Cinzia Chiandetti

Dr. Cinzia Chiandetti

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 July 2010 in WIREs Cognitive Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Giorgio VallortigaraGiorgio Vallortigara
Giorgio Vallortigara
CCCinzia Chiandetti
Cinzia Chiandetti
Valeria Anna SovranoValeria Anna Sovrano
Valeria Anna Sovrano

1 February 2012 in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LTLuca Tommasi
Luca Tommasi
CCCinzia Chiandetti
Cinzia Chiandetti
TPTommaso Pecchia
Tommaso Pecchia
Valeria Anna SovranoValeria Anna Sovrano
Valeria Anna Sovrano
GVGiorgio Vallortigara
Giorgio Vallortigara


1 January 2007 in Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMF. Maioli
F. Maioli
MCM. Coveri
M. Coveri
PPP. Pagni
P. Pagni
CCCinzia Chiandetti
Cinzia Chiandetti
CMC. Marchetti
C. Marchetti
VPV. Pedone
V. Pedone

4 December 2009 in Animal Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCCinzia Chiandetti
Cinzia Chiandetti
Giorgio VallortigaraGiorgio Vallortigara
Giorgio Vallortigara

26 January 2011 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCCinzia Chiandetti
Cinzia Chiandetti
Giorgio VallortigaraGiorgio Vallortigara
Giorgio Vallortigara
Questions concerning the role of nature and nurture in higher cognition appear to be intractable if one restricts one's attention to development in humans. However, in other domains, such as sensory development, much information has been gained from controlled rearing studies with animals. Here, we used a similar experimental strategy to investigate intuitive reasoning about occluded objects. Newborn domestic chicks (Gallus gallus) were reared singly with a small object that became their social partner. They were then accustomed to rejoin such an imprinting object when it was made to move and disappear behind either one of two identical opaque screens. After disappearance of the imprinting object, chicks were faced with two screens of different slants, or of different height or different width, which may or may not have been compatible with the presence of the imprinting object hidden beneath/behind them. Chicks consistently chose the screen of slant/height/width compatible with the presence of the object beneath/behind it. Preventing chicks from touching and pecking at the imprinting object before testing did not affect the results, suggesting that intuitive reasoning about physical objects is largely independent of specific experience of interaction with objects and of objects' occluding events.