro fertilization. There was only one (2.4%) complication reported. Vaginal delivery was reported in twenty-nine (69%) patients and cesarean section in five (11.9%) patients. Conclusions: fertility-sparing management for ovarian cancer seems to be an option with proven good pregnancy rates and low complications. The selection of patients must consider strict criteria in order to maintain a good prognosis.

Introduction: Surgery is the main pilar for the treatment of ovarian cancer patients. The improvement of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has led to its application to a greater number of processes. However, MIS for ovarian cancer is still under debate, since the behaviour of ovarian cancer and its pattern of spread make difficult to assure a proper surgery with this approach. Our aim was to evaluate the advantages of MIS in the management of ovarian cancer among young patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with the participation of 55 Spanish hospitals. We included all patients aged between 18 and 45 years old who were diagnosed of invasive ovarian cancer from 2010 to 2019. Histological diagnosis was mandatory in all cases. All patients underwent surgery, that could be the initial treatment or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Depending on preoperative workup and surgical expertise, surgical approach was either laparotomic or MIS. All data regarding the perioperative details as well as prognostic factors were compared in regards to the type of surgical approach. Results: A total of 1144 patients were collected, among them, 867 (75.8%) underwent laparotomy and 277 (24.2%) MIS. Epithelial tumors were diagnosed in 992 (86.7%) patients and non epithelial cancers in 152 (13.3%). Complications such as blood loss, lenght of surgery and hospital stay were higher in the laparotomy group, and was statistically significant (p< 0.0001). Recurrences were present in 353 (30.85%) patients, wich were 302 (26.4%) in the open surgery group and 51 (4.45%) in the MIS (p < 0.0001). Deaths were reported in 199 (17.4%) patients, that were 169 (14.8%) after open surgery and 30 (2.6%) after MIS (p = 0.0026). Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgery does not seem to impact negatively in the prognosis of young patients with ovarian cancer. Its use has been mainly for staging surgery in early- stage tumors, proving its safety. Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) after MIS have shown its superiority over open surgery, with statistically significant differences. Nonetheless, those results are highly influenced by the predominance of early- stage and low burden disease tumors in the MIS group.Moreover, there are confounding variables that seem to influence in those results, such as age, tumor size, FIGO stage and histology, which are important to consider in order to choose the best surgical approach. When the selection of patients is adequate, MIS does not entail worse prognosis than laparotomy, for ovarian cancer surgery.