Cornelis A.M. Van Gestel

Prof. Cornelis A.M. Van Gestel

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

42Years (1985-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 February 2012 in Ecotoxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TBTjeerd Blacquière
Tjeerd Blacquière
Guy SmaggheGuy Smagghe
Guy Smagghe
CGCornelis A.M. Van Gestel
Cornelis A.M. Van Gestel
VMVeerle Mommaerts
Veerle Mommaerts
Neonicotinoid insecticides are successfully applied to control pests in a variety of agricultural crops; however, they may not only affect pest insects but also non-target organisms such as pollinators. This review summarizes, for the first time, 15 years of research on the hazards of neonicotinoids to bees including honey bees, bumble bees and solitary bees. The focus of the paper is on three different key aspects determining the risks of neonicotinoid field concentrations for bee populations: (1) the environmental neonicotinoid residue levels in plants, bees and bee products in relation to pesticide application, (2) the reported side-effects with special attention for sublethal effects, and (3) the usefulness for the evaluation of neonicotinoids of an already existing risk assessment scheme for systemic compounds. Although environmental residue levels of neonicotinoids were found to be lower than acute/chronic toxicity levels, there is still a lack of reliable data as most analyses were conducted near the detection limit and for only few crops. Many laboratory studies described lethal and sublethal effects of neonicotinoids on the foraging behavior, and learning and memory abilities of bees, while no effects were observed in field studies at field-realistic dosages. The proposed risk assessment scheme for systemic compounds was shown to be applicable to assess the risk for side-effects of neonicotinoids as it considers the effect on different life stages and different levels of biological organization (organism versus colony). Future research studies should be conducted with field-realistic concentrations, relevant exposure and evaluation durations. Molecular markers may be used to improve risk assessment by a better understanding of the mode of action (interaction with receptors) of neonicotinoids in bees leading to the identification of environmentally safer compounds.


9 May 2012 in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PTPaula da Silva Tourinho
Paula da Silva Tourinho
CGCornelis A.M. Van Gestel
Cornelis A.M. Van Gestel
SLStephen Lofts
Stephen Lofts
CSClaus Svendsen
Claus Svendsen
ASAmadeu Soares
Amadeu Soares
Susana LoureiroSusana Loureiro
Susana Loureiro

17 August 2004 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMartina G. Vijver
Martina G. Vijver
CGCornelis A.M. Van Gestel
Cornelis A.M. Van Gestel
RLRoman P. Lanno
Roman P. Lanno
Nico M. Van StraalenNico M. Van Straalen
Nico M. Van Straalen
WPWillie Peijnenburg
Willie Peijnenburg

1 January 2020 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSalla Selonen
Salla Selonen
ADAndraž Dolar
Andraž Dolar
AKAnita Jemec Kokalj
Anita Jemec Kokalj
TSTina Skalar
Tina Skalar
LDLidia Parramon Dolcet
Lidia Parramon Dolcet
CGCornelis A.M. Van Gestel
Cornelis A.M. Van Gestel
Polyester fiber is one of the most abundant types of microplastics in the environment. A major proportion of the fibers entering wastewater treatment plants end up in sewage sludge, which is used as a soil fertilizer in many countries. As their impacts in the terrestrial environment are still poorly understood, we studied the effects of polyester fibers on enchytraeids (Enchytraeus crypticus), springtails (Folsomia candida), isopods (Porcellio scaber) and oribatid mites (Oppia nitens), all playing an important role in soil decomposer food webs. We exposed these invertebrates in the laboratory to short (12 µm-2.87 mm) and long (4-24 mm) polyester fibers, spiked in soil or in food at five concentrations ranging from 0.02% to 1.5% (w/w) and using five replicates. Overall the effects of polyester fibers on the soil invertebrates were slight. Energy reserves of the isopods were slightly affected by both fiber types, and enchytraeid reproduction decreased up to 30% with increasing fiber concentration, but only for long fibers in soil. The low ingestion of long fibers by the enchytraeids suggests that this negative impact arose from a physical harm outside the organism, or from indirect effects resulting from changes in environmental conditions. The short fibers were clearly ingested by enchytraeids and isopods, with the rate of ingestion positively related to fiber concentration in the soil. This study shows that polyester fibers are not very harmful to soil invertebrates upon short-term exposure. However, longer lasting, multigeneration studies with functional endpoints are needed to reveal the possible long-term effects on soil invertebrates and their role in the decomposition process. This study also shows that polyester fibers can enter terrestrial food web via ingestion of fibers by soil invertebrates.

1 January 2003 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMartina G Vijver
Martina G Vijver
JVJos P.M. Vink
Jos P.M. Vink
CMCornelis J.H Miermans
Cornelis J.H Miermans
CGCornelis A.M. Van Gestel
Cornelis A.M. Van Gestel