Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) produced by Clostridia species are the most potent identified natural toxins. Classically, the toxic neurological syndrome is characterized by an (afebrile) acute symmetric descending flaccid paralysis. The most know typical clinical syndrome of botulism refers to the foodborne form. All different forms are characterized by the same symptoms, caused by toxin-induced neuromuscular paralysis. The diagnosis of botulism is essentially clinical, as well as the decision to apply the specific antidotal treatment. The role of the laboratory is mandatory to confirm the clinical suspicion in relation to regulatory agencies, to identify the BoNTs involved and the source of intoxication. The laboratory diagnosis of foodborne botulism is based on the detection of BoNTs in clinical specimens/food samples and the isolation of BoNT from stools. Foodborne botulism intoxication is often underdiagnosed; the initial symptoms can be confused with more common clinical conditions (i.e., stroke, myasthenia gravis, Guillain–Barré syndrome—Miller–Fisher variant, Eaton–Lambert syndrome, tick paralysis and shellfish or tetrodotoxin poisoning). The treatment includes procedures for decontamination, antidote administration and, when required, support of respiratory function; few differences are related to the different way of exposure.

The use of artificial nail tips in professional manicure services and the application of false eyelashes are a growing trend among young women. Often, this “beauty routine” is performed at home without the supervision of an expert beautician, raising health problems due to either the spillage of these products or to accidental exposure to children. The aim of this study is to review the Pavia Poison Control Centre clinical records to identify the frequency, the most common route of exposure, and the possible risks associated to these events to support the decision-making process in emergency departments. The Pavia Poison Control Centre database was retrospectively searched for records reporting nail or false eyelash glue exposure from January 2007 to April 2020, and 42 patients were identified. Among the patients, 76% presented symptoms from mild to severe, while 24% were asymptomatic. The most common route of exposure was dermal, through cutaneous contact, as determined for 19 patients involved. Among these, seven patients presented with second-degree chemical burns, cutaneous erythema, and ocular symptoms. The most dangerous glue component was cyanoacrylate, leading to symptoms in 16 out of 22 patients, while three cases remained asymptomatic. Even if this exposure is relatively rare, nail and false eyelash glue can be seriously harmful, especially when exposure occurs via dermal or ocular routes. In the case of emergency, it is important to treat the patient as fast as possible to limit the damage caused by a burn. Moreover, even though these products are often perceived as harmless, safety precautions should be taken to prevent children from accidental contact.

Introduction: Chemical burns are a risk in domestic and occupational accidents due to the common use of caustic agents. Long-term sequelae are normally due to the amount of skin and underlying tissues damaged. We describe a case of work-related chemical burns with unusual evolution in guttate psoriasis. Case Report: A 36 years-old man was admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) three-hours after a work accident. During the cleaning of an industrial hydraulic system, a jet of hydrochloric acid 20% injured his face and upper limbs. At ED admission, he presented first and second-degree skin burns on the frontal region, on the scalp, on the right forearm, and earlobe. Plastic surgery management consisted in wound topical dressing with silver sulfadiazine and paraffin gauze twice a week for one month. Forty-eight hours after the latter topical treatment (45-days after the work accident), in the same anatomical regions of the previous burn scars, he developed a skin reaction with itchy erythema. The application of topical products was suspended without improvement, excluding an allergic reaction. Within few days, a generalized guttate psoriasis was evident on the whole body. Discussion: Despite many prevention actions, work-related burns are a relatively common cause of hospitalization and may involve up to 80% of patients admitted to a burn unit. Guttate psoriasis has not been described as a sequelae of chemical burns. In our case, the others most frequent factors causing guttate psoriasis have been ruled out. Considering the temporal link between the development of guttate psoriasis and the work accident, hydrochloric acid skin burns might have promoted the systemic inflammatory mediators’ mechanism involved in the development of guttate psoriasis lesion’s after the dermal injury.