Reinhold Schmidt

Prof. Reinhold Schmidt


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 June 2011 in Acta Neuropathologica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RSReinhold Schmidt
Reinhold Schmidt
HSHelena Schmidt
Helena Schmidt
JHJohannes Haybaeck
Johannes Haybaeck
MLMarisa Loitfelder
Marisa Loitfelder
SWSerge Weis
Serge Weis
KJKurt Jellinger
Kurt Jellinger

1 February 2015 in Neurobiology of Aging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CGChristine Ghadery
Christine Ghadery
LPLukas Pirpamer
Lukas Pirpamer
EHEdith Hofer
Edith Hofer
CLChristian Langkammer
Christian Langkammer
KPKatja Petrovic
Katja Petrovic
RSReinhold Schmidt
Reinhold Schmidt

10 April 2017 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PWPhilipp Wild
Philipp Wild
JFJanine F. Felix
Janine F. Felix
ASArne Schillert
Arne Schillert
ATAlexander Teumer
Alexander Teumer
MCMing-Huei Chen
Ming-Huei Chen
MDMarcus Dörr
Marcus Dörr
BACKGROUND. Understanding the genetic architecture of cardiac structure and function may help to prevent and treat heart disease. This investigation sought to identify common genetic variations associated with inter-individual variability in cardiac structure and function. METHODS. A GWAS meta-analysis of echocardiographic traits was performed, including 46,533 individuals from 30 studies (EchoGen consortium). The analysis included 16 traits of left ventricular (LV) structure, and systolic and diastolic function. RESULTS. The discovery analysis included 21 cohorts for structural and systolic function traits (n = 32,212) and 17 cohorts for diastolic function traits (n = 21,852). Replication was performed in 5 cohorts (n = 14,321) and 6 cohorts (n = 16,308), respectively. Besides 5 previously reported loci, the combined meta-analysis identified 10 additional genome-wide significant SNPs: rs12541595 near MTSS1 and rs10774625 in ATXN2 for LV end-diastolic internal dimension; rs806322 near KCNRG, rs4765663 in CACNA1C, rs6702619 near PALMD, rs7127129 in TMEM16A, rs11207426 near FGGY, rs17608766 in GOSR2, and rs17696696 in CFDP1 for aortic root diameter; and rs12440869 in IQCH for Doppler transmitral A-wave peak velocity. Findings were in part validated in other cohorts and in GWAS of related disease traits. The genetic loci showed associations with putative signaling pathways, and with gene expression in whole blood, monocytes, and myocardial tissue. CONCLUSION. The additional genetic loci identified in this large meta-analysis of cardiac structure and function provide insights into the underlying genetic architecture of cardiac structure and warrant follow-up in future functional studies. FUNDING. For detailed information per study, see Acknowledgments.

24 October 2018 in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PNPetr Novak
Petr Novak
RSReinhold Schmidt
Reinhold Schmidt
EKEva Kontsekova
Eva Kontsekova
BKBranislav Kovacech
Branislav Kovacech
TSTomas Smolek
Tomas Smolek
MNMichal Novak
Michal Novak
Neurofibrillary pathology composed of tau protein is closely correlated with severity and phenotype of cognitive impairment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and non-Alzheimer’s tauopathies. Targeting pathological tau proteins via immunotherapy is a promising strategy for disease-modifying treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Previously, we reported a 24-week phase 1 trial on the active vaccine AADvac1 against pathological tau protein; here, we present the results of a further 72 weeks of follow-up on those patients. We did a phase 1, 72-week, open-label study of AADvac1 in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease who had completed the preceding phase 1 study. Patients who were previously treated with six doses of AADvac1 at monthly intervals received two booster doses at 24-week intervals. Patients who were previously treated with only three doses received another three doses at monthly intervals, and subsequently two boosters at 24-week intervals. The primary objective was the assessment of long-term safety of AADvac1 treatment. Secondary objectives included assessment of antibody titres, antibody isotype profile, capacity of the antibodies to bind to AD tau and AADvac1, development of titres of AADvac1-induced antibodies over time, and effect of booster doses; cognitive assessment via 11-item Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale cognitive assessment (ADAS-Cog), Category Fluency Test and Controlled Oral Word Association Test; assessment of brain atrophy via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetry; and assessment of lymphocyte populations via flow cytometry. The study was conducted between 18 March 2014 and 10 August 2016. Twenty-six patients who completed the previous study were enrolled. Five patients withdrew because of adverse events. One patient was withdrawn owing to noncompliance. The most common adverse events were injection site reactions (reported in 13 [50%] of vaccinated patients). No cases of meningoencephalitis or vasogenic oedema were observed. New micro-haemorrhages were observed only in one ApoE4 homozygote. All responders retained an immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody response against the tau peptide component of AADvac1 over 6 months without administration, with titres regressing to a median 15.8% of titres attained after the initial six-dose vaccination regimen. Booster doses restored previous IgG levels. Hippocampal atrophy rate was lower in patients with high IgG levels; a similar relationship was observed in cognitive assessment. AADvac1 displayed a benign safety profile. The evolution of IgG titres over vaccination-free periods warrants a more frequent booster dose regimen. The tendency towards slower atrophy in MRI evaluation and less of a decline in cognitive assessment in patients with high titres is encouraging. Further trials are required to expand the safety database and to establish proof of clinical efficacy of AADvac1. The studies are registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register and ClinicalTrials.gov : the preceding first-in-human study under EudraCT 2012-003916-29 and NCT01850238 (registered on 9 May 2013) and the follow-up study under EudraCT 2013-004499-36 and NCT02031198 (registered 9 Jan 2014), respectively.

1 September 2020 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAnna Damulina
Anna Damulina
LPLukas Pirpamer
Lukas Pirpamer
MSMartin Soellradl
Martin Soellradl
MSMaximilian Sackl
Maximilian Sackl
CTChristian Tinauer
Christian Tinauer
CLChristian Langkammer
Christian Langkammer
In individuals with Alzheimer disease, 3-T MRI revealed that brain iron accumulation in the temporal lobe during a mean follow-up period of 17 months was associated with cognitive deterioration ind... Background Deep gray matter structures in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) contain higher brain iron concentrations. However, few studies have included neocortical areas, which are challenging ...

25 March 2015 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSReinhold Schmidt
Reinhold Schmidt
EHE. Hofer
E. Hofer
FBF. H. Bouwman
F. H. Bouwman
KBK. Buerger
K. Buerger
CCC. Cordonnier
C. Cordonnier
SSSandro Sorbi
Sandro Sorbi
Background and purpose: Previous studies have indicated clinical benefits of a combination of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) and memantine over ChEI monotherapy in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Our objective was the development of guidelines on the question of whether combined ChEI/memantine treatment rather than ChEI alone should be used in patients with moderate to severe AD to improve global clinical impression (GCI), cognition, behaviour and activities of daily living (ADL).Methods: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials based on a literature search in ALOIS, the register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, was carried out with subsequent guideline development according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.Results: Pooled data from four trials including 1549 AD patients in the moderate to severe disease stage demonstrated significant beneficial effects of combination therapy compared to ChEI monotherapy for GCI [standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.31; −0.09], cognitive functioning (SMD −0.27, 95% CI −0.37; −0.17) and behaviour (SMD −0.19; 95% CI −0.31; −0.07). The quality of evidence was high for behaviour, moderate for cognitive function and GCI and low for ADL. Agreement of panellists was reached after the second round of the consensus finding procedure. The desirable effects of combined ChEI and memantine treatment were considered to outweigh undesirable effects. The evidence was weak for cognition, GCI and ADL so that the general recommendation for using combination therapy was weak.Conclusions: We suggest the use of a combination of ChEI plus memantine rather than ChEI alone in patients with moderate to severe AD. The strength of this recommendation is weak.