In clinical practice, the burden of repeated injections in children with rheumatic disease receiving disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs is significant. To investigate the nature and extent of impact on the quality of life after repeated injections, we conducted a literature review. Two relevant papers were identified, both about children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) being administered methotrexate. The results suggest that the combination of needle fear, impact of methotrexate treatment, and procedural consequences, e.g., blood sampling, all contribute to the distress and the loss of quality of life of children with JIA. Remarkably, no studies examining fear of injections or injection pain in children with rheumatic diseases receiving biologicals were identified. Conclusion: Strategies to optimize administration of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs should be systematically investigated. What is Known: • Repeated parenteral administration of drugs is burdensome for children with rheumatic diseases. What is New: • Needle fear should be investigated systematically to optimize administration of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

This study evaluated and characterized the pharmacological activity of the orally administered interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) inhibitors BAY1834845 (zabedosertib) and BAY1830839 in healthy male volunteers. Participants received one of either IRAK4 inhibitors or a control treatment (prednisolone 20 mg or placebo) twice daily for 7 days. Localized skin inflammation was induced by topical application of imiquimod (IMQ) cream for 3 days, starting at Day 3 of treatment. The inflammatory response was evaluated by laser speckle contrast imaging (skin perfusion) and multispectral imaging (erythema). At Day 7, participants received 1 ng/kg intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Circulating inflammatory proteins, leukocyte differentiation, acute phase proteins, and clinical parameters were evaluated before and after the systemic LPS challenge. Treatment with BAY1834845 significantly reduced the mean IMQ‐induced skin perfusion response (geometric mean ratio [GMR] vs. placebo: 0.69 for BAY1834845, 0.70 for prednisolone; both p < 0.05). Treatment with BAY1834845 and BAY1830839 significantly reduced IMQ‐induced erythema (GMR vs. placebo: 0.75 and 0.83, respectively, both p < 0.05; 0.86 for prednisolone, not significant). Both IRAK4 inhibitors significantly suppressed the serum TNF‐α and IL‐6 responses (≥80% suppression vs. placebo, p < 0.05) and inhibited C‐reactive protein, procalcitonin, and IL‐8 responses to intravenous LPS. This study demonstrated the pharmacological effectiveness of BAY1834845 and BAY1830839 in suppressing systemically and locally induced inflammatory responses in the same range as prednisolone, underlining the potential value of these IRAK4 inhibitors as future therapies for dermatological or other immune‐mediated inflammatory diseases.

Objective: This study aimed to examine potential discriminatory characteristics of dermatoscopy and dynamic optical coherence tomography (D-OCT) on vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (vHSIL) and lichen sclerosus (LS) compared with healthy vulvar skin. Methods: A prospective observational clinical trial was performed in 10 healthy volunteers, 5 vHSIL and 10 LS patients. Noninvasive imaging measurements using dermatoscopy and D-OCT were obtained at several time points, including lesional and nonlesional vulvar skin. Morphologic features of vHSIL and LS were compared with healthy controls. Epidermal thickness and blood flow were determined using D-OCT. Patients reported tolerability of each study procedure, including reference vulvar biopsies. The main outcome measures were feasibility and tolerability of imaging modalities, dermatoscopy and OCT characteristics, OCT epidermal thickness and D-OCT dermal blood flow. Results: The application of dermatoscopy and D-OCT is feasible and tolerable. In vHSIL, dermatoscopic warty structures were present. In LS, sclerotic areas and arborizing vessels were observed. Structural OCT in the vulvar area aligned with histology for hyperkeratosis and dermal-epidermal junction visualization. Currently, the OCT algorithm is unable to calculate the epidermal thickness of the uneven vulvar area. Dynamic optical coherence tomography showed statistically significant increased blood flow in LS patients (mean ± SD, 0.053 ± 0.029) to healthy controls (0.040 ± 0.012; p = .0024). Conclusions: The application of dermatoscopy and D-OCT is feasible and tolerable in vHSIL and LS patients. Using dermatoscopy and D-OCT, the authors describe potential characteristics to aid differentiation of diseased from healthy vulvar skin, which could complement clinical assessments.

Development of pharmacological interventions for wound treatment is challenging due to both poorly understood wound healing mechanisms and heterogeneous patient populations. A standardized and well‐characterized wound healing model in healthy volunteers is needed to aid in‐depth pharmacodynamic and efficacy assessments of novel compounds. The current study aims to objectively and comprehensively characterize skin punch biopsy‐induced wounds in healthy volunteers with an integrated, multimodal test battery. Eighteen (18) healthy male and female volunteers received three biopsies on the lower back, which were left to heal without intervention. The wound healing process was characterized using a battery of multimodal, non‐invasive methods as well as histology and qPCR analysis in re‐excised skin punch biopsies. Biophysical and clinical imaging read‐outs returned to baseline values in 28 days. Optical coherence tomography detected cutaneous differences throughout the wound healing progression. qPCR analysis showed involvement of proteins, quantified as mRNA fold increase, in one or more healing phases. All modalities used in the study were able to detect differences over time. Using multidimensional data visualization, we were able to create a distinction between wound healing phases. Clinical and histopathological scoring were concordant with non‐invasive imaging read‐outs. This well‐characterized wound healing model in healthy volunteers will be a valuable tool for the standardized testing of novel wound healing treatments.

Pharmacological challenge models are deployed to evaluate drug effects during clinical development. Intradermal injection of Substance P (SP) neuropeptide, a potential challenge agent for investigating local mediators, is associated with wheal and flare response mediated by the MRGPRX2 receptor. Although dose‐dependent data on SP effects exist, full characterization and information on potential carryover effect after repeated challenge are lacking. This open‐label, two‐part, prospective enabling study of SP intradermal challenge in healthy participants aimed to understand and distinguish between wheal and flare responses following various SP doses. Part 1 included one challenge visit to determine optimum SP dose range for evaluation in part 2, which determined variability in 20 participants and used intradermal microdialysis (IDM) for SP‐challenged skin sampling. At 5, 15, 50, and 150 pmol doses, respectively, posterior median area under the curve (AUC; AUC_0–2h) was 4090.4, 5881.2, 8846.8, and 9212.8 mm²/min, for wheal response, and 12020.9, 38154.3, 65470.6, and 67404.4 mm²/min for flare response (SP‐challenge visit 2). When the challenge was repeated ~2 weeks later, no carryover effect was observed. IDM histamine levels were relatively low, resulting in low confidence in the data to define temporal characteristics for histamine release following SP challenge. No safety concerns were identified using SP. Wheal and flare responses following intradermal SP challenge were dose‐dependent and different. The results indicate that this challenge model is fit‐for‐purpose in future first‐in‐human studies and further assessment of novel drugs targeting dermal inflammatory disease responses, such as chronic spontaneous urticaria, chronic inducible urticaria, and pseudo‐allergic reactions.

Non-healing wounds represent a substantial medical burden with few effective treatments available. To address this challenge, we developed a novel epidermal wound healing model using suction blisters in healthy volunteers. This model allowed for the comprehensive assessment of wound healing dynamics and the evaluation of INM-755, a topical cream containing cannabinol, as a potential therapeutic agent. Two clinical studies were conducted: an observational study and an interventional study. In both studies, healthy volunteers underwent a suction blister procedure on their lower back, creating open epidermal wounds. Wound healing parameters were assessed using advanced imaging systems. Skin barrier function and perfusion were evaluated through trans epidermal water loss (TEWL) and dynamic optical coherence tomography (D-OCT), respectively. The observational study demonstrated the successful and reproducible induction of blisters and the removal of epidermal sheet, enabling quantifiable measurements of wound healing parameters over time. Re-epithelialization was observed, revealing recovery of skin barrier function and perfusion. In the interventional study, differences of treatments over time were quantified using the above-described techniques. Despite differences from disease-specific blistering, our developed model provides a valuable platform for studying wound healing mechanisms and assessing novel therapeutic interventions. The sensitivity to treatment effects demonstrated in our study underscores the potential utility of this model in early-phase clinical drug development programs targeting wound healing disorders.