Yusup Yuldashbaev

Yusup Yuldashbaev


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 January 2023 in Veterinary World
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IBIndira Beishova
Indira Beishova
ABAlena Valentinovna Belaya
Alena Valentinovna Belaya
YYYusup Yuldashbaev
Yusup Yuldashbaev
GCGulzhagan Dzhambulovna Chuzhebayeva
Gulzhagan Dzhambulovna Chuzhebayeva
VUVadim Ulyanov
Vadim Ulyanov
ANAidar Namet
Aidar Namet
Background and Aim: Bacterial and viral infections affect the welfare of animals and lead to large economic losses in dairy cattle breeding due to decreased productive indicators and increased culling rates. In modern dairy farming, farmers are looking for effective solutions to prevent and minimize infectious disease risks. To this end, the most relevant study field is the search for gene sites that impact production and health. This study aimed to determine the nature of the distribution of the relative frequencies of alleles and genotypes of polymorphic prolactin (PRL) and nitric oxide synthase (NOS2) in Holstein cows and identify the relationship of these genes with resistance to mastitis and bovine leukemia. Materials and Methods: For this study, we chose cows because infectious diseases affect the amount of lactation and milk quality. Holstein cattle with mastitis and bovine leukemia were selected. Animal genotypes were determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products. The results were analyzed using a nonparametric statistical method using Microsoft Excel 2010 and Statistica 6.0. Results: In healthy animals, 94 genotypes were identified for both genes under study. For bPRL, bPRL-RsaIAA (72) was the most common genotype and bPRL-RsaIBB (4) the least; for NOS2, bNOS2-HinfIAB (47) was the most common genotype and bNOS2-HinfIAA the least (21). In animals with leukemia, 34 genotypes were identified. For PRL, bPRL-RsaIAA (25) was the most common genotype and bPRL-RsaIBB (2) the least; for NOS2, bNOS2-HinfIBB (17) was the most common genotype and bNOS2-HinfIAA (3) the least. In animals with mastitis, 67 genotypes were identified. For PRL, bPRL-RsaIAA (43) was the most common genotype and bPRL-RsaIBB (6) the least; for NOS2, bNOS2-HinfIBB (31) was the most common genotype and bNOS2-HinfIAA (7) the least. The distribution of genotypes of polymorphic bPRL and bNOS2 generally coincides, and bPRL-RsaIBB is the most common genotype. In groups of sick animals, the number of bNOS2-HinfIAA homozygotes was lower than that of the control group. In particular, the proportion of animals with the bNOS2-HinfIAA genotype with bovine leukemia was 8.7% and with mastitis was 10.3% compared with 22.4% in healthy animals. These data support the possible association of the bNOS2-HinfIAA genotype with resistance to infection. The frequency of the bPRL-RsaIB allele was higher in groups of sick animals. This allele is associated with increased milk productivity, suggesting that highly productive animals are less resistant to the incidence of viral bovine leukemia and mastitis of bacterial etiology. Conclusion: DNA amplification of Holstein cattle for the polymorphic regions of PRL and NOS2 using the PCR-RFLP method revealed a possible connection between the distribution of relative allele frequencies of bPRL and bNOS2 and resistance to viral and bacterial infections. Thus, in groups of sick animals, the frequency of bPRL-RsaIBB, associated with increased milk production compared with the theoretically calculated equilibrium value was higher and the number of homozygotes bNOS2-HinfIAA was lower than in the control group. In conclusion, animals with increased milk production were more prone to diseases, such as mastitis and bovine leukemia.

13 September 2020 in Agrarian science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDastanbek Asylbekovich Baimukanov
Dastanbek Asylbekovich Baimukanov
YYYusup Yuldashbaev
Yusup Yuldashbaev
KIKairat Iskhan
Kairat Iskhan
VDV. A. Demin
V. A. Demin
ЮЮЮ. А. Юлдашбаев
Ю. А. Юлдашбаев
Концепция развития продуктивного и племенного верблюдоводства Республики Казахстан на 2021-2030 годы

15 August 2019 in THE BULLETIN
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SAS. K. Abugaliyev
S. K. Abugaliyev
YYYusup Yuldashbaev
Yusup Yuldashbaev
ABA. D. Baimukanov
A. D. Baimukanov
LBL. R. Bupebayeva
L. R. Bupebayeva

15 April 2019 in THE BULLETIN
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDastanbek Asylbekovich Baimukanov
Dastanbek Asylbekovich Baimukanov
VPVasily Pristupa
Vasily Pristupa
YKYuri Kolosov
Yuri Kolosov
IDIrina M. Donnik
Irina M. Donnik
DTD. S. Torosyan
D. S. Torosyan
SCSalbak Chylbak-Ool
Salbak Chylbak-Ool

15 December 2019 in THE BULLETIN
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASA. S. Shuvarikov
A. S. Shuvarikov
DBDastanbek Asylbekovich Baimukanov
Dastanbek Asylbekovich Baimukanov
MDM. I. Dunin
M. I. Dunin
OPO. N. Pastukh
O. N. Pastukh
EZE. V. Zhukova
E. V. Zhukova
EKE. А. Karasev
E. А. Karasev

17 June 2022 in Agrarian science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ENE. A. Nikonova
E. A. Nikonova
YYYusup Yuldashbaev
Yusup Yuldashbaev
VKV. I. Kosilov
V. I. Kosilov
SSS. V. Savchuk
S. V. Savchuk
ЮЮЮ. А. Юлдашбаев
Ю. А. Юлдашбаев
Relevance. With the organization of optimal conditions for keeping and full-fledged, balanced feeding, a more complete realization of the bioresource potential of meat productivity is possible. Interbreeding contributes to the production of crossbred young animals, which, due to enriched heredity, have the potential for intensive growth and achieving a high level of meat productivity.Methods. For the study, 3 groups of bulls of the following genotype were formed from newborn young animals: I — Kazakh white-headed, II — 1/2 Hereford x 1/2 Kazakh white-headed, III — 3/4 Kazakh white-headed x 1/4 Hereford.Results. It was established that due to a more significant manifestation of the effect of crossing, the crossbred bulls of the II group (1/2 Hereford x 1/2 Kazakh whitehead) were superior to the crossbred peers of the III group (3/4 Kazakh whitehead x 1/4 Hereford) in the consumption of all types of nutrients. It is suffice to say that this advantage in dry matter intake was 98.9 g (1.1%), organic matter — 87.9 g (1.1%), crude protein — 18.8 g (1.4%), crude fat — 3.8 g (1.3%), crude fiber — 28.2 g (1.4%), nitrogen-free extractives — 37.1 g (0.9%). The obtained experimental data indicate the influence of the genotype of young animals on the value of the coefficient of digestibility of nutrients in the diet. At the same time, crossbred bulls of groups II and III better than purebred peers of the Kazakh white-headed breed used the nutrients of the feed diet that entered the body. This is evidenced by the value of the coefficient of their digestibility. It was found that the maximum consumption of all types of energy was characterized by crossbred half-blooded (1/2 Hereford x 1/2 Kazakh white-headed) bulls of group II.