Maximilian Gebhardt

Mr. Maximilian Gebhardt


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 November 2021 in International Journal of Production Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMaximilian Gebhardt
Maximilian Gebhardt
MKMatthias Kopyto
Matthias Kopyto
Hendrik BirkelHendrik Birkel
Hendrik Birkel
EHEvi Hartmann
Evi Hartmann
Close and novel forms of collaboration among supply chain stakeholders within and beyond industry boundaries are essential for implementing a circular economy. Industry 4.0 technologies, as recognised enablers for circular systems, can support such collaboration. This study explores the intersection of the circular economy, supply chain collaboration, and Industry 4.0. First, we derive an analytical framework that contextualises circular supply chain collaboration. Second, based on this framework, we conduct a systematic literature review that explores how Industry 4.0 technologies can enable collaboration mechanisms. The review shows that information sharing and joint planning and decision-making are the most common collaboration mechanisms studied. Simultaneously, the Internet of Things, Blockchain, and Cloud Systems are the most discussed technologies to enable those mechanisms. The most prominent review sample patterns are synthesised into three archetypes for Industry 4.0-enabled circular supply chain collaboration. Furthermore, the study derives nine promising questions for future research along six main dimensions: Digital Twins and Artificial Intelligence, joint knowledge creation and innovation, collaboration in product design and planning, systemic collaboration across industry boundaries, contextualisation with barriers for implementing circular supply chains, and transferability of applications across industries.

31 January 2022 in Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAlexander Spieske
Alexander Spieske
MGMaximilian Gebhardt
Maximilian Gebhardt
MKMatthias Kopyto
Matthias Kopyto
Hendrik BirkelHendrik Birkel
Hendrik Birkel

9 June 2022 in International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAlexander Spieske
Alexander Spieske
MGMaximilian Gebhardt
Maximilian Gebhardt
MKMatthias Kopyto
Matthias Kopyto
Hendrik BirkelHendrik Birkel
Hendrik Birkel
EHEvi Hartmann
Evi Hartmann
Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic unveiled resilience deficits in supply chains. Scholars and practitioners aim to identify supply chain resilience (SCRES) measures suitable for this unique disruption; however, empirical evidence on a pandemic's specific characteristics, resulting challenges, and suitable countermeasures is scarce.Design/methodology/approach: A single-case study on an automotive supply chain network (ASCN), including eight nodes, was conducted. Based on current research and interviews with 35 experts, characteristic pandemic challenges for the ASCN were identified. Moreover, promising SCRES measures were determined along the most prominent SCRES levers. The findings lead to five central propositions and advance organizational information processing theory in the context of SCRES.Findings: This study’s results confirm unique pandemic characteristics along the supply chain disruption's duration, severity, propagation, and volatility. The resulting unprecedented challenges made the ASCN apply novel SCRES measures, particularly regarding collaboration and risk management culture. However, well-known visibility and flexibility strategies were also suitable. Overall, agility and collaboration measures showed the highest capacity to address characteristic pandemic challenges. A lack of preparedness impeded some measures' application, calling for enhanced proactive risk management following the pandemic.Originality/value: This paper addresses several research calls by providing in-depth empirical evidence on hitherto conceptually researched pandemic characteristics, challenges, and suitable SCRES measures from a network perspective. The study uncovers the different perceptions of individual tiers, emphasizing the need to analyze supply chain disruptions from multiple angles.