Background: The impact of pancreas transplantation, including kidney transplantation on patients’ life prognoses, is unclear in Japan. An analysis of the data of the Japan Pancreas Transplant Registry was performed to compare the patient survival between on the waiting list and after pancreas transplantation, and investigate the factors that affect the patient survival after pancreatic transplantation. Methods: The life prognoses of 361 patients who underwent pancreas transplantation from 2000 to December 2018 were examined. Results: The survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years on the waiting list were 98.4%, 90.3%, and 78.1%, respectively, while those after transplantation were significantly improved (p = 0.029) at 100%, 97.5%, and 88.9%, respectively. Furthermore, the survival rates of patients waiting for simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) at 1, 5, and 10 years were 98.2%, 89.4%, and 75.4%, respectively, while those after SPK were also significantly improved (p = 0.026) at 100%, 94.6%, and 88.8%. The multivariable analysis revealed that the duration of diabetes before surgery was the only independent risk factor (hazard ratio = 1.095, p = 0.012) that affected the patient survival after SPK. Conclusion: Pancreas transplantation was found to improve the life prognosis of patients with type 1 diabetes, especially those with end-stage renal failure waiting for SPK.

Background In Japan, about 30% of pancreatic transplant donors are ≥50 years old, making them “extended criteria donors”. Methods We analyzed 361 cases of transplantation involving donors from the Japanese pancreas transplantation registry to evaluate the acceptability of extended criteria donors. Results The patient survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years after transplantation were 96.6%, 94.9%, and 88.3%, respectively. The survival rates of pancreas and kidney grafts at 1, 5, and 10 years were 85.3%, 74.8%, 70.6% and 94.2%, 90.9%, and 80.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that no particular donor factors significantly influenced the pancreatic graft survival. Patients were divided into 2 groups: donors ≥50 years old (older group) and those <50 years old (younger group). After propensity score matching, the overall pancreatic graft survival at 1, 5, and 10 years after transplantation in the older group was 82.8%, 71.8%, and 69.5%, respectively, which was almost the same as in the younger group (84.9%, 70.2%, and 67.4%, respectively). Conclusions No donor factors markedly influenced the pancreatic graft survival, and the outcomes of pancreas transplantation from extended criteria donors ≥50 years old were comparable to those from younger donors.

Objectives: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can evaluate microcirculation. Thus, we used contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in evaluating pancreas graft perfusion and examined the relationship between graft circulation and function. Methods: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was performed in 17 cases within 24 hours and at 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after transplantation (Tx). The time between the time to peak intensity in the parenchyma and that in the vein was defined as delta-Tp(P-V). Graft function was evaluated with oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 1 and 3 months after Tx, and glucagon stimulation test at 1 month after Tx. Results: Differences in delta-Tp(P-V) between individual cases were more significant early after Tx, and delta-Tp(P-V) within 24 hours (delta-Tp[P-V]_24h) was used in the subsequent analysis. Delta-Tp(P-V)24 hours showed a negative correlation with C-peptide increment in the glucagon stimulation test and the area under the curve of insulin level in oral glucose tolerance test. The cases were divided into the following 2 groups: the standard group (delta-Tp[P-V]_24h ≤6.10 seconds) and the delayed group (>6.10 seconds). The area under the curve of insulin level increased significantly from 1 to 3 months after Tx in the standard group only. Conclusions: These results suggest that delta-Tp(P-V)24 hours affects insulin secretion after Tx. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is useful in predicting endocrine function of the graft.

Background: The pool of brain-dead donors (BDDs) was increased with the revision to the relevant law in 2010, and islet transplantation from BDDs was started in 2013. The present study assessed the influence of using pancreases from BDDs on islet transplantation in Japan. Methods: The donor information registered with the secretariat of islet transplants from 2012 was reviewed, and the results of 86 clinical islet isolations performed in Japan between 2003 and 2018 with non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) (n = 71) and BDDs (n = 15) were investigated. Results: The number of cases for which donor information was registered with the secretariat of islet transplants increased to 1.84 cases/month from 2013 to 2018 in comparison to 1.44/month in 2012, when only NHBDs were used. The median pancreatic islet yield was 275,550 IEQ (Islet equivalents) in the NHBD group but 362,700 in the BDD group, which amounted to a statistically significant difference (p = 0.02). As a result, 38/71 cases (53.5%) were achieved successful islet isolation (>5000 IEQ per recipient weight (kg)) was achieved in 38/71 cases (53.5%) in the NHBD group, and 12/15 cases (80.0%) in the BDD group; thus, the rate of successful islet transplantation was higher in the BDD group. Conclusion: The use of pancreases from BDDs has increased the overall number of cases for which donor information is registered with the secretariat of islet transplants and has improved the performance of islet isolation, thereby increasing the probability of successfully achieving islet transplantation.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pancreatic transplantation from pediatric donors younger than 15 years of age to the outcomes of pancreatic transplantation from adult donors. Methods: Sixty patients underwent pancreatic transplantation in our facility from August 2012 to June 2019. These patients were divided into two groups according to the age of the donor: Cases in which the donor was younger than 15 years of age were classified into the PD group (n = 7), while those in which the donor was older than 15 years of age were classified into the AD group (n = 53). The outcomes of pancreas transplantation were retrospectively compared between the two groups. Results: Pancreatic graft survival did not differ between the PD and AD groups. Furthermore, there were no differences in the HbA1c and serum creatinine levels at three months, with good values maintained in both groups. The results of oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) revealed that the blood glucose concentration did not differ between the two groups. However, the serum insulin concentration at 30 min after 75 g glucose loading was significantly higher in the PD group. Conclusion: The outcomes of pancreatic transplantation from pediatric donors may be comparable to those of pancreatic transplantation from adult donors and the insulin secretion ability after transplantation may be better.