Uterine fibroids or uterine myomas are one of the most common benign diseases of the uterus. Symptoms associated with myomas can make surgical removal of myomas necessary. Besides the traditional abdominal route, laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) has gained more acceptances over the last few decades, and it is anticipated that laparoscopy is associated with lower adhesion development. Therefore, we conducted this review to analyze the evidence on adhesions after LM. The PubMed database was searched using the search terms “myomectomy” alone and in combination with “adhesions,” “infertility OR fertility outcome,” and “laparoscopy” among articles published in English and German. Although the well-known advantages of laparoscopy, for example, less pain, less blood loss, or shorter hospital stay, myomectomy belongs to high-risk operations concerning adhesion formation, with at least every fifth patient developing postsurgical adhesions. In laparoscopic surgery, surgeons´ experience as well tissue trauma, due to desiccation and hypoxia, are the underlying mechanisms leading to adhesion formation. Incisions of the posterior uterus may be associated with a higher rate of adhesions compared to anterior or fundal incisions. Adhesions can be associated with severe complications such as small bowel obstruction, chronic pelvic pain, complications in further operations, or impaired fertility. Tissue trauma and the experience of the surgeon in laparoscopic surgery are most of the influencing factors for adhesion formation after myomectomy. Therefore, every surgeon should adopt strategies to reduce adhesion development in daily routine, especially when it conducted to preserve or restore fertility.

Postoperative adhesions represent a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. Adhesions can result from infection, ischemia, and foreign body reaction, but commonly develop after any surgical procedure. The morbidity caused by adhesions affects quality of life and, therefore, it is paramount to continue to raise awareness and scientific recognition of the burden of adhesions in healthcare and clinical research. This 2021 Global Expert Consensus Group worked together to produce consented statements to guide future clinical research trials and advise regulatory authorities. It is critical to harmonize the expectations of research, to both develop and bring to market improved anti-adhesion therapies, with the ultimate, shared goal of improved patient outcomes.

To evaluate the feasibility of using contained endobags (Morsafe®) in the retrieval of the specimen during laparoscopic surgeries in presumably benign myomatous pathology. We conducted a retrospective single center case - control study on 239 patients, between 01.05.2014 and 31.12.2017 for uterine myomata, presumed to be benign. The analyzed parameters were the method for contained specimen retrieval, the time of bag manipulation, practicability of action and the perioperative complications rate. The present work has been reported in accordance with the STROCSS criteria and guidelines [1]. the main laparoscopic interventions were myomectomy (n = 148 cases) and LASH (laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy) (n = 68 cases), LASH with bilateral salpingectomy (n = 7), LASH and bilateral adnexectomy (n = 3), LTH (laparoscopic total hysterectomy) (n = 3), LTH and bilateral adnexectomy (n = 1), radical LTH with lymphonodectomy (n = 2), LTH with bilateral salpingectomy (n = 1) and adenomyomectomy (n = 6). In 3 cases using contained closed bags, there was an evidence of malignancy in the pathological sections: leiomyosarcoma (n = 1) and endometrial carcinoma (n = 2). There were no adverse events and no intra - or postoperative bag - induced complications. Regarding the intraoperative duration, the time of bag introduction was about 7 min, and morcellation approximately 12 min. in - bag morcellation through endobag (Morsafe®) proved to be a safe laparoscopic method in retrieval of myomatous tissue, potentially reducing the risk of dissemination and thereby improving the patients' safety avoiding spreading of benign disease and malignancy, but preserving the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. The advantages concerned not only the operating time and costs, but also the safety aspects in case of malignancy. As the system can help to reduce risk of cell dissemination it could also reduce the risk in case of occult malignancy.

The peritoneal and intrauterine cavities are lined by fragile membranes with a high-wound healing capacity, e.g. repairing the endometrium in its cyclical "injury and scar-free repair process" during menstruation. However, peritoneal and intrauterine fibrosis and adhesions can develop after surgical trauma through activation of molecular, immune and genetic mechanisms. During procedures with a high-risk of adhesions, the use of new peritoneal and intrauterine conditions in combination with anti-adhesion substances are promising measures to preserve peritoneal and endometrial function and avoid the most common complication of gynecological surgery. Highlights of adhesions and anti-adhesion prevention techniques in laparoscopic, laparotomic and hysteroscopic surgeries are discussed in this paper. Unfortunately, evidence is lacking to prove the superiority of one technique over its counterparts in terms of postoperative adhesions, such as instrumentation, type of energy, distending media, and intracavitary pressure. Additionally, there is limited evidence about the efficacy and outcomes of techniques and adjuvant measures used during adhesiolysis. The definition of a universal intrauterine adhesions classification scheme as well as a prognostic scoring system to identify women at high risk of postoperative adhesions are necessary for advising those who could benefit the most of the use of antiadhesion barriers.

The evolution of minimally invasive surgery has brought forward the appearance of new advances in the course of the most recent couple of years and has introduced energy-based devices. The newest among them today are the ultrasonically activated devices, which are utilized with a great deal of components in-play, including ergonomics and financial aspects amid surgery. The methodology embraced was finding significant investigations through studies from PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar on current ultrasonic dissectors, which are Ethicon’s Harmonic Scalpel (ACE^®), Covidien’s Sonicision™ (SNC), Conmed’s SonoSurg^® (SS) and Olympus’s Thunderbeat^®, to describe their efficacy in terms of vessel sealing speed, vessel burst pressure, visibility, operation time and thermal speed. We found postmarketing evidence to determine which device exhibits the better performance. Animal studies showed that emissivity values and maximum temperatures for coagulation are similar among devices but maximum cutting temperatures are significantly different: ACE = 191.1°C, SNC = 227.1°C, SS = 184.8°C (p < 0.001). Cooling times are significantly different among devices: 35.7 s for ACE, 38.7 s for SNC and 27.4 s for SS (p < 0.001). Cooling times of passive jaws to reach 60°C after activation were also significantly different: 25.4 s for ACE, 5.7 s for SNC, and 15.4 s for SS (p < 0.001). The perfect device would unify brilliant hemostatic outcomes with visual sharpness while permitting none or insignificant thermal damage at the place of use.