Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of various tumors, yet radioresistance often leads to treatment failure and tumor recurrence. Several factors contribute to this resistance, including hypoxia, DNA repair mechanisms, and cancer stem cells. This review explores the diverse elements that drive tumor radiotherapy resistance. Historically, resistance has been attributed to cellular repair and tumor repopulation, but recent research has expanded this understanding. The tumor microenvironment – characterized by hypoxia, immune evasion, and stromal interactions – further complicates treatment. Additionally, molecular mechanisms such as aberrant signaling pathways, epigenetic modifications, and non-B-DNA structures play significant roles in mediating resistance. This review synthesizes current knowledge, highlighting the interplay of these factors and their clinical implications. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing strategies to overcome resistance and improve therapeutic outcomes in cancer patients.

Radiotherapy is a vital approach for brain tumor treatment. The standard treatment for glioblastoma (GB) is maximal surgical resection combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, the non-sensitivity of tumor cells in the hypoxic area of solid tumors to radiotherapy may cause radioresistance. Therefore, radiotherapy sensitizers that increase the oxygen concentration within the tumor are promising for increasing the effectiveness of radiation. Inspired by hemoglobin allosteric oxygen release regulators, a series of novel phenoxyacetic acid analogues were designed and synthesized. A numerical method was applied to determine the activity and safety of newly synthesized compounds. In vitro studies on the evaluation of red blood cells revealed that compounds 19c (∆P₅₀ = 45.50 mmHg) and 19t (∆P₅₀ = 44.38 mmHg) improve the oxygen-releasing property effectively compared to positive control efaproxiral (∆P₅₀ = 36.40 mmHg). Preliminary safety evaluation revealed that 19c exhibited no cytotoxicity towards HEK293 and U87MG cells, while 19t was cytotoxic toward both cells with no selectivity. An in vivo activity assay confirmed that 19c exhibited a radiosensitization effect on orthotopically transplanted GB in mouse brains. Moreover, a pharmacokinetic study in rats showed that 19c was orally available.