Selwyn Prea

Mr. Selwyn Prea


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSelwyn Prea
Selwyn Prea
AVAlgis Jonas Vingrys
Algis Jonas Vingrys
YKYu Xiang George Kong
Yu Xiang George Kong
Background: Our primary aim is to quantify test reliability and compliance of glaucoma patients to a weekly visual field telemedicine (VFTM) schedule. A secondary aim is to determine concordance of the VFTM results to in-clinic outcomes. Methods: Participants with stable glaucoma in one eye were recruited for a 12 month VFTM trial using the Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF-home, MRFh) iPad application. Participants attended routine 6 month clinical reviews and were tasked with weekly home monitoring with the MRFh over this period. We determined compliance to weekly VFTM (7 + 1 days) and test reliability (false positives (FPs) and fixation loss (FL) <33%). A secondary aim considered concordance to in-clinic measures of visual field (MRF-clinic (MRFc) and the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA)) in active participants (≥10 home examinations and 5 reliable HFA examinations). The linear trend in the MRFh mean deviation (MD) was compared to the HFA guided progression analysis (GPA) using Bland–Altman methods. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. Results: Forty-seven participants with a mean age of 64 ± 14.6 years were recruited for the trial. The VFTM uptake was 85% and compliance to weekly home monitoring was 75% in the presence of weekly text reminders in the analysed group (n = 20). The analysed group was composed of test subjects with five reliable in-clinic HFA examinations (GPA analysis available) and who submitted a minimum of 10 MRFh examinations from home. Of the 757 home examinations returned, approximately two-thirds were reliable, which was significantly lower than the test reliability of the HFA in-clinic (MRFh: 65% vs. HFA: 85%, p < 0.001). The HFA-GPA analysis gave little bias from the MRFh slope (bias: 0.05 dB/yr, p > 0.05). Two eyes were found to have clinical progression during the 12 month period, and both were detected by VFTM. Conclusions: VFTM over 12 months returned good compliance (75%) to weekly testing with good concordance to in-clinic assays. VFTM is a viable option for monitoring patients with glaucoma for visual field progression in between clinical visits.

5 October 2021 in Journal of Vision
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPhillip Bedggood
Phillip Bedggood
SPSelwyn Prea
Selwyn Prea
YKYu Xiang George Kong
Yu Xiang George Kong
AVAlgis Jonas Vingrys
Algis Jonas Vingrys
The conventional stimulus for standard automated perimetry is fixed in size, giving elevated contrast thresholds and reduced test reliability in the periphery. Here, we test the hypothesis that appropriate scaling of the size of perimetric stimuli will return fixed thresholds and reduced variability across the visual field. We derived frequency-of-seeing (FOS) curves in five healthy subjects at central (3 degrees) and peripheral (27 degrees) locations with a method of constant stimuli (MOCS) using a desktop LCD display. FOS curves for a Goldmann III (GIII) stimulus were compared with those for size scaled spots. To consider clinical translation, we tested a further five healthy subjects (22–24 years) with the Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF) tablet perimeter at several locations spanning 1 degree to 25 degrees from fixation, deriving FOS curves (MOCS) and also conducting repeated adaptive clinical thresholding to assess intra- and interobserver variability. We found that GIII contrast thresholds were significantly elevated in the periphery compared with the parafovea, with concomitant reduction of FOS slope. Using appropriately size scaled spots, threshold and slope differences between these locations were significantly reduced. FOS data collected with the tablet perimeter confirmed that size scaling confers broad equivalence of the shape of the FOS curve across the visual field. Repeated adaptive thresholding with size scaled stimuli gave relatively constant intra-observer variability across the visual field, which compares favorably with published normative data obtained with the GIII stimulus. The reduced variability will improve signal-to-noise ratio for correct classification of normal visual field test results, whereas the lower contrast thresholds yield greater dynamic range, which should improve the ability to reliably monitor moderate defects.

27 March 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSelwyn Prea
Selwyn Prea
RGRobyn Guymer
Robyn Guymer
GKGeorge Kong
George Kong
AVAlgis Jonas Vingrys
Algis Jonas Vingrys
Background: To determine the 12-month compliance with and retention of home monitoring (HM) with Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRFh) for patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD) and compare visual acuity (VA) and retinal sensitivity (RS) results to clinical measures. Methods: Participants were recruited to a 12-month HM study with weekly testing of vision with MRFh. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of iAMD, understand English instructions, VA ≥ 20/40, and access to an iPad. Supervised in-clinic testing of high contrast VA (HVA, ETDRS), low-luminance VA (LLVA, ETDRS with ND2 filter), and RS (Macular Integrity Assessment, MAIA, and MRF in-clinic, MRFc) was conducted every 6-months. Results: A total of 54 participants (67 ± 6.8 years) were enrolled. Compliance to weekly HM was 61% and study retention at 12-months was 50% of those with uptake (n = 46). No difference was observed between MRFc and MRFh across all RS and VA outcomes (p > 0.05). MRFh RS was higher than MAIA (29.1 vs. 27.1 dB, p < 0.001). MRFh HVA was not different from ETDRS (p = 0.08), but LLVA was 9 letters better (81.5 vs. 72.4 letters, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Over 12-months, MRFh yields a moderate level of compliance with (61%) and retention (50%) of weekly testing. Further studies are required to assess the ability of MRFh to detect early progression to nAMD.

27 March 2026 in Education Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPeter Carew
Peter Carew
JPJocelyn Phillips
Jocelyn Phillips
CCCarolyn Cracknell
Carolyn Cracknell
SPSelwyn Prea
Selwyn Prea
DVDebra Virtue
Debra Virtue
THTandy Hastings-Ison
Tandy Hastings-Ison
Authentic, situated learning experiences which mirror the collaborative nature of healthcare practice are essential in preparing students for their future professions. Feedback literacy may be thought of as the understanding, capacity, and disposition needed to make sense of information and use it to enhance work or learning strategies. This study explored how feedback literacy can be developed through situated, interprofessional peer-to-peer feedback within a community-based paediatric health screening programme. Using an exploratory Action Research qualitative design, the planning activities stage explored current practice, gathering student insights via interviews, reflections, and a workshop to co-design an Interprofessional Feedback Conversation Guide (IPFCG). The IPFCG was piloted, integrating structured feedback tools and protected time for peer exchange, within the community screening activity. Feedback regarding use of the IPFCG contributed to the gathering data stage, which was followed by the evaluation and reflection stage. Evaluation revealed four key themes: value, engagement, optimising relationships, and structuring conversations. Students valued receiving feedback from peers outside their discipline, actively engaged with the process, emphasised the importance of building rapport, and utilised structured dialogue. These findings highlight how authentic, field-based learning can foster feedback literacy, enhancing the development of professional identity. The interprofessional nature of the program reflects the complexity of modern healthcare and demonstrates how curriculum-integrated models of authentic learning can enhance student engagement and workplace readiness. This study contributes to the evolving conversation about embedding authenticity in higher education and offers a practical model for building collaborative communication within situated learning experiences at scale.

13 February 2019 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Jiang-Hui WangJiang-Hui Wang
Jiang-Hui Wang
JCJinying Chen
Jinying Chen
DLDamien Ling
Damien Ling
LTLeilei Tu
Leilei Tu
VSVikrant Singh
Vikrant Singh
GLGuei-Sheung Liu
Guei-Sheung Liu
Retinal neovascularization is a severe complication of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are master regulators of gene expression that play important roles in retinal neovascularization. Here, we investigated the retinal miRNA expression profile in a rat model of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) through miRNA-Seq. We found that miR-143-3p, miR-126-3p, miR-150-5p and miR-145-5p were significantly down-regulated in the retina of OIR rats, and directly involved in the development of retinal neovascularization. Of these identified miRNAs, miR-143 is enriched in retina and was first reported being associated with pathological retinal angiogenesis. Our RNA-Seq data further suggested that miR-143 alleviates retinal neovascularization by mediating the inflammation/stress pathways via Fos. Moreover, the computational analysis indicated that Transforming Growth Factor-beta Activated Kinase 1 (TAK1) is involved in several key pathways associated with the dysregulated miRNAs. The pharmacological inhibition of TAK1 suppressed angiogenesis in vitro and retinal neovascularization in vivo. Our data highlight the utility of next-generation sequencing in the development of therapeutics for ocular neovascularization and further suggest that therapeutic targeting the dysregulated miRNAs or TAK1 may be a feasible adjunct therapeutic approach in patients with retinal neovascularization.