Numerous reports of graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) promoting plant growth have opened up a wide range of promising potential applications in agroforestry. However, several toxicity studies have raised growing concerns about the biosafety of GFNs. Although these studies have provided clues about the role of GFNs from different perspectives (such as plant physiology, biochemistry, cytology, and molecular biology), the mechanisms by which GFNs affect plant growth remain poorly understood. In particular, a systematic collection of data regarding differentially expressed genes in response to GFN treatment has not been conducted. We summarize here the fate and biological effects of GFNs in plants. We propose that soil environments may be conducive to the positive effects of GFNs but may be detrimental to the absorption of GFNs. Alterations in plant physiology, biochemistry, cytological structure, and gene expression in response to GFN treatment are discussed. Coincidentally, many changes from the morphological to biochemical scales, which are caused by GFNs treatment, such as affecting root growth, disrupting cell membrane structure, and altering antioxidant systems and hormone concentrations, can all be mapped to gene expression level. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the effects of GFNs on plant growth to promote their safe and efficient use.

Tuberculosis is a chronic and lethal infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In previous decades, most studies in this area focused on the pathogenesis and drug targets for disease treatments. However, the emergence of drug-resistant strains has increased the difficulty of clinical trials over time. Now, more post-translational modified proteins in Mycobacterium tuberculosis have been discovered. Evidence suggests that these proteins have the ability to influence tuberculosis drug resistance. Hence, this paper systematically summarizes updated research on the impacts of protein acylation and phosphorylation on the acquisition of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis through acylation and phosphorylation protein regulating processes. This provides us with a better understanding of the mechanism of antituberculosis drugs and may contribute to a reduction the harm that tuberculosis brings to society, as well as aiding in the discovery of new drug targets and therapeutic regimen adjustments in the future.

The past decades have witnessed intensive research on the biological effects of graphene-based nanomaterials (GBNs) and the application of GBNs in different fields. The published literature shows that GBNs exhibit inhibitory effects on almost all microorganisms under pure culture conditions, and that this inhibitory effect is influenced by the microbial species, the GBN’s physicochemical properties, the GBN’s concentration, treatment time, and experimental surroundings. In addition, microorganisms exist in the soil in the form of microbial communities. Considering the complex interactions between different soil components, different microbial communities, and GBNs in the soil environment, the effects of GBNs on soil microbial communities are undoubtedly intertwined. Since bacteria and fungi are major players in terrestrial biogeochemistry, this review focuses on the antibacterial and antifungal performance of GBNs, their antimicrobial mechanisms and influencing factors, as well as the impact of this effect on soil microbial communities. This review will provide a better understanding of the effects of GBNs on microorganisms at both the individual and population scales, thus providing an ecologically safe reference for the release of GBNs to different soil environments.

Treating [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] with the amine 2-picolylamine (Picam) ligand in a 1:1 molar ratio, the Ru(II) complex trans-Ru(PPh₃)₂(Picam)Cl₂ (1) is obtained in methylene chloride and can be isolated as a pure solid compound. The single-crystal structure of 1 was determined by X-ray crystallography. The geometry at the Ru metal center is a distorted octahedral environment with a trans arrangement of the two chlorides. A trans effect of the bond lengths was observed within the structure. Similarly, treating [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] with 1:1:1 molar ratios of 2-picolylamine (Picam) and 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphine)ferrocene (DPPF) ligands yielded the Ru(II) complex trans-Ru(DPPF)(Picam)Cl₂ (2). In identical conditions, the homogeneous hydrogen transfer catalytic reactivity of complexes 1 and 2 has been tested in a basic 2-propanol solution and they indicate different catalytic activity. It was discovered that monodentate and bidentate phosphine ligands of Ru(II) complexes, as well as cis- and trans-chloro configuration display different catalytic properties from our experimental data, in agreement with literature data. Based on DFT calculations, the relative molecular catalytic reactivity of all available experimental data is understood from the relative calculated molecular energy.

Green chemistry, achieved by using water as a reaction medium, has several potential applications. In this work, a number of water-soluble Rh(III)–THP complexes, [Rh(III)Cl₃(OH)(THP)₂]⁻ (1), [Rh(III)Cl₂(OH)(THP)₃] (2), [Rh(III)Cl(OH)(THP)₄]⁺ (3), [Rh(III)Cl(OH)(en)(THP)₂]⁺ (4a), [Rh(I)(en)(THP)₂]⁺ (4b) and [Rh(III)(en)₂Cl₂]Cl (5) (where THP = P(CH₂OH)₃), were generated in aqueous media by controlling the reaction at different molar ratios of RhCl₃/THP/en (en: ethylenediamine). These complexes were fully characterized in situ by ³¹P NMR spectroscopy, base titration and by X-ray crystallography for the solid compound (4). The catalytic hydrogenation reactivities of freshly prepared complexes (1–5) were tested in situ with the selected substrate of 3,4-dimethoxystyrene under the same experimental conditions; the related catalytic reactivities are discussed in detail.